Arsenal set for last dance in a season that was not mean to happen!

It was always unlikely that Arsenal would end up winning the Premier League this season, even when we appeared to be a long way clear.

Of course, we were never that far in front because of City having games in hand and a home match to play against Arsenal. In fact, one of the most annoying things for supporters of a certain other club, and the baiters on Talk Sport, is that apart from the odd armchair fan none of us ever gave it the bigg’un about how we were going to win the league.

I only ever heard it sung once, and that was at Fulham during an imperious first-half display that saw us sweep them aside. With hindsight, the second-half that day should have resonated with us all far more than it did at the time as the way we stopped playing and invited pressure would become an important feature.

There was only one point in the entire season when I started to think we were actually going to win it, that Arsenal would be Champions by the end of this coming Sunday afternoon.

It was when we went 2-0 up at Anfield and the players were tearing them to shreds, just like they’d done to Fulham.

Arsenal were so good and were destroying a side that had recently stuck 7 (seven) past Manchester United in the same ground. I genuinely allowed myself, for the first time in 19 years, to think my team were going to win the Premier League.

I fear that the players had exactly the same thought, at exactly the same time, and they froze at the prospect. Just when it mattered, our inexperienced, and unfancied, contenders seemed to know they’d became favourites and perhaps couldn’t handle it.

In the last minute of the game they might still have rescued the win but poor decision making and a poor pass saw us fail to capitalise on a 3 v 2 situation. That is the same thing should happen in an identical fashion 7 days later at West Ham, and throw in a missed penalty to the same failure to exploit a 3 v 2, and the evidence is probably there for us all.

It was further compounded with the failure to beat bottom of the table Southampton at home at the end of the week. That period of three games when it really mattered are allowed Manchester City to close the gap prior to their game against us.

None of this is to say that these players have anything to be ashamed of.

They were trying to stop a financial behemoth, which has not had to play the same “game” as everyone else and, yes, I’m being careful with my words.

Arsenal’s young team has gone toe-to-toe with possibly the strongest squad ever assembled in English football and pushed them almost all the way. Sadly our players have reserved their two worst performances of the season for our most recent fixtures against Brighton and Forest.

For most of the previous 35 games, they’ve done us proud and never once looked like they weren’t trying. Every single one of them has played their hearts out pretty much all the way through.

Injuries at the wrong time have really cost us, especially Saliba of course, but also perhaps unnoticed those to Tomiyasu and Elneny at a time when others needed resting or to shore things up.

My only real criticism of Arteta this season beyond a lot of the substitutions he makes is the fact Zinchenko stayed in the side until he was injured, with most of our problems coming from that side of the defence fairly consistently when we’ve struggled – the treatment of Tierney (and Smith Rowe) has been baffling to me.

The real shame for these boys is that they end the season without a trophy. Nobody remembers runners-up, however unlikely they might have been to contend back in August when literally nobody picked Arsenal as a challenger to Manchester City.

If ever 2nd place was an achievement then perhaps this season was it. And what a ride they’ve given us with so many memorable moments:

Beating Spurs comfortably home and away, winning at home to Liverpool, the 2nd half at home to West Ham on Boxing Day, the last minute win (while absolutely battering) Manchester United, a New Year spanking of Brighton away, the aforementioned stuffing of Fulham, two wins over Chelsea, a great win at St James’ Park to put Howe in his place, the emergence of William Saliba, Ben White being outstanding, Gabriel looking a great centre-half, Ramsdale making some of the most memorable saves in years, Granit Xhaka’s redemption, Martinelli and Saka coming of age, Odegaard looking like our best player since Alexis (possibly since Bergkamp), Eddie proving almost all his doubters wrong, the last minute win at Villa, and not forgetting Reiss Nelson. 

How could you ever forget Reiss Nelson? That lad has proved himself this season and I hope to God we get him a new contract, an ideal understudy and challenger to Saka and Martinelli.

The sensational winning goal he scored against Bournemouth, whether he stays or goes, will never be forgotten by any of us privileged enough to have been there. What a moment. What an atmosphere. What a noise. What a celebration.

For that moment alone Arsenal deserved to win something this season, but alas it was not to be. If I take nothing else from this season, I’ll always have Reiss Nelson’s goal at home to Bournemouth and a moment in time that will live forever.

The challenge for Arteta and Edu now is to try and recruit players who make us stronger, while not upsetting the spirit of this squad. No mean task that. And it will cost us a lot of money, while shipping some dead wood that still belongs to us. 

Next season will come around before we know it. But before that the players have one more game to play and I hope that everyone in the stadium on Sunday (I’ll be one of them) gives them the ovation they deserve for everything they’ve done for us this year. And we’ll never forget Reiss Nelson.

Dover Marksman

Nelson new deal signifies Smith Rowe’s exit

I have previously made my opinion on Reiss Nelson clear.

Nelson is not good enough for Arsenal, and his 10 seconds of greatness against Bournemouth does not change that.

I think it is clear that Mikel Arteta also does not fancy him – Nelson has played just 5% of the available this season, highlighting that the Spaniard does not think he is adequete cover or competition for Bukayo Saka.

Nelson has started just 1 Premier League game this season, showing that Arteta does not think Nelson is an option on the right when he wants to give Saka a rest.

Yesterday the news broke that Nelson had agreed a new 4-year deal with Arsenal, following in the footsteps of Saka’s new deal.

Whilst I do not think Nelson is good enough for The Arsenal, that does not mean I do not understand the reasoning for his new deal.

Arsenal have other positions to financially prioritise

We are in the market for at least one new central midfielder – Declan Rice seems to be the top target.

That signing alone will take up a huge chunk of our transfer budget – I expect us to spend £100-150m depending on sales.

On top of the Rice deal, we need a new central defender or full back.

It is a central defender if we choose to continue with Ben White and Takehiro Tomiyasu at right back. It is a new full back if the team want White to be Saliba’s cover and Tomiyasu to also cover Olexsandr Zinchenko.

I expect that player to be signed for in the region of £15-20m.

Rice and the new defensive option will take us above the £100million mark. There is talk that we are also chasing a 2nd central midfielder (Caicedo, Mount, Zubimendi the names mentioned). That will be the £150m+ spent. We would not have much left in the tank to buy someone who is good enough to compete with Saka.

How about a new striker?

Nelson remaining shows the club might have decided to go down the “new striker” route, rather than sign a winger that can play upfront.

Say we do stretch that transfer budget through generating some exceptional sales, the decision might have been made that another striker is what is coming in.

We might be targetting someone like Dusan Valhovic, or Ivan Toney. And as a sacrifice we will not buy a new winger.

If that happens, we still have plenty of options outwide – Saka, Gabriel Martinelli, Leandro Trossard, Gabriel Jesus and Nelson.

Trossard has proved himself to be a very good signing. His versatility means that he will probably be the 2nd choice on both flanks. A new striker would allow us to utilise Jesus outwide.

So if a new striker comes in, Nelson becomes the 5th choice winger. And would only really play if 3 out of the 5 men ahead of him are out.

This summer, we could ivnest in a 1st/2nd choice striker, or a 4th choice winger. We have spoken about the need to improve the squad by buying players who would be part of a 18 man first team. Moving away from having “1st XI / 2nd XI”. A new striker would certainly follow the philosophy. A 4th choice winger would not.

Emile Smith Rowe exit

A new deal confirms what we have been told, that Emile Smith Rowe will leave this summer.

If Smith Rowe was part of Arteta’s plans, there would be no need to keep Nelson. ESR would play that back-up winger role.

Now a debate can be had over who we should be keeping? Nelson or Smith Rowe.

Smith Rowe is the better player. He is more versatile, can play on both flanks and inside. But he also raises the most funds.

If we are talking about Smith Rowe and Nelson being 5th choice winger, then you sell the one that generates the most money.

Nelson’s contract was set to expire in a month. The most Arsenal would get is £6-8 million compensation if he joined an English team. I would expect Smith Rowe to go for between £20-30m.

£20-30m is a huge sum for a fringe player who has played just 226 minutes this season and is 5th choice. It is money that can be reinvested in the top end of the squad.

Smith Rowe has already arguably been replaced by Trossard. The Belgium is the superior player and, importantly, does not have Smith Rowe’s history of injuries.

A few years ago we made the mistake of not cashing in on Ainsley Maitland-Niles.

In 2020, we closed the door on a £20m move to Wolves for Maitland-Niles. He has played just 748 minutes of Premier League football for Arsenal since we turned down that bid.

That £20m could have been invested elsewhere over the last 3 years. And likewise, turning down £30m+ for Smith Rowe would be a bad decision considering how little game time he will see if we improve the top end of the squad.

So what makes sense is Smith Rowe is moved on. We pocket £30m which gets reinvested. And Nelson takes the role of a 5th choice winger. For a year at least.

Nelson will still leave

If Nelson is only 5th choice winger, and we buy a top striker this summer, he will see very little game time. That means he will probably push to depart next summer.

The new deal will mean that we would get a half decent fee in a years time. And then that money can be reinvested.

A new winger next year

Finally, Nelson staying does not mean a new winger will not join Arsenal. It just means it will probably happen next year.

If we do the business we want to do this year – say Rice, Caicedo, Toney and Sluto – then next summer is when we will go for another top winger.

We should not do a Chelsea. Bring in loads of players in a single season, put them all on long contracts and pray it works. You are basically morgaging your future.

We need to get the squad in a position that Manchester United were in the last 90s / early 00s. The position that Manchester City are in now.

You want to only be making one or two big signings a season. But those two big signings dramatically improve your squad.

Next summer is when we recruit a top level winger. Someone better than Trossard that pushes the Belgium down a level in the pecking order. And as a result pushes Nelson out.

Make small, consistent improvements to your squad is how you stay at the top. It is when clubs make big changes they suffer.


My position on Nelson has not changed. I do not think he is good enough for Arsenal.

But if his new deal results in us spending £150m+ on Rice, Caicedo, Sluto and another top striker, then I am happy. Over to you Edu…

PS: I have seen some comment “why is this deal getting done before William Saliba’s. That should have been a priority”. Learn how business works. Just because one deal happens before another, it does not mean it was prioritised. It just means it was agreed earlier.

Football is not linear. You do not work on one deal at the time, and then only work on the next deal once the first one has been completed. Edu and his team will be in multiple discussions with multiple players over new deals. They all just get completed at a different pace.

And it is the same for transfers. Some just take longer than others to get over the line. Just because the first signing of the season might be an unknown, might not be Declan Rice, it does not mean that we prioritised that deal. It just means that deal happened quicker.

Keenos

Mikel Arteta is the man who can deliver another Anfield ‘89 moment (we just have to stick with him)

Morning all.

As the season rolls into its final game, I just wanted to take a moment to reflect on what happened 34 years ago. Anfield ‘89.

There will never be another finish to a top flight English like what happened between Arsenal and Liverpool. It is the greatest finish to a league season ever.

Sky might try and portray the Aguero moment as the greatest ending, but that is only because they promote the “football only started in 1992” mantra

Thomas, charging through the midfield…Thomas…it’s up for grabs now!!!!

The usual suspects have popped up recently claiming Mikel Arteta should be sacked having failed to win the league.they have been using pictures of the side in 89, in 91, in 98 and 2004 to show what winners are.

We won the league in 89, correct. But in 1988 we finished 6th, having finished 4 in ‘87. If Twitter and social media was around then, these clout chasing fans would have been calling for George Graham’s head at the end of 88.

And no Graham, no Anfield 89.

In 1990, we then dropped to 4th. Modern fans would have been screaming for Graham to be sacked. “Chelsea would have sacked him, they show ambition and don’t accept 4th place”.

A year later, The Arsenal won the league losing just one game. Almost invincible.

Many of these fans grew up on the early Arsene Wenger era, when it was 1st or 2nd for nearly a decade. I remember talking to mates at a time and we agreed we were spoiled during that era.

8 years of never finishing below 2nd. Three league titles, 1 unbeaten. Four FA Cup wins. Two European finals (both lost).

Football is a very different place right now. We have state owned teams that can afford to pay players more in bonus’s than any other player receives in salary in the league (Haaland is reportedly due to get £27.5m in bonuses from Manchester City this season if they win the Champions League).

We have seen one of the greatest Liverpool sides in history end up with just a single league title, despite continually getting 90+ points. It just shows how hard it is to win the Premier League.

Liverpool’s only league title, and the only time in the last 6-years City didn’t win it – came during Covid. And Manchester City accumulated just 81 points.

We now live in a Manchester City world. They will consistently get 90+ points. And the only way other teams will get a sniff is if they have an off season.

And this season, on course to get 92 points, is certainly not an off season.

Anyone who sets their standard of failure bar as “anything below winning the title” is in for a tough life.

We have won just 13 league titles in 135 years. Those great wins of 89 and 91 were spliced between some poor seasons.

I have always wondered if those claiming to have “high standards” apply it to their own life? Or are they just unemployed, living in a Spanish bedsit.

This has been a fantastic season. A year where fans have grown closer to players once again. The ground has been rocking. Away ends bouncing.

If you are an Arsenal fan and have not been able to enjoy this season, then maybe football is not for you.

And if you are demanding Arteta’s head after he took us to second, well shame on you. Sacking a manager whilst on a journey does not lead to success.

Want another ‘89? Stick with Arteta.

Keenos