Arsenal won’t “waste money” on deadline day

It is so easy to waste money on deadline day transfer.

You get desperate and end up over paying for a target.

Or you miss out on that target and end up spending big on someone who was perhaps 9th or 10th choice. Someone you do not really want.

With Arsenal potentially set to lose £200million over 3 seasons, wasting money is something the club can not afford to do.

Take the transfer for Houssem Aouar.

It is clear Arsenal want the Frenchman. We have bid a couple of times for him, those bids have been publically rejected by Lyon president Jean-Michel Aulas.

Reports are Arsenal’s last bid was £38million plus add-ons, whilst Lyon are holding out for a deal that would be worth £60million. It is a big difference.

It is easy for fans to sit their and say “just pay the money” without looking at the bigger picture.

Lets go back a little over 12 months to last summers transfer window.

Arsenal paid the asking price for Nicolas Pepe. £72million. It is a deal that has come in for much criticism over the last 12 months.

We spent a lot of money on Pepe and it has not quite worked out. Some Arsenal now criticise the club for wasting money on signing him. That signing him is one reason why we have less money to spend this summer.

The Auoar situation is similar.

Arsenal value him at one price, Lyon at another.

If the teams are unable to meet in the middle, Arsenal or Lyon have a simple choice. Either Arsenal have to pay more, Lyon paying less, or walk away.

If the transfer does happen, it will usually end up with the buying club paying more than they wanted to for a player.

Taken into account that we have been burnt with Pepe’s transfer fee (and this is not a criticism of Pepe, he is a fantastic player), it is understandable why Arsenal are reluctant to just “pay the transfer fee”.

Someone sitting on Twitter does not know the true finances of the club. It is very easy for them to say “just spend the money”. But Arsenal might not have that extra £20million.

Likewise, spending that extra £20million could impact further transfer business, whether it is this summer, January or next.

Spending £72million was a huge investment, and you have to wonder whether Arsenal gambled. Took a little money that we would earn (and spend) in the future and add it to the Pepe transfer to get it over the line.

In basic terms, did we take £30million out of this years budget and spent if on Pepe last year?

It could then be a similar position to Aouar.

£38million is affordable. £60million could impact other transfers.

It is important that Arsenal do not overpay for players.

Another balancing act for clubs is who to target when deals fall through.

Football clubs will have a list of targets per position. If Arsenal wanted a target man striker, there would be a list of maybe a dozen players, in order of preference. Miss out on the top one, go onto the second one.

The risk on deadline day is how low on your list you are willing to go.

If Arsenal decide not to pursue Aouar today, and their second choice is unattainable, as is there 3rd and 4th, they then have a decision to make.

Do they keep going down the list, and end up buying a player for the sake of buying, which could end up with them buying a player they do not really want. Or do they decide that no signing is better than signing someone they do not want.

Take Lucas Perez.

In 2016 Jamie Vardy was clearly the clubs first choice transfer target. Vardy decided at the last minute that he would rather stay at Leicester. On August 27th, 4 days before the transfer window shut, Arsenal made the surprising signing of Lucas Perez.

No one had ever really heard of Perez, and his signing was certainly out of the club. All fans knew was what they could see on Wikipedia. That he had scored 17 La Liga goals in the season previous, but was very much a journeyman striker.

Did Arsenal really want him? Or was he a signing for signings sake.

Perez cost Arsenal £17.1million and was sold 2 years alter to West Ham for just £4million having scored 1 league goal.

Arsenal would have been better off not signing Perez. After all, Olivier Giroud, Danny Welbeck, Alexis Sanchez and Theo Walcott could all play upfront.

Instead of paying big money for Lucas Perez, we should have perhaps just promoted Chuba Akpom for the season, saving the club a lot of money.

So Arsenal face a similar situation today.

Do Arsenal go back to Lyon and offer the money they are demanding? Potentially pay over the odds for him, impacting future transfer dealings?

Do Arsenal go for the second choice on the list – seemingly Jorginho?

If the second or third choice is not available, do Arsenal keep going down the list and buy someone just for the sake of it?

Or do Arsenal decide to hold their nerve, not waste money overpaying or signing a player they do not want, and use a player currently at the club to fill the position?

Look at someone like Bukayo Saka. If Arsenal want to go 433, can he be the man to play on the left hand side?

He has shown on the wing that he has the defensive work rate. He is a good passer and can run with the ball. When you compare his statistics to Aouar from last season – passing and tackling, he is not too far behind Aouar.

Maybe Saka is the option?

One thing is for sure, Arsenal will not waste money today.


6 thoughts on “Arsenal won’t “waste money” on deadline day

  1. The font

    Normally we would not have a chance to sign Aouar PSG REAL MADRID JUVENTUS can all offer him more salary more trophies. this is a missed opportunity In my thinking.
    Players of his quality are rarely available. There is more than a 50% chance This guys value will increase. So the calculated overpayment for his services is worth the risk.


  2. obuh chukwuka

    Yeah, I think you are just on point. Enough of all these buyings and recruitments especially when the prices of players from average teams are being skyrocketed by the owners of clubs. I am totally not against new additions but not to the financial detriment of our beloved football club.


  3. chris

    If the senior management had not wasted so much money before the club would be better able to buy now. It is no surprise that Kroenke & Co put in a legal trusty to excavate.


  4. Ken

    Kreonke is mean and never understands how business is done.small clubs will overtake arsenal and it will become a selling club.Buy zaha,Ings,or Partey and see if they can’t be a hit.nobody will ever believe in him


  5. Seroti

    What has Aouar won for OL?? For him to cost such amount, fans always believe that the price justify the ability and having a go on the club for not buying.
    Thomas Lemar was a prime example when Monaco was demanding close to 80mp for him and Arsenal backed out fans ridicule the club look at him now can’t even get a minute in Spain for almost all the time he has been there.
    Pepe another fine player with high price now people can’t give him the time to acclamatise properly into the premiership league pattern of play which in return affects its output. In as much I want new signings for Arsenal will surely be enraged if we buy just for buying sake taken to account the 55ple and now our friendly Goonerus who just lost there jobs due to the COVID 19 outbreak after effects.
    Arsenal should live within there means no overpaying for overpriced players.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.