Category Archives: Arsenal

Sterling, Gnabry and Sane – Who would best suit Arsenal?

Sadio Mane’s impending move to Bayern Munich could trigger a transfer merry-go-round which Arsenal could be involved in.

Bayern Munich are likely to need to sell to make room for the Liverpool winger – with both Serge Gnabry and Leroy Sane linked with moves away.

On top of this, speculation is increasing that Raheem Sterling could be moving from Manchester City.

That would put 3 wingers of similar age and profile on the market. And Arsenal could do with an extra wide forward. So who should we go for?

Raheem Sterling

Let’s start with the English lad, Sterling.

He has been linked with a move away from Manchester City for the last few summers.

Now 27-years-old, he has never started less Premier League games since his breakthrough season back in 2012 for Liverpool.

He still has a good 5 years left in his career. The question is does he want to spend that time as an increasingly bit-part player, or does he want to force a move to somewhere that he begins to play week in, week out once more?

On paper he looks just what Arsenal need.

Our left hand side is our weaker side and he would certainly improve it – adding goals, assists and a direct style of play.

There is a worry that he has already peaked.

2017/18: 18 league goals, 11 assists
2018/19: 17 & 10
2019/20: 20 & 1
2020/21: 10 & 7
2021/22: 13 & 5

Whilst he has still put-up decent numbers for a winger in the last two years, they are diminishing numbers. His game time has reduced by 20% since the 2019 season/

Whilst he is still just 27, he has just completed his 10th full season of Premier League football.

542 games for club and country, there are plenty of miles on the clock.

The question is what has Pep seen to reduce that game time? Those statistics that you only see in training – his top end pace, acceleration, sharpness.

If these are on the decline, then he is a player to avoid. The problem is we will not know if they are declining.

A player that relied so much on explosiveness and pace. Once it begins to go, he could be done (see Theo Walcott).

Someone will take a risk on Sterling this summer. I am just not sure whether it should be us.

Serge Gnabry

The one that got away.

I have written the real story of Gnabry previously on the blog. It is well worth a red.

Just 6 months younger than Sterling, he has 50% less games in his career (277 v 542) – that highlights just how many miles Sterling has on his clock.

Gnabry’s talent was never in question when he was at Arsenal. He was earmarked for huge things.

Injury and a poor loan deal saw him seek a move back to Germany where Bayern Munich eventually got him in a cut price deal from Werder Bremen. It was a move that left a bitter taste in many peoples mouths.

When Gnabry left for first team football, it was clear he was not ready to be playing at Arsenal’s level – the fact it took 2 seasons and spells at Bremen and 1899 Hoffenheim before he made his Munich debut indicates this.

But he has flourished into the player we all hoped he would become.

There are a couple of worries about him though.

The move of Jadon Sancho to Manchester United has shown that the gap between the Premier League and Bundesliga is huge.

Whilst Bayern Munich are a force to be reckoned with on the world stage, there is not much else in behind.

That means Gnabry gets plenty of opportunities to play against what are frankly Championship level teams and stat pad.

Whilst his Bundesliga record is strong for Bayern – 46 goals in 122 games – his Champions League record is poor.

You take out the 2019/20 season where he scored 9 in 10 games, he has just 3 goals in 21.

In that 2019/20 season, he scored 4 of his goals in a single game against Spurs.

20 goals in 31 games for his country also looks a strong record, but he has never scored at an international tournament.

His international goals have come against Northern Ireland (4), San Marino (3), Estonia (2), Romania (2), Russia, Switzerland, Latvia Armenia and Iceland.

He has a single goal against the Netherlands in UEFA 2020 qualifying and scored against Argentina in a friendly.

His record very much feels like one of a “stat padder” and this makes you wonder if he is really what we need to take us to the next level?

I would also be concerned that he has played the majority of his career on the right hand side.

We have Bukayo Saka on the right and need to be investing in cover for him. Gnabry is not cover but competition.

It is the left hand side where we need to increase our quality.

A few people have put Gnabry left, Saka right, but the left is not a position Gnabry has played much in his career.

If we are investing £30million+, we should not be buying a square peg to put in a round hole.

Signing Gnabry would also lead Arsenal to get the “Pogba criticism” of selling him for very cheap and signing him back years later for a lot more.

The comparison between Gnabry and Pogba is perhaps unfair as Manchester United let the Frenchman go for nothing and resigned him for £70million. The figures are very different to what we sold Gnabry for and are expecting to sign him.

I am not sold on Gnabry. I wonder if there is a little nostalgia from fans. And question whether he is good enough to take that step up.

Leroy Sane

Finally we come onto Gnabry’s team mate at Bayern Munich – Leroy Sane.

Sane is one of those players that many of us have watched since he had his breakthrough season for Schalke in 2015.

The summer of 2016 I wanted Arsenal to be in for him, but he moved to Manchester City for £37million.

He always seemed to be on the fringes of the Manchester City team, never quite fully breaking through (although I do feel this is how Pep likes it).

He was competing with the likes of Sterling, Gabriel Jesus, David Silva, Bernardo Silva, Jesus Navas and Riyad Mahrez for a starting place.

After 3 years of trying to establish himself as a first team regular, he left for Bayern Munich.

As mentioned above, Pep seems to like to rotate his front-line regularly. Very few of his forwards end up with over 30 Premier League starts in a single season.

This season is a perfect example of that: Bernardo Silva (33 PL starts), Kevin de Bruyne (25), Foden (24), Sterling (23), Grealish (22) & Jesus (21). Does Pep have a theory that to keep everyone fresh and firing, there is a certain amount of minutes a player should play? Or is it just because he has an embarrassment of riches that he needs to rotate a lot.

I think Sane’s failure to fully break through at City should therefore be taken with a pinch of salt.

There is a concern however over his performances for Bayern Munich.

After 2 years he is already looking to leave (or are they shopping him out?).

In that time he has started 18 and 22 games respectively scoring 13 goals.

It is not a record that particularly excites me.

He left Manchester City due to lack of game time, and he rumoured to be leaving Bayern Munich for the same reason. You then have to question his hunger.

Is he striving every day in training to improve, to force his way into first team action. Or is he coasting on his natural talent and expects to start week in week out just on that.

If it is the former, then he is a hungry player with a lot to prove. If it is the latter then he is more suited to a West Ham where he would start every game without really trying.

Sane has spent much of his career on the left hand side which, as already established, is Arsenal’s weaker side.

He would come straight into our first team, which would then leave Gabriel Martinelli and Emile Smith Rowe as the cover on both flanks.

I guess the question is when Mikel Arteta and Edu look into his eyes, do they see a player with hunger. With burning desire to get his career back on track. Or do they see a player that just wants to coast through his career.


I started this blog thinking about who I would prefer between Sane, Sterling and Gnabry.

As I wrote it, I felt more negatives and question marks than positives over which one we should sign.

With their ages and what they can give to us, I wonder if we should invest the £30-£35million into someone younger, hungrier. Someone like Cody Gakpo.

But if push comes to shove, I would probably pick Sterling over Sane and Gnabry.

Who would you want?

Keenos

Nketiah, Marquinhos, Saliba and More

Nketiah

So yesterday I tried to justify the new deal for Eddie Nketiah, and the response was surprisingly positive.

I also ran a little comparison of Eddie to Aubameyang on Twitter.

I actually think Nketiah will outscore Aubameyang next season. The honeymoon is over for the Barcelona man and it will not be long until he downs tools once again.

Do I think Eddie is a superstar? No. But in a world where Aston Villa are reportedly demanding £50 million and Everton asking for £60million for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, I would rather keep Eddie.

As discussed yesterday, there are very few top strikers out there. And even less that will want to play second fiddle.

When you look that Manchester City have gone through the season with one out and out forward, Tottenham have only had Harry Kane up top as an option for a few years and Manchester United often played without a recognised striker this season, you will see what the problem facing Arsenal is.

The choice is we either keep Nketiah, or sign someone like Watkins or Ivan Toney for big money who are distinctly average.

Marquinhos

Reports are that Wolves have launched legal action against Marquinhos over his impending move to Arsenal.

They claim that the Brazilian winger had a pre-contract agreement with them, which he has set to break.

The situation could get very messy.

Who remembers when Manchester United thought they had signed John Obi-Mikel?

Manchester United had agreed to signed the Nigerian back in 2005. Contracts in place and everything. Then at the eleventh hour a deal with Chelsea went through.

Mikel was then unable to play for 12 months whilst a case went to court. Eventually Chelsea had to pay Manchester United £12million.

I know nothing about Marquinhos and whether he is worthwhile spending time and energy fighting over.

William Saliba

I am delighted to have the Frenchman back.

He is clearly a talent and was a rough diamond that needed shining.

Saliba would have grown as a man over the last 2 seasons and still just 21, he will now be ready for Premier League football.

With European football back at the Emirates, we need another quality centre back to provide cover and competition for Ben White and Gabriel.

There will be plenty of game time for all 3.

Internationals

What is the point of these post season internationals?

Players should now be on holiday, releaxing in the sun. Instead we have the Nations League.

England (and others) will play 4 games over the next two weeks.

When the World Cup comes around in November and key players are injured, FIFA & UEFA will have to take a long hard look at themselves of their scheduling.

The Nations League is no more than glorified friendlies.

Scrap it, let the players rest and have a full pre-season with the clubs that pay their wages.

Keenos

Finding logic in Nketiah’s new deal

I usually try and find logic behind every signing, every contract renewal. I attempt to open my mind and see what the clubs management are doing in their decision making.

For example, it is clear and obvious why Mohamed Elneny has signed a one year extension.

He has proven himself time and again to be a reliable, if unexceptional, midfield. Elneny is adequate cover for Thomas Partey.

We have other areas of the pitch which need drastic improvement and investment. Elneny staying for another year allows us to focus on those areas.

In 12 months time, we might be looking to invest in a replacement for Partey rather than an understudy, if his injury issues continue.

It makes a lot of sense to keep Elneny, continue developing Albert Sambi Lokonga, and make a decision on that position next summer.

The pending Eddie Nketiah contractual renewal is not as easy to justify. But I have given it a go.

Eddie’s Improvement

With us short on strikers and Alexandre Lacazette ill and out of form, Eddie was given the opportunity at Arsenal that he has waited his entire short career for. And he stepped up.

In those final 8 games of the season, he scored 5 goals (compared to Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang scored 4 in last 12).

Every since he was young, he has always been a deadly goal scorer. But it was his all round play that really impressed me.

He was no longer the weak, gangly kid that only came to life when their was a sniff of a goal. He has filled out and come in leaps of bounds.

His hold up play impressed me as much as his goals to games.

We need a striker that is able to hold the ball up, bring others into play. As well as run the channels and press. Eddie has shown all of this in that short stint.

Whether this marked improvement is enough to see him be our 2nd choice striker is exactly the reason why many are questioning the contract renewal.

Europa League Consequence

Is the contract renewal a consequence of our failure to make Champions League football?

We all probably expected the club to make 2 forward signings this summer. But with no Champions League football, can we get away with just one and promoting Eddie?

The premier forward signing then starts in the league, and Eddie starts in Europe and the cups. Workload shared.

We struggled for so long trying to accommodate Aubameyang and Lacazette with no Champions League football, often to the detriment of both.

Does it just make more sense to have a clear number 1 and number 2 driver (F1 reference) rather than two fighting it out for the top spot?

But is Eddie good enough to come in for 20-30 games if whoever else we sign picks up a long-term injury?

Gabriel Jesus Incoming

It is becoming fairly clear and obvious that Gabriel Jesus will be an Arsenal player next season.

Fed up with being an “in and out” player at Manchester City, not getting the consistency of starts, he desires a move to fulfil his potential.

I would be very surprised if we signed him only to also buy another similar level striker (Alexander Isak, Dominc Calvert-Lewin, etc) and told him to fight it out. I think he would not join.

That then leaves us looking at an understudy for Jesus rather than competition.

So the level below those mentioned above is the likes of Ivan Toney and Ollie Watkins. But are these that much better than Nketiah to justify a £40million transfer fee?

Both Toney and Watkins are better than Nketiah, but both also more than 3 years older.

I would expect if Nketiah was playing for Brentford or Aston Villa, playing week in week out, he would quickly reach their level and surpass how many goals they score.

So instead of splashing out a big transfer fee on an average English striker, it makes sense to give more opportunities to the lad we have who is at a similar level

And Other Targets

Like with Elneny, keeping Nketiah frees up the cash to sign other targets.

People have mentioned the £100,000 salary, but if we let him leave and signed Watkins or Toney they would also want a similar salary. The only difference is keeping Nketiah will save us £40million.

This £40million could be spent on someone like Cody Gakpo who has the raw talent to be better than them all.

Gakpo is a left winger for PSV Eindhoven. He can play in all 3 positions behind the striker and there is a feeling with his physical attributes he could play up top.

Keeping Nketiah potentially opens the door for his signing.

Gakpo will be competition for Gabriel Martinelli on the left hand side and cover for Bukayo Saka on right hand side. Alongside Emile Smith Rowe, we would then have 4 decent wide options (Nicolas Pepe will leave).

Up top, we would have Jesus and Nketiah. But also Martinelli and Gakpo.

If you take the forwards as a group: Jesus, Nketiah, Saka, Gabriel, Gakpo, Smith Rowe. 6 players for 3 positions.

There has also been a lot of talk about Adam Hložek in recent weeks.

The Czech striker looks a star in the making. But is just 19-years-old.

Can I see a situation where we sign him (for a reported £19m) to be long term competition for Jesus? Yes. But in the short term we need to keep Nktieah around to bridge that gap, allowing us to develop Hložek over the next 12 months or more rather than throw him into the deep end.


In summary, with Europa League rather than Champions League football, one top striker is all that is on the shopping list this summer.

We need to spend sensibly and £40million on a back up striker is not prudent.

There is also a lack of decent options out there. The likes of Calvert-Lewin and Isak are too expensive (if we sign Jesus). Whilst Toney and Watkins are no better than Nketiah.

Final thought: Do many clubs across Europe have two top strikers any more? Liverpool, Manchester City, Chelsea and Tottenham all rely on just one. And then invest heavier into wide forwards that fill in down the middle when required.

Keenos