Category Archives: Arsenal

David Ornstein expects 6 players to leave Arsenal this summer

Morning! First proper blog since returning from Egypt.

Cairo is a brilliant, mental, crazy place that I would advise anyone spending 3-4 days in to properly acclimatise to the city. Sharm el Sheikh on the other hand was bland, boring and disinteresting. It had no culture and nothing of interest to really do. No real “local town” to immerse yourself in. The Caribbean trumps Sharm a million to one.

David Ornstein did a Q&A yesterday in The Athletic where he answered fan questions. These sessions are more like a podcast, used to drive subscribers to the media outlet, and are more what Ornstein’s opinion is rather than him sharing information he has – although his opinion comes from a a knowledge base often a lot higher than your standard podcaster.

During the Q&A, Ornstein spoke about departures saying “so much of this [summer business] will be contingent on exits”. He then went on to name the 6 men that Arsenal could look to cash in on. None of them were groundbreaking names:

Aaron Ramsdale

I get some fans still have a love for Ramsdale. My view has always been people like him more due to his character rather than his ability. Rambo is a decent keeper, but I just feel David Raya is that level ahead.

After a shakey start, Raya has settled down now and is a secure choice between the posts. He is superior to Ramsdale in almost every area.

Selling Ramsdale for in excess of £40million and buying Raya for £27m makes complete sense.

With his departure, we would need to sign a second choice keeper – but we need to do that if Ramsdale stays and Raya is not made permanent. Keeping both is an unlikely option.

That new keeper will probably cost the surplus between Raya and Ramsdale, which will still mean balanced books rather than having the negative outlay of a new 2nd choice keeper.

I would expect the likes of Newcastle and Brentford to both be in for Ramsdale. Maybe Chelsea and Brighton as well.

Kieran Tierney

Absolutely love Tierney and I think he can be credited for a lot of the culture change at Arsenal, and was clearly a positive impact on young players come through alongside Rob Holding. The pair provided positive professional role models to youngsters as an alternative to his brash, egocentric team mates. However I think his time at Arsenal has come to an end.

I have never doubted Tierney’s talent. He is a fantastic, old school left back. But that is not what Arsenal need under Mikel Arteta.

Last season, when called upon to play the inverted role, Tierney struggled. He had neither the technical ability, awareness or physical attributes to play the role. You could question as to why Arteta would ask him to play a role he was not suitable for, and whether the Spaniard should have tweaked the tactics slightly to accommodate him replacing Olexandr Zinchenko.

Over the summer, the recruitment team addresses the issue by signing Jurrien Timber. We also have Takehiro Tomiyasu and Jakub Kiwior who can play on that left hand side. That left Tierney as 4th choice and was a big reason for his loan move.

Out on loan to Real Sociedad, he has picked up 2 injuries to add to his ever-elongating list. That makes it 9 spells on the sidelines since joining us in 2019.

Tierney joined on a 5-year deal in 2019 for £25m. In 2021 he signed a new 5-year extension. That means he has around £6million in book value left, so any sale above this would represent a profit.

Despite his injuries, someone will take a risk on Tierney. He turns 27 this summer and you can see someone like West Ham, Aston Villa or Newcastle taking a punt. I would be surprised if he leaves for less than £20m.

Nuno Tavares

The Portuguese left back was a punt that did not work out. You can see why scouts across Europe were excited about him; Nuno Tavares is physically and technically brilliant. But he has a lot of rough edges which he has not been able to iron out.

At times for Marseille last season on loan, Tavares looked a world beater. Then he would turn to Sunday League level. All within the same game!

Nottingham Forest have an option to buy for around £12million, but considering he has hardly played for them and their impending financial sanctions, I would be surprised if a deal happens.

A move abroad (potentially back to France), could be best for him as I just can not see a Premier League club moving for him. Arsenal will do well to recoup the £8m we paid for him (although we have already made some of this back in loan deals).

If you account for what we have received in loan fees, we only really need to sell Tavares for around £2m to see a “book profit”.

Albert Sambi Lokonga

Lokonga is finally fulfilling some of his potential in recent weeks whilst on loan at Luton. This has lead some Arsenal fans to call for him to have a second chance at the club. This can not happen.

To put it simply, being good enough for Luton does not mean you are good enough for Arsenal; and we now need to be looking at recruiting players better than the Belgium (Martin Zubimendi) to continue moving forward as a club.

With just 2-years left on his contract, Lokonga remaining at Arsenal would also mean a new 5-year deal. That would be a huge risk after 2 years of underwhelming football and a good half dozen games for Luton.

The good news is that his form has put him in the news, and you can certainly see someone like Everton signing him to replace Andre Onana, or Luton making him their key signing if they stay up.

He has a book value remaining of around £4m. I would expect him to be sold for around £20m which would represent a £16m profit in this years accounts.

Emile Smith Rowe

Long term readers will know that Emile Smith Rowe has been on my “out” list for a few years.

It is not that I do not rate him, it is just that he can not stay fit. And the hype he had around him 2 years ago meant we could have got in excess of £40m.

Smith Rowe has always had his injury problems. He has issues as a kid and these have continued into adulthood. He reminds me a bit of Darren Anderton – you know there is a player there but he just can not stay fit.

The Englishman turns 24 in July and it will be two injury interrupted seasons since his breakthrough in 2021/22. I think we need to move forward from him. Make the sale, bank the 100% profit and get in someone who is physically more reliable.

Despite his injury record, plenty of Premier League teams will be in for him, and you can certainly see him going for above £30m – Crystal Palace (Smith Rowe is Croydon born), looks a good option if either Michael Olise or Eberechi Eze depart.

That £30m+ will be 100% book profit as he has come through the academy.

Eddie Nketiah

I have defended Nketiah over the years, pushing him as a good option for a 2nd choice striker. However, he has not kicked on this season and, with Gabriel Jesus’ injuries, I think we need a new front line forward.

An incoming first choice striker would see Jesus forced into a new role at Arsenal where he becomes the back up forward across the front 3. That would leave Nketiah as 3rd choice at best, an clearly surpluses to requirements.

Like Smith Rowe, as Eddie is from the academy any sale would be a 100% book profit.

West Ham, Crystal Palace, Everton, Brentford and Bournemouth could all be in the market for a new striker this summer. I can see a fee of a minimum of £20m. This could quickly rise above £30m if there is enough interest.

Book value

For those that do not understand, a players book value is how much of his initial transfer fee has not yet been fully amortised. For academy players, they have a book value of £0m.

A players transfer fee is amortised over the length of their contract. If they sign a new deal, the outstanding fee yet amortised is then spread out over the length of their new contract.

For example, Kieran Tierney joined in 2019 for £25m on a 5-year deal. His fee would have been amortised at £5m a year. In 2021 he signed a new 5-year deal. At this point £10m of his fee would have been amortised, with £15m remaining. This would then be amortised at £3m a year over the next 5-years. As of the end of this season, we would have accounted for £19m of his initial £25m fee (£10m + £9m). That leaves £6m to be amortised.

When you sell a player, the remaining book value must be fully accounted for in the same year as they were sold. The incoming transfer fee then establishes whether you make a book profit or loss on the player.

So for example, we signed Nicolas Pepe for £72m, and his contract was being amortised at £14.4m a year. Had we sold him after 2 years for £30m, we would have ended up having a £43.2m cost hit our accounts, with only £30m of incoming transfer fees. That means we would have made a £13.2m loss in the year we would have sold him. The result of that is we would have less money to spend, despite making the sale!.

Final thoughts

Ramsdale’s departure will provide the cash for David Raya and also pay off Rambo’s remaining book value. With Raya’s fee then being amortised, we should be able to get in a second choice keeper without seeing a yearly expenses on fees increase. The 3 deals will almost be “net zero”.

If we then sell the other 5 mentioned in the blog for the prices rumoured, it will account for around £100m book profit. That clears us nicely of any PSR concerns and is cash we can immediately re-invest into new signings.

For 2023 we made a £38m loss. That will turn into around a £60m profit for 2024 due to Champions League football. Whilst some of the expected profit will be used for transfer fees, we will need to start banking the cash again to cover the next rainy day.

We have lost £328m in the last 6 years and seen our cash balance drop nearly £200m to finance these losses. Last year we borrowed £63m and we have debt increases from £197m in 2018 to £276m in 2023.

No Champions League football in those 6-years has cost us over £500m in revenue, whilst player sales have also been poor during the period – just £44m made in player sales in the last 3-years.

Whilst this might all sound like bad news, the additional Champions League revenue and some good player sales should allow us to spend in excess of £120m again (after Raya), whilst still putting some cash away for that rainy day.

My bet is a new striker (£50-70m), Zubimendi / Douglas Luiz (£50m) and David Raya (£27m), will be our transfer dealings for this year. Any further new signings will only come if we sell those listed above for more than what is expected!

Nearly the weekend…

Keenos

Gabriel Jesus needs to accept new role at The Arsenal

When we signed Gabriel Jesus and Oleksandr Zinchenko, I commented whether they had developed the man strength needed to be a Premier League regular.

Man strength is what you gain over the years of being a man without hitting the gym. It is years of working onsite, or whatever, and it leads to a natural gain on your physical strength over the years.

In football terms, man strength is built by playing week in, week out from your teenage years. That slowly builds a players physical ability, their stamina, resilience and recovery.

The likes of Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo and Bukayo Saka have built that man strength from playing regular football at the highest level from their teenage years into their early 20s.

During this development period, Jesus and Zinchenko spent a lot of time on the bench for Manchester City. They became victims of Pep’s rotation system and this resulted in them reaching 25 without having ever been a first team Premier League regular.

Both now suffer injury after injury, and I think a big reason for that is due to not playing enough during their early years in England. Neither built the natural resilience needed to start 40+ games a season.

Gabriel Jesus joined us 18 months ago. A key reason for his move was to be a regular week in week out striker, rather than back up and cover down the middle and outwide.

Since joining, he has spent 5 spells in the treatment room, missing over 30 games for The Arsenal.

Jesus turns 27 in April and there has been a lot of talk about us needing to sign a new striker.

In the past, I have said a new forward signing needs to be someone who can play upfront, covering Jesus, and play on the wingers covering Martinelli and Saka. Versatile cover for all 3 forward positions.

I now think that Jesus is the man to play that role.

We go out and buy another top striker and Jesus then becomes the alternative option that he was at Man City. He is the quality back up and completion for the new centre forward , whilst also providing an alternative to Martinelli and Saka outwide.

Jesus would be able to rotate into any of those three positions, allowing us to rest someone without losing quality. He would also make a tremendous option coming in off the bench.

I believe that Martinelli is a 60 minute player. He puts so much energy into his game that after the hour mark, he is blowing on fumes. Imagine bringing on Jesus for Martinelli after an hour. Or leaving him on the bench whilst Jesus start!

Jesus will not be happy with this new role. It is the same role that he had at Manchester City. But his injury issues have changed the narrative. It can no longer be someone to back up Jesus that we need to sign, it is someone who can play ahead of Jesus.

And if in 18 months time, Jesus is unhappy about being a squad player, the door is open for him to leave.

He will be 28, so Arsenal will still get a good feee for him, and he might find playing in Spain with their less physical game more suitable to his fragile body.

These are the big decisions Mikel Arteta needs to take to make us even more competitive.

Keenos

Sky pundit using platform to influence ref decisions against Arsenal

Jamie Carragher is paid millions by Sky Sports to be an “expert” pundit. Due to his role in the media, he has amassed 2.2m followers on Twitter.

The boyhood Everton fan turned Liverpool continually uses his platform with Sky to try and influence future decisions in favour of his own team.

During the Liverpool League Cup win, Carragher continually went in about how Arsenal line up for set pieces, and post game he RT’d fans comments on the matter.

Arsenal have been unbelievable at set pieces this season. It has been a huge weapon for us and with XX Premier League goals, we lead the charts.

By spreading misinformation and fake news, Carragher is trying to derail Arsenal. He is attempting to influence the way officials ref Arsenal at set pieces.

Against West Ham, we lined up with four players in an offside position. This is a common tactics used by many clubs, including Liverpool.

The idea is that defenders become distracted by those on the offside position and end up dropping deeper to cover them off.

Whilst the defence drop deeper, the players in an offside position usually step up, and by the time the ball is kicked they are all inside. This is what happened against West Ham (and an image that Carragher has not shared).

You can quite clearly see that by the time Declan Rice has taken the free kick, every Arsenal player is onside. They have also forced the West Ham players 10 yards deeper.

No offside was given as none existed. It is fairly simple.

So why is Jamie Carragher during to make out that Arsenal are officiated differently to Liverpool and others?

In that League Cup final, Endo was in an offside position when the ball was kicked. He then proceeded to hold the Chelsea defender who was best positioned to clear the ball ahead of Virgil van Dijk. It was the right decision

Was Endo in an offside position? YES. Did he interfere with play? YES.

The key difference for Arsenal is that when Rice kicks the ball, every player is in an onside position.

No you could debate whether all blocking, etc at set pieces should be blown up as a foul for either side. But this is a minefield and every team, including Liverpool, tries to block opponents runs either doing too much to giveaway a free kick.

The key difference this time is Endo got it wrong. He did not get himself onside before proceeding to block the Chelsea runner.

As a very good pundit (which Carragher is) and a defender who played over 750 games, he knows the laws of the game, and would have defended thousands of corners in his time.

He will know about blocking opponents runs, about how to stay onside, and about lining up with players who are offside before they get themselves onside when the ball is kicked. These are not new tactics. Carragher himself would have orchestrated them when playing.

The only reason I can see for Carragher trying to make Liverpool’s disallowed goal about Arsenal, and spreading misinformation about us, is because he wants to derail our title challenge.

I have no issue with a pundit providing a fair and balanced criticism – point out when decisions got for and against your team. But I do have an issue when Carragher cleary uses his influence to try and manipulate future refereeing decisions against a team rivalling his club for the title.

Sunday was like watching Scouse TV with the way Carragher screeched on. This was a few days after Sky announced price increases up to 20%. We do not pay for this shit and it is no surprise they are losing subscribers on a monthly basis.

Carragher gets spitting mad when he is angry. How a man who assaulted a 14-year-old got is allowed on TV is beyond me. It is time for Sky to tell him to shut up or go and join Keys and Gray in Dubai.

Keenos