Category Archives: Arsenal

Martinelli red is “acceptable” if referees apply the laws consistently – no more “that’s your last chance, next one and you’re off”

The quality of referring in this country is at its lowest I have ever seen.

We have gone from refs being amateur to professional in an attempt to improve their quality. And more recently technology has been introduced to help them rectify mistakes. But they are worse than ever.

Should Gabriel Martinelli have received two yellow cards on Thursday? I really do not know.

I can understand the argument that he should have; in isolation both incidents were bookable offences. But then week in week out we see referees fail to issue that second yellow card; saying to a player “one more and you are off”.

There is a complete lack of consistency in the way English games are referred.

I go back to Granit Xhaka getting sent off years ago against Swansea City (I think?).

It was deemed a red card as Xhaka “made no attempt to play the ball”. I am still waiting for another player to be sent off for the same thing.

In fact, against Wolves, one of their players scythed down Martin Odergaard from behind with no attempt to play the ball. He only got booked.

Consistency is key. It allows players to know what they can and can not do – the lack of consistency is what led to the farcical end to the 2021 F1 season.

Gabriel had not been cautioned when he “took one for the team” and committed a foul that he knew would get him a yellow card. The referee then decided to caution him for the first offence, and send him off for the second.

Fair enough, if that had consistently happened before. But it doesn’t.

How often do we see referees go over to a player on a yellow and say “one more and you’re off” even though they have committed a second challenge that is worthy of a yellow card? It happens every weekend.

During the game, I questioned whether “Harry Kane would have got to yellows”. I honestly do not think he would.

There has always been a rule for English players (and the England captain) and a rule for non-English.

Too often refs treat English players like their friends. They go over and have a chat about an incident rather than reach for the card.

It is the lack of consistency that frustrates me.

If the rules are “you can be booked for two separate offences” then every time a player commits a cautionable offence and then throws his arms up in dissent, he should receive two yellow cards. One for the foul and one for the dissent.

But we know through history that the yellow for dissent will only be given if the behaviour continues after the caution.

Against Manchester City, Rodri scored a last gasp winner against us. He took his shirt off in celebration (yellow card offence). He then approached “the spectators in a manner which causes safety and/or security issues” which is also a yellow card offence.

He was not sent off, despite committing two yellow card offences.

Now I am not calling him to have been sent off. The referee used his discretion and came to a sensible conclusion. But if we are talking about the “letter of the law” and “consistency”, he should have been sent off.

Against Liverpool, Xhaka was sent off for denying a goal scoring opportunity.

But then for Liverpool, against Swansea City, keeper Caoimhn Kelleher bought down a Swansea attacker with a crude challenge outside the box. He was only given a yellow.

Both incidents left the attacking player with just one player to beat to score. But one got a yellow and the other a red.

Where is the consistency?

I can accept Martinelli’s red card if at the weekend it happens again when two separate bookable incidents happen in quick succession. But we know it won’t.

In fact, I bet the next time Arsenal ply, an opponent on a yellow commits another yellow card offence and is told by the ref “one more and you’re off”.

Keenos

Race for Top 4 Heating Up

So I am sitting here letting my mind wander whilst looking at the Premier League table. Usually a dangerous thing to do.

I looked at the table because I was interested in the bottom, not the top. I wanted to see what all this “Newcastle revival” talk was about. They are now out of the relegation zone.

If you were an Everton fan you would be worried. Relegation is a genuine possibility for them. It was not too long that Arsenal fans were saying we should “be more like Everton with their ambitious owners”.

Everton are also a warning to Newcastle. Just because you chuck a lot of money at a project, does not mean it will automatically become successful.

 I then looked at the top of the league.

Arsenal sit 6th. Not bad. But not great.

But we have games in hand; and that is when my mind started to wander with loads of “what ifs”.

The first one, of course, was “what if we win all 3 of our games in hand on Chelsea and West Ham?”

That would take us to 45 points.

We would be 5 clear of the Hammers and just 2 behind Chelsea. Not a bad place to be.

Then my coffee, and reality, kicked in.

We have only won 52% of our league games this year, so expecting us to win all 3 of our games in hand is perhaps unreasonable.

Our 3 games in hand are home and away to Wolves as well as a trip to Tottenham. Expecting 9 out of 9 is a tough target.

The realistic outcomes are 3 (win the home game, lose the aways), 5 (win the home, draw the aways) or 6 (win the home, snatch a victory away, lose the other).

If we get 6 points from those 3 games, it would league us on 42 points. 2 above West Ham but a way off Chelsea in 3rd.

Depending on whether we beat Spurs or not is key.

We both currently sit on 36 points, and they have a game in hand on us.

Winning at White Hart Lane takes that game in hand out of the equation.

Manchester United are also on 39 points, with 1 game in hand on all those in 3rd and 4th. A victory in that game would take them to 42 points.

There is a realistic chance that once all the games in hand have been played out, Arsenal, Tottenham and Manchester United could all be  on level points – and West Ham just a couple behind.

Fixture congestion could play a part.

Arsenal’s advantage of “not being in Europe” is negated by this weekends game against Chelsea and the Liverpool fixture being postponed due to their cup commitments.

If they continue their runs in Europe and the FA Cup, it is not clear where these games could be re-arranged too.

Arsenal could be heading into March with 3 games in hand on many of those around them – but those 3 games being trips to Chelsea and Tottenham, and a home game against Liverpool.

At that point we will almost have to ignore that we have games in hand.

It is hotting up in the race for top 4.

Keenos

Pablo Mari “unlucky” at Arsenal

It is all a little quiet in Arsenal World at the moment.

The winter break followed by the FA Cup 4th round means it has been an age since Arsenal last played a game.

For once I am grateful for mid-week football. If it was not for Thursday’s trip to Wolves, we would still have to wait another 11 days for our next Premier League fixture.

Arsenal were due to face Chelsea this weekend. But due to their participation in some international friendly tournament, we have no weekend game.

On that, does anyone really care about the World Club Cup (or whatever it is called)? For me, it goes into the same boat as the Community Sheild and European Super Cup. Just a glorified friendly.

Held it football hot beds such as the United Arab Emirates and Qatar, it is clearly an attempt by FIFA to cash in on the lucrative domestic game. But does anyone actually care about Chelsea playing some Saudi Arabian team no one has ever heard of?

Fact that the European teams join at the semi-final stage, potentially face teams from Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Mexico, Tahiti and Abu Dhabi sums the competition up.

Tottenham had to beat better teams to win the Audi Cup!

It seems the only people that care about such trophies are the wierd little kids that like to boast how many trophies a player has won – and then add all the friendly tournament. Or in Chelsea’s case the “we could win 7 trophies this year” but 3 of them are friendly tournaments.

Anyway, I have digressed a little bit and risk coming across bitter as Arsenal do not have the opportunity to play in a competition that I do not give two fucks about.

The only Arsenal related news floating about is the comments from Pablo Mari yesterday.

Mari made a solid debut for Udinese at the weekend, showing the leadership skills we knew he had. After the game he spoke about leaving Arsenal and his relationship with Mikel Arteta.

“I haven’t had any luck at Arsenal but when I’ve been on the pitch, I think I’ve given a very good level. In the end, there comes a point where you have to make decisions”

“Arteta is one of the best managers I’ve come across. He helped me a lot to understand football better. It’s an idea very similar to Guardiola’s, but with it’s subtle differences.”

It is interesting to note his comments about Arteta. He is full of praise for his managerial ability. A stark contrast to what Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang said.

I do agree with Mari as well that he was a bit unlucky at Arsenal.

He joined on loan in January 2020 and looked a solid option, adding leadership to a shakey backline. That deal was made permanent in the summer.

That same summer the Gabriel deal materialised and Arsenal secured one of the best left sided centre backs in football.

When the deal for Mari was done, the club did not know the Gabriel deal would come up a few months later. We needed a left footed centre back for balance and Mari joined.

Gabriel’s Arsenal career was pretty much over the day Gabriel joined. The Brazilian has been one of the best defenders in the league.

With no European football this year, Mari’s appearances have been few and far between.

In the summer, William Saliba is likely to return to compete for a starting XI place. That would have pushed Mari further down the pecking order.

Mari is on loan at Udinese, but if he puts in some good performances a buyer will come in for him.

Anyone, that is all for today. Have a good Tuesday.

Keenos