Are Arsenal playing silly buggers over Declan Rice?

Over a week has now passed since Arsenal “reached total agreement with West Ham to sign Declan Rice”, and it has still not yet been announced that he has signed.

Yesterday it was leaked that West Ham did not have a clue what was going on. That the medical was completed and contracts agree, but the paperwork was sitting with Arsenal’s lawyers.

It is interesting that after so much noise in the media, once a deal became close silence filled the space.

As we discussed previously, it was important to ignore the noise, or at the least understand where it was coming from.

All the leaks prior to the deal were coming from the West Ham side. And likewise, the story that “the paperwork is with Arsenal’s lawyers” has also come from their side.

There is plenty of speculation as to the reasoning Rice has not yet been announced. Here we will try and unpack those theories

Arsenal playing silly buggers

Play silly buggers in British Englishslang. to fool around and waste time.

During the negotiations, there was plenty of discussion about West Ham trying to manipulate the market in an attempt to up the price.

Stories kept flowing from their side that Manchester City, Manchester United, Chelsea and Bayern Munich were “on the verge of bidding”. In the end, only City bid, and that was swiftly rejected.

There was also talk that West Ham had increased a previously gentleman’s agreement on the fee following their minor European success.

The story goes Arsenal’s first bid was in and around the original asking price. West Ham then hiked their demands up and tried to embarrass Arsenal by releasing details of their offer, much below their new asking price.

With West Ham in agreement on the fee, and Rice committed to Arsenal, it is highly unlikely that the deal will collapse. Rice can not go back to West Ham and no one else will come in for him. This means the ball is now in Arsenal’s court.

Rumours are we are dragging our feet with the paperwork, knowing all of the above. That this is being done to punish West Ham who are unable to make any incoming transfers themselves until we have made that first payment.

It is a statement: “you played silly buggers during negotiations, we are getting our revenge now”.

Arsenal don’t have the money

A theory from West Ham twitter this time.

They are trying to say Arsenal are broke, can not afford the fee, and the delays are due to us trying to secure funding.

If this is true, and let’s be honest it isn’t, it would show huge incompetence on Arsenal that they have negotiated for both Declan Rice and Jurrien Timber without having the cash.

But we do have the cash.

The club have just received around £100m for season ticket holders. The first instalment of this seasons TV money has been paid. As has this years kit sponsorship,l and manufacturing. July is usually when clubs have the most money in the bank.

The reported upfront payment for Rice is £40m, the Timber deal is around £30m. We could pay that tomorrow if we wanted.

Arsenal media team are incompetent

Not really sure on this one.

Some fans have blamed out media team for the slowness of the deal being announced.

They have pointed to other clubs, such as Liverpool, who this summer have got an announcement video out 24 hours after a “fee was agreed”.

It baffles me that some people think it is our media team that are holding up the deal. They can only release the content they have created once the deal is done.

The media team are at the end of the transfer train. They will be instructed when it is OK to release the video.

It shows the world we live in where everyone is desperate to watch a video on twitter. Bring back the days of Big Sol just rocking up to a press conference with everyone expecting us to announce Richard Wright.

I’d love a return to those days. Transfers being announced by press conference.

Arsenal are trying to save money on wages

Some clubs do leave their transfer dealings to the end of the window so save money on wages.

You buy a player on 31 August rather than 1 July, you can save yourself a million pound in. But Arsenal are (no longer?) one of those clubs.

One of the significant aspects of the Edu / Mikel Arteta era is our ability to get deals done early.

We did it last season with Gabriel Jesus, Fabio Vieira and Matt Turner all signing before 4 July.

Olexsandr Zinchenko was our latest signing of last summers transfer window – signed on 22 July.

Arteta has apparently been very clear on matters. He wants his players in before the season starts so that he gets most of the pre-season with them.

The deal was always going to happen Friday

If you have followed the deal closely, and blocked out the noise, you will realise that an announcement towards the end of the week was always most likely.

There were a few windows available for the club to announce the deal.

The first was between the end of the internationals and Declan Rice going on holiday, but the deal was nowhere near complete by then.

The second window was always between Rice returning from holiday and Arsenal going away to Germany. Arsenal probably would have liked Rice (and Timber) to be out in Germany with the rest of the lads.

Rice only undertook the first part of his medical last Friday. It was completed Sunday or Monday (depending on who you believe). At that point, it was wheels up and the squad was in Germany.

As soon as the plane left, it should have been obvious to all that a deal would not be confirmed until the squad returns. That is Friday.

The 3rd window was between the German boot camp and the players going off to America. End of this week / early next.

On Monday, our view that Rice would not sign until the squad are back from Germany was also shared by a few on the West Ham side. The reliable ExWHUEmployee stated that Rice is “expected to sign those forms on Friday”.

Rice is not “still on holiday” in Portugal.

Arsenal’s international players have already returned to training. As has West Ham’s.

Due to not yet being an Arsenal player, and no longer welcome at West Ham, he has begun us first week of pre-season in the Algarve.

Rice has posted pictures of himself training alongside Portugal stars Raphael Leao, Bruno Fernandes and Joao Cancelo. I would not be surprised if there is an Arsenal coach out there, putting Rice through his paces.

Just like I suspect there is another Arsenal coach out in Holland working with Timber.

This would indicate that the plan was always to complete the Rice deal at the end of this week, once the squad are back from Germany.

And the fact that we have also not yet announced Timber indicates that he is in the same position.

Final thoughts

There really is nothing to worry about.

All signs point to this Friday. That is from those who know there stuff on both the Arsenal side and West Ham. Nothing has changed from Monday when Rice’s medical was completed.

Like before, ignore those on Twitter who make a lot of noise to just try and gain followers. Those weird accounts who just post every 5 minutes quoting sources no matter how invalid they are.

Arsenal can afford Rice, they are not playing silly buggers, it was always happening this Friday.

Expect Rice to be on a plane back to England today, and he will be joined by the rest of the Arsenal squad at London Colney tomorrow after the Nuremberg game.

Then it will be announced.

Ps: I have a feeling we might see Timber announced today at half time during the Nuremberg match.

Keenos

How does Edu solve Partey puzzle

A few days ago we spoke about the issues we face in losing potential targets if Thomas Partey does not leave swiftly.

The fear for the club will be those earmarked, such as Romeo Lavia, might agree deals with our rivals before we are in a position to secure their signature.

So if our primary options are gone, what would our options be?

Move down the list

The question for the recruitment team is just how far down the Partey replacement list are they willing to go.

Do they splash out on someone who might be 7th or 8th on our target list? Or do they keep the powder dry?

If you go too far down the list, you end up with buying a player for buying sake. You end up with someone like Lucas Perez.

You spend £20-30m on someone no one really wants, not Edu, not Mikel Arteta, and as a result they do not see any game time. Their signing then restricts you signing a preferable target in 12-months time and you are stuck with them.

The result is endless loan deals and ending up selling them for a huge loss after a couple of seasons.

Thomas Partey stays

If there is not an obvious Partey replacement still on the market, than we must block the Ghanaian from leaving.

When fit, Partey is one of the best defensive midfielders in the world. The issue is he can only perform at that high level for around 30 games a season.

Declan Rice will be Arteta’s first choice 6. His signing will allow Partey’s game time to be managed, playing in those bigger games where we want to go more defensive.

You can almost foresee a situation where Partey plays in the majoirty of our away games, whilst Havertz plays at home.

I certainly would not be upset to see Partey stay for one more year.

But then what if the offer from Saudi Arabia is north of £40m? A huge sum for a 30-year-old who can only play in half the available games a season. Arsenal would be silly to turn that down (and the chance to get Partey’s £200k a week salary off the wage bill).

It sort of makes little sense that one of our best played players would be a squad player next time, only expected to start 20-30 of the 60 games we will play.

And if we do not cash in this summer, we risk there not being a bid next.

It would cost Arsenal over £60m to keep Partey for 2-years (£40m in lost transfer fee, £20m+ in wages) and then let him go for a free.

That £60m would cover signing a replacement for £40m, and paying them £100k a year over 4 years. So if an offer comes in, we probably should take it.

The loan market

If we get to a stage where an offer for Partey is too good to turn down, but it is too late to sign a decent replacement, we may be best off looking towards the loan market.

Would Real Madrid be open to loaning out Aurelien Tchouameni if they deem him surplus for requirements over the next 12 months?

Tchouameni joined Madrid last summer for €80million on a 6 year deal.

His amortised fee costs Madrid around £12m a year. Could a deal for Tchouameni be done for around that price?

Madrid get his portion of transfer fee paid for the period, and salary. Arsenal get a very good player for a year but do not have to commit any longer. It could be an option.

And are there other options like Tchouameni that Arsenal could bring in on loan?

Of course, you also risk signing a Denis Suarez or Arthur Melo. Spending a hunk of change on someone who is either not good enough or not fit enough.

Sell Partey, sign no-one

The final option is we sign no-one.

If Partey departs, that leaves us with Rice, Jorginho and Mohamed Elneny as our 3 defensive midfield options. It would be a risk, but could we get away with it?

Once Partey departs, we might be best off keeping our powder dry if none of our top options are available.

Rice can certainly play the 6 role for 50+ games a season. And then if we want to go more defensive, Jorginho then replaces Havertz.

Elneny then provides a 3rd choice back-up in an emergancy.

Not ideal, but this option would stop us wasting money on someone we do not want.


It is not an easy puzzle to solve for Edu and the team.

Ideally, Partey’s future will be resolved sooner rather than later and we can move onto signing his replacemnt before they are snapped up elsewhere.

Keenos

“10 Unpopular Arsenal opinions” reviewed

Scrolling through Twitter, I came across an interesting thread entailing “10 Unpopular Arsenal opinions”.

With not much new news floating about, I thought it would be fun to see how valid these opions are.

Both Balogun and Nketiah should be sold to fund a better striker

This opinion is both right and wrong.

I do not think too many people would be against the sale of both if it meant a single, superior replacement was bought in. But where it falls down is who that replacements could be.

There is a lack of top strikers in world football these days. Manchester United are searching for on. Chelsea have had to sign a winger turned striker.

Anyone who is deemed an improvement on Balogun / Nketiah would probably start regularly for Manchester United, so unlikely to join Arsenal to play second fiddle to Gabriel Jesus..

And if we go the level above, there is only one realistic name that would be an improvement on Jesus – Victor Osimhen. The sale of Nketiah and Balogun would not finance him, and we would also probably end up losing Jesus as a result.

Saliba could start for any team in the world

I really do not think this is that much of an extreme opinion, and I imagine very few Arsenal fans would disagree.

William Saliba is one of the best central defenders in the world. It is probably only Manchester City with John Stones and Ruben Dias where you would think “he would not walk straight into their first team”. But then Manuel Akanji started 40 games last season…

Saliba could certainly start in place of Stones or Dias, and would have been a suitable alternative to Josko Gvardiol if he was not at The Arsenal.

Do not think this one is too unpopular.

It’s a massive mistake to sell both Partey and Xhaka in the same window

Like the Saliba one, I do not think you will find too many disagreeing.

Thomas Partey, when fit, is one of the best defensive midfielders in the world. The issue is he can only play 30 games a season.

Granit Xhaka is a leader of men. Whilst he might not have worn the armband, he was a captain on the pitch.

Declan Rice certainly replaces Xhaka’s leadership, and he can also be a long-term replacement for Partey at 6. But I think my preference is we keep Partey despite Rice’s signing.

That would allow us to go with Rice and Partey as a pair for bigger games, then Rice and Kai Havertz for games we look to dominate.

Then again, if £40m is on the table for Partey and we think we can get Romeo Lavia, then maybe we need to make the switch?

Replacing Xhaka, Partey and Albert Sambi Lokonga with Rice, Lavia and Havertz. Not sure too many would be unhappy with it.

Jakub Kiwior should start as our left back next season

File this one under “I am going to say something controversial that makes zero logic just so that I can say something different to everyone else”.

This is not an unpopular opinion. It is simply a stupid one.

Granit Xhaka had a better Arsenal career than Cesc Fabregas

I guess this one depends on how you define success.

Xhaka won 2 FA Cup’s, but was never the clubs most important player. Never the first name on the teamsheet. Was incapable of winning games for The Arsenal himself.

Cesc Fabregas was one of the best footballers I have seen. One of those players that would make inferior players around him play better, won a single FA Cup and was key as we made our first and only Champions League final.

For me, Cesc was the first name on the team sheet, our most important player and one of the best in the world. He was certainly the better player between the two.

But then if you base their Arsenal careers on trophies, then Xhaka is ahead.

Declan Rice is the best defensive midfielder in the league

Not really sure this is that unpopular. Many will agree.

Last season there were 3 defensive midfielders in the league who were head and shoulders above the rest: Rodri, Thomas Partey and Declan Rice.

All 3 could start instead of eachother and you would not see a drop off in quality.

Tomiyasu is the perfect back up option all over the defence. He is one of our ebst defenders.

Like with the Declan Rice one, I doubt you will find too many Arsenal fans disagreeing with this.

Tomiyasu’s quality has never been in question. Just his fitness.

Smith Rowe can’t be a winger next season. He’s better as an interior and can be elite

This is actually 3 opinions in one. So lets break it down:

Smith Rowe can’t be a winger next season – Emile Smith Rowe has spent almost all of his senior and youth career on the wing. Like Leandro Trossard, he gives us an option of playing outwide or inside. Why restrict a player to playing in a single position?

He’s better as an interior Literally no evidence of this. He has only played a handful of games as an 8, and was not overly impressive. Whilst many, including myself, believe he can play there, he has yet to put in a top performance playing more centrally.

Can be elite – Like with Tomiyasu, quality is not Smith Rowe’s problem. It it is fitness.

Havertz is not good enough defensively to play in midfield. He should play false 9 instead.

Like with Smith Rowe, I do not really get why fans try to put players into a silo, expecting them to only play one position.

Kai Havertz is a versatile attacker and gives Arteta 6 tactical options.

His defending and workrate is underrated. He is certainly not a defensively lazy player. His long limbs and ability to glide across the pitch just make it appear that way.

When we dominate games, expect Havertz, Rice and Odegaard to be the midfield. When we are looking to defend, it will be Rice, Partey and Odegaard. Havertz gives us further creativity in midfield for those games when defending is not a focus.

Likewise, he can play upfront, and on the wing.

Arteta is building a team where players can play more than one position. I do not really understand why fans do not get this yet.

Jesus needs to play on the wings. He’s not clinical enough for us to win the league

Last season we scored 88 league goals. the most in our history. Just 6 less than Manchester City.

Our top league scorers (jointly Gabriel Martinelli and Odegaard), scored 21 less than Erling Haaland. But we had 3 players finish in the top 10 Premier League goal scorers.

Our strength last season was goals from across the front 4 positions. We were not reliant on a single main outlet.

You could go out and sign a Dusan Vlahovic who might score 20 goals. But the sacrifice is Jesus’s movement and ability to create space for others.

We might end up with a single striker scoring double what Jesus did, but that could result in those around him scoring less. A net loss in total goals.


Some interesting “unpopular opinions”.

A few are clearly attention seeking. Those sort of posts someone makes to stand out from the crowd and try to portray themselves as a superior thinker.

Others are not actually that unpopular and many Arsenal fans would agree. Often this happens when people talk about unpopular opinions (or underrated players). Thousands will agree which means the opinion is not actually unpopular / the player is not underrated.

And finally you get those that just expose somes lack of understanding as to what Arteta is doing. These are mainly around trying to put a player in a single position.

What do you think of these opinions? And what are oyours? Join the conversation on Facebook.

Keenos