Would James Maddison and Houssem Aouar be upgrade on Hale End pair?

Emile Smith Rowe and Joe Willock had fantastic ends to last season.

Joe Willock on loan at Newcastle was key to their survival scoring 8 goals in 14 games; whilst Smith Rowe became a key player in Arsenal’s revival in the 2nd half of the season.

But we might be in a situation where both end up leaving the club this summer.

Now over the years, I have been a huge champion of our academy and the fact that we now have so many academy graduates in and around the first team is something to be excited about.

But that does not mean we need to keep every single one.

Last season Arsenal were crying out for creativity and goals from midfield.

Smith Rowe provided the creativity and Willock showed for Newcastle that he can score the goals.

It is not hard to make the argument that both should be part of Mikel Arteta’s plans next season.

But what then happens when upgrades on the pair are available? And offers come in for them that are just too much to turn down?

Houssem Auoar is a player Arsenal have chased for some time.

He risks becoming a Julian Draxler-esque where we are linked every summer but never actually sign him.

If he were to join Arsenal, it would be this summer or never.

Last summer Lyon were demanding a £55.5m transfer fee for a player who was considered one of the hottest prospects in Europe.

12 months on and Lyon would reportedly accept a bid in the region of £25m.

A mixture of his drop in form, Lyon’s financial woes and Auoar having a year left on his contract has seen his price plummet.

Capable of playing left, right and centre behind a striker as well as deeper in an “8” role, Auoar is exactly the type of player we need to add to the squad. And at £25m we would be getting an absolute steal.

Still just 23-years-old, Auoar would start ahead of both Smith Rowe and Willock.

James Maddison was perhaps unlucky to make the England squad as Gareth Southgate went for Phil Foden, Mason Mount and Jack Grealish as his attacking midfield options.

“It’s an area of the pitch where we have unbelievable competition for places,” Southgate said during his squad announcement. “We just feel there are players ahead of James in those areas of the pitch.

Maddison’s season was hampered due to various injuries knee, hamstring and hip injuries.

It is the hip injury that is most concerning as he picked it up taking a corner and since his return Youri Tielemans has remained on set pieces.

Taking into account the quality of Maddison’s delivery, you have to assume that his absence from corners and free kicks is due to that hip injury.

I remember watching Maddison during his Coventry games and one thing that always stuck in my mind was his “unusual” technique of striking the ball – he tended to hit the ball with the back of the inside of his foot rather than middle.

This technique alongside the power and whip he gets on the ball puts a lot of strain on the hip. And if surgery has restricted his movement in that area, he might never be the same player again.

We would have to assume if he were to join Arsenal, we would give him a thorough medical to ensure that hip is 100%.

With 27 goals in his last 3 seasons, Maddison would certainly give something Arsenal are missing.

His striking of the ball from outside the area would also be a game changer when teams are sitting deep.

For Leicester City he has played left, right and centrally, showing that he has the versatility to rotate in and out of different positions – a key factor under Arteta as he looks to bamboozle opponents with attackers swapping positions during games.

A fee of £60m does seem big taking into account his recent injury record – but if he is fully fit it is probably his “market price” when you see what other attacking midfielders might go for this summer.

It is similar to the fee that is being floated around for Grealish, who I would say a fit and firing Maddison is on par with.

Aston Villa paid £38 million for Emi Buendia and are reportedly chasing Smite Rowe for a similar value. Maddison is more established and influential than both of these.

So with Maddison and Auoar potentially available for a combined £85million, and Willock and Smith Rowe being linked away for around £55million combined, should Arsenal sell 2 and invest a further £30million?

You perhaps have to be cruel to be kind.

Are Maddison and Auoar better than Smith Rowe and Willock? I would say yes. Would getting the pair for a net of £30million be a great deal? I would say yes. So should we upgrade? Probably.

I think the more likely solution is we end up with one – probably Auoar.

Auoar would then be alongside Smith Rowe competing to play with Nicolas Pepe and Bukayo Saka behind Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang up top.

But then Maddison, Auoar, Pepe and Saka as options behind the striker would be even more powerful.

The final thought is the last scenario is 4 players for 3 positions. Is that enough? Could we actually also keep Smith Rowe alongside Maddison and Auoar giving us 5 options behind Aubameyang.

Would Smith Rowe be happy with being 5th choice? And would Arsenal be crazy to turn down such a big offer from Villa? And can we afford to turn it down if we target both Maddison and Auoar?

Plenty to think about over your lunch break.

Keenos

2 thoughts on “Would James Maddison and Houssem Aouar be upgrade on Hale End pair?

  1. Free

    This is a great piece, very thought provoking and a higher than usual standard to the normal trash that is churned out on most blogs simply for clinks.

    I didnt realise that he cannot take corners or freekicks because of his hip surgery.
    I am huge fan of Maddison and put him in the same class as Grealish.

    The hip surgery and it’s potential long term effects on his game have to be carefully analysed by our medical team.
    Because if he loses his set piece delivery from his arsenal that will take alot of value from him as a player.

    Bare in mind ESR is also injury prone as well. ESR Dow does not have the greatest engine. If he is overplayed he will break down.

    I never even considered a sale of him, but for a medically cleared Maddison an Auror, along with Lokonga and maybe a Zakaria then I would be ok with it.

    The key is getting Maddison medically cleared and then be able to actually buy him as well because he will be 80m not 60m.

    ESR is a great young player but he is levels below Maddison right now. He woud need around three years to get to Maddison level assuming injuries don’t curtial his progress.

    I believe we should get Maddison, Auror, keep ESR, get rid of William, Nelson, Eddie and then have space for all of them to play.

    We need a strong squad to challenge.Man City has De Bruyne, Silva, Foden, Sterling, Mahrez etc

    Like

    Reply
  2. Akan

    Pointless comparisons,, we are losing 3 midfield players in Xhaka, “phew at last” Oddegard, and Ceballos, we should, must keep both Joe Willock and Smith Rowe who at ages 21 and 20 respectively are better long term prospects. Aouar is not proven in premiership conditions, both Joe Willock and Smith Rowe are

    Like

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.