Category Archives: Arsenal

Arsenal pair set for imminent departure

Last night saw the PFA Player of the Year awards. Long time readers of the blog will know I do not care much for individual honours such as these or the Ballon d’Or.

For those interested, Phil Foden won POTY for its Cole Palmer name Young Player of the Year.

David Raya, Willliam Saliba, Gabriel, Martin Odegaard and Declan Rice all made the Team of the Year. But ultimately it means nothing if you end the season without a trophy.

Eddie Nketiah was linked to Nottingham Forest as Arsenal rejected a £25m offer.

As with the Marseille deal, this lead to some complain that we should just accept the deal. But in an era that is seeing Armando Broja leave for £30m, I think Arsenal are right to stand by their valuation.

Marseille’s offer was £17m upfront with £6m of add-ons. Nottingham Forests was £20m upfront with £5m add-ons.

I do laugh when the same fans that criticise the club for underselling players and then calling for the club to undersell a player.

With Dominic “one good season” Solanke going for £65m, we need to maximise or transfer fee. Put £30m upfront on the table and the deal will be done.

Eddie clearly does not not expect to be at the club next season. He has relinquished his club box, which was being cleared out earlier this week.

If Nketiah departs, we will need a new forward. But that does not mean we need a new striker.

We play one up top, so only really need to strikers. In Kai Havertz and Gabriel Jesus we have that.

Across the front three though we have 5 men for 3 positions (without Nketiah or Reiss Nelson). That is one short.

So either we sign a striker, and Jesus becomes a more regular option on the wing, or we buy a new winger and Jesus’s primary job continues to be Kai Havertz competition and cover.

As predicted earlier this summer, Aaron Ramsdale is likely to exit us on loan, with Wolves making an offer.

Any deal will see the buying club pay 100% of his wages and a loan fee of around £4m. Those numbers will ensure Ramsdale does not cost us a penny this season.

With Arsenal holding out for £40m for England’s number two, the loan should not be surprising. Most teams do not have that sort of money to spend on a keeper, especially one who has not played for a year.

Spending the next season on loan should see his value increase again and we should expect to sell in 12 months for £30m+. That will see us bank a nice chick if PSR book value profit.

Enjoy your Wednesday.

Keenos

Where has all the oil money gone?

A year ago, the Saudi Pro League were disrupting the transfer market, with clubs spending nearly £1bn combined. Only the Premier League clubs had a larger combined spend for 2023/24.

This year, Saudi clubs have spent just £15om between them. That is less than Chelsea have spent alone – and pretty much the same as what the likes of Aston Villa, Brighton and Manchester United have spent this summer.

So what is happening out their in the Middle East?

Players do not want to go

Players talk. And perhaps more importantly, players wives and girlfriends talk.

Aymeric Laporte spoke last year about how players were “dissatisfied”. The Spanish defender went on to raise issues from working conditions, quality of life and broken promises.

Many WAGs dreamed of a Dubai style living experience, but have quickly realised that Saudi Arabia living is very different to that in the Emirate city, with many players deciding to live in the more liberal Bahrain. As Laporte, put it, “you spend a lot of time in the car” due to having to commute across borders and because of traffic.

The conditions have already seen the exodus of players – most notably Jordan Henderson how only last half a season. Joining the ex-England captain in the departure lounge are the likes of Ivan Rakitic, Allan Saint-Maximin, David Ospina, Matheus Pereira and Andre Gray.

12-months ago, many players would have been saying to their agents “I will have a bit of that. See what you can do”. This summer and it appears players are less willing to manufacture of a move for themselves.

Players waiting for European offers

There has been a bit of head scratching around Ivan Toney, who looks destined to move to Saudi Arabia in the next 10 days. “I am surprised a top English team have not taken a punt” seems to be the consensus.

I am sure every Premier League club, including Manchester City, Arsenal and Liverpool, would have have had a look at Toney and had a discussion with his representatives. they have all been put off by what they have either seen or head.

It might be due to Toney’s wage demands (reported to be £250k a week), concerns about his attitude, or just his poor form since returning from his transfer ban. With doors closing around England, and none opening further afield in Europe, the only opportunity left on the table was Saudi Arabia.

I am fairly positive that had an English team come in for Toney, he would have preferred to remain in England. A move to Saudi Arabia was probably his last resort.

And you have to wonder how many other players are currently sitting their thinking “yes, I will go to Saudi Arabia, but I would prefer to stay in Europe if that is possible”.

The likes of Raheem Sterling, Ben Chillwell, Reiss Nelson, Romelu Lukaku and Jadon Sancho might all decide last minute to go to Saudi Arabia for the year if other deals fail to materilise.

Saudi Arabia will end up becoming a players “second choice”. The UEL of football.

Investors losing interest

The Saudi Pro League was always an exercise in sportswashing.

Alongside “Riyadh season”, which has taken boxing, F1, snooker, WWE, MMA, snooker and various European “super cups” to the capital, the Pro-League was all about buying a fan base to try and take the narrative on Saudi Arabia away from their horrendous human rights record.

Football has failed to take off in Saudi Arabia, with the 18 clubs averaging just 8,158 across the 2023/24 season. Al-Ahli SFC had the highest average with 23,370. But with the King Abdullah Sports City stadium holding in excess of 60,000, the 2/3s empty stadium was an embarrassment.

There was also a lack of interest in the Saudi Pro League outside of the country. With hardly anyone tuning in and TV companies reluctant to pay for the rights.

Just 5,000 viewers tuned into watch the top of the table clash between Al-Hilal and Al-Ittihad on Canel+. That is less than what watched FC Rouen against Sochaux-Montbéliard in the Championnat National (2rd tier of French football) on the same channel.

Despite signing La Liga legends Cristiano Ronaldo and Karim Benzema, the Spanish TV deal was worth just €60,000, whilst DAZN paid just $500k for the rights to screen games in the UK, Germany and Austria for 2023/24.

The rulers of Saudi Arabia do not like being embarrassed, and the Saudi Pro League is an embarrassment.

Low attendances and low TV viewing figures. It is clear that no one cares about the Saudi Pro League. And if no one cares it cares for the league, than it is no longer a useful tool in Saudi Arabia’s sportswashing campaign.

History repeating itself

The Saudi Pro League is facing the same issues as the Chinese Super League in the 2010s and the MLS in the 70s.

You simply can not start a league, splash loads of cash on ageing stars, and buy your way into popularity. Football, with its tribalism’s, does not work like that. A league can not simply become an overnight success just because they but some over-the-hill legends.

Add in the living and working conditions, and broken promises, the Saudi Pro League is just history repeating itself.

The downfall of the Chinese Super League was caused by the oversaturation of ageing foreign stars, who found themselves living in poor conditions with unpaid wages mounting up. Newly formed teams also suffered from “lack of competitive spirit“. It is a mirror image as to what has happened in Saudi Arabia in the past 12 months.

Summary

I expect some players to make the move late in the transfer window to the Saudi Pro League. But those players are only going to the Middle East because no other options materialised.

They will likely move across their on short term deals, to play a bit of football and get huge wages, before looking to engineer a way back into European football in 12 months

For many players, Saudi Arabia is not the destination of choice. It is a last resort. And that is why Saudi clubs have spent less combined then some Premier League teams!

Keenos

Arsenal playing long game in Ivan Toney transfer saga

Over the last 12 months I have a love / hate relationship with Ivan Toney.

At the moment, I am in the “hate it” stage of our relationship. At 28-years-old, with his reported attitude problems and coming off a ban, I would not want us to be paying the £60m+ Brentford were demanding on him.

But then I also think of Ian Wright.

Wrighty joined The Arsenal in the early 90s at 28-year-old. He arrived with his own historical baggage and reports of attitude problems. He would go on to break our long-standing goalscoring record.

Ivan Toney was a notable absentee in the opening weekend of Premier League fixtures. He is also yet to appear for Brentford in pre-season having returned late having been with England over the summer. Reports are he was left out as he has made it clear to Thomas Frank that he wants to leave this summer.

There is now a stalemate between Brentford, Toney and any potential suitors.

Brentford want a huge transfer fee for a 28-year-old who has played little football in 12-months. Meanwhile Toney wants to leave and only has one-year left on his contract. We are now in a game of poker.

As we close in on transfer deadline day, the asking price for Toney will rapidily decrease. what was £60m+ is now reportedly only £40m. I would not be surprised if come the end of August, we are talking about a fee in the region of £30m. And that is a price I would love for Toney.

It is no secret that we are in the market for a new forward. And it is also no secret that Mikel Arteta is happy with Kai Havertz and Gabriel Jesus.

A new incoming striker would have to either be better than the pair, or be cheap enough that they could be competition and cover for Havertz, with Jesus then becoming competition and cover for the wingers. At £30m, Toney would be a good competition and cover for Havertz.

Toney’s acquisition would then see Jesus become the competition for Gabriel Martinelli on the left wing and cover for Bukayo Saka on the right that many have been crying out for. The Brazilian is two players in one, and he would continue to be an option upfront.

Role forward a year, and we may then decide to cash in on Jesus and sign a top quality left winger who is an improvement on Martinelli, with Gabi Martinelli then becoming the back-up winger / 3rd choice forward.

This can all only happen if a deal for Toney makes financial sense.

Toney has his aforementioned attitude problems. In every interview he has done in the last 12-months he has talking about his wish to leave Brentford. And just 4 goals in 17 games since returning from his ban perhaps shows a player who has some of his sharpness, motivation or enthusiasm.

When you consider that Spurs have spent £65m on Dominic Solanke (18 months Toney’s junior), then anything under £40m for Toney will be a great deal.

One stumbling block for Arsenal could be Manchester City.

Having sold Julian Alvarez for £80m, City no longer have cover for Erling Haaland. Toney could just as easily fulfil that role as he would be cover and competition for Havertz.

Whilst Man City would offer him a better chance of trophies, Arsenal would offer him more opportunities for minutes to stay in London.

The longer Toney stays at Brentford without playing, the cheaper he gets. And the cheaper her gets, the more interested teams will become.

Do Arsenal want Toney?
Will Toney want to be 2nd choice at Arsenal?
How cheap will Brentford go to?
How much will Arsenal be willing to pay?
Will Man City be a factor?
And could Eddie Nketiah go the other way?

Let us know your thoughts.

Keenos