In Defence of Diaby

So this mornings Arsenal news has, unsurprisingly, caused mass hysteria amongst our the fan base.

This mornings hysteria

This mornings hysteria

It is being reported that Arsene Wenger is planning to offer Abou Diaby a new contract, this despite him missing the majority of the last 4 seasons.

Dibay Appearances

On the face of it, I can understand the mass hysteria. The fact we are considering offering a new contract to someone who has played so few games over the last 4 seasons is unacceptable, especially as we seem to refuse to invest in players who actually have a chance of getting on the pitch.

But let’s look beyond the headlines for a second. What does Wenger actually say?

“If he comes back, I will keep him. I always believed in him. In football, the most important thing is health.”

So yes, he is indicating that Diaby could get a new contract. But this is only on the basis of him returning and being healthy.

This is what the headlines fail to explain. They are sensationalist. Aimed to drive sales, to get web hits (we know all this already).

Tweets

 

I have to echo what Tim Stillman has said on Twitter. Arsene Wenger was asked directly about the future of Abou Diaby and replied very diplomatically. The last thing he is going to say is, top quote Tim, that is “doesn’t matter what happens, he’s a goner”.

By saying “if he comes back I will keep him” he is offering a carrot. Diaby probably full well knows that he will leave us at the end of the season, but as long as there is a little bit of light at the end of the tunnel, he will continue to work hard and get himself fit. And even if he does not get himself fit for Arsenal, he could put himself in a position to get himself fit for a contract with another club.

Were Wenger to shut that door, he might as well tell Diaby not to bother turning up to London Colney for the next 7 months. At the end of the day, whilst footballers are well paid (Diaby has been paid £24m over the past 4 years) they are still human beings. They still need to be treated with respect and compassion.

Arsene Wenger also has to look at the moral of the entire squad. Abou Diaby has been at Arsenal for 8 years. Whilst he does not deserve a new contract, he also does not deserve to be simply thrown on the scrap heap. I am sure he is very popular amongst teams, and I have heard he has done a lot of work on the training ground with youngsters and new signings. It would be ludicrous for Wenger to destroy not only the moral of Diaby, but the morale of fellow team mates, perhaps struggling with injury (Wilshere/Ramsey) by being so callous as to say in an interview “Diaby is a goner”.

On to Diaby himself.

I feel he has been in for a lot of unfair criticism. This is a player who, at 21, suffered a horrendous injury, which required 3 surgeries to repair and was told he might never play again. He battled back from this injury and, despite set backs, played 76 games in 2008/09 – 2009/10.

It was at this point Diaby got his current contract. The 5 year deal he has sat on. Having played 76 games in 2 seasons, he would have deserved the deal. The signs were he was over his previous injury, and moving forward to become a top player. He was still just 24.

For those who say he did not deserve this contract, think for a moment.

Robin van Persie left Arsenal at the end of the 2011/12 season. We lost him (and on the cheap) as he only had one year left on his contract. When he left, we all kicked off and moaned, that van Persie had been allowed to run his contract down to one year to go. That the previous year, he should have been offered a new deal, securing his future for the next 5 years.

In those previous years, van Persie played 52 games for Arsenal. That is 24 less than Diaby. So on one hand we moan that Diaby was given a new contract, on the other we moan that van Persie was.

Football is very easy in hindsight. Yes, it seems mad now that 5 years ago, Diaby was offered a new contract, but the future is hard to predict. At the time, it was the correct decision.

In the autumn of 2010 Diaby was the recipient of a further two horror tackles. Firstly in September 2010 by Paul Robinson, then a month latter by Michael Essien. All 3 horror tackles were on the same right ankle.

After the Essien tackle, Diaby played a further 14 games for Arsenal that season, and another 22 since.

He was on the verge of a full recovery, he had his new contract, and then disaster struck. Who could have foreseen that Diaby would have suffered 2 tackles in such a short space of time on the same ankle as what he broke and fractured a couple of years earlier?

Anyone who sits and says Diaby did not deserve his new contract in 2010 is an idiot. You are talking in hindsight, not knowing – or accepting – the fact. 76 games in the 2 previous years.

Yes, he has earnt £24m in ‘sick pay’ as I have seen one person put it. But this is the risk with contracts. This could happen to anyone. We could, have offered van Persie a 5 year deal before the 2010/11 season, he could have continued his poor injury record, and we would all be moaning that he got a new deal.

All contracts are a gamble. An injury could happen at any time that ruins a career, as seen with Diaby. A player could go completely off the boil, like Fernando Torres at Chelsea. In both scenario’s, you end up with a very expensive bench / medical bed warmer. But it is a gamble you take.

The only way to avoid the gamble is to offer shorter term contracts. 2 years. That way if a player picks up an injury, you are reducing the time until his contract runs out until you can release him on a free. But this is a risk, as it puts you in a scenario where every summer you need to be offering the players new contracts to secure their future.

As for people who say ‘we should have sold him’. Get your head out of the sand. How could we have sold him over the last 4 years? Who would have bought him? This is just crazy thinking.

Diaby has had a shocking career. Ruined by injury. That is not much that could have been done. The least we, as Arsenal fans, and the Arsenal management and medical team, can do is support him for the last 7 months of his contract. Let’s not throw him on the scrap heap whilst he is still Arsenal.

Keenos

 

We are preparing a protest , Wenger Out

Let’s face facts as a whole Arsenal fans of the last few years are pretty lame when it comes for sticking up for themselves, apart from one decent BSM ‘walk’ over that 6% ticket price increase. Prices since all-seater came in have just gone up and up and the promise of cheaper seats once we moved to the shinny new spacebowl was never going to happen and with no united Arsenal fan voice the club have pretty much done whatever they like with no real fuss from us. Oddly fans from other clubs have done more to embarrass the club with both Man City and Liverpool successfully getting the point across for the pricing of Cat A games.

Anyway onto Wenger, the argument of if hes the right man or not has finally been put to bed, no right minded person can now say he’s the right man to manage the club. I’m not calling him a C### I’m not wishing him anything but the best, I’m not acting like a tottenham fan and I’m not being knee jerk. Myself and the other admin on facebook.com/shewore have been very honest over the last 4years on our views and they haven’t changed, we must be saying something right to have the best part of 18,000 on the page, the vast majority being current or former match going fans, this aint a page with 100’s of moo moo comments on every status.

As for a Wenger out or any other protest I can tell everyone right now that none of the ‘official’ so-called supporters clubs who on a regular basis get invited to AGM’s, supporters forums, tea with Ivan etc, the people the club deem fit to speak on our behalf’s will arrange anything against Wenger’s time being well and truly up, the fools approved the highest non-corporate match ticket in Europe, that tells you all you need to know about them. None of the bigger Arsenal blogs will arrange a protest either over any kind of Wenger out and neither will I/we at SheWore, this should be down to the AST,AISA and RedAction to arrange, but of course they wont.

Over the 24 hours I/we have had about a dozen different people privately messaging me/us so we can help arrange their idea on a protest, my answer to them and anyone who ever asks in the future is DO IT get together with a few mates and do something. Trying to arrange and keep happy everyone on what slogan ? what game ? in the ground  ? before,after,during ? just will not happen, more chance herding cats. So my answer to everyone is simple and this is said with the up most respect, you do what you feel fit, don’t be a sheep, you don’t need someone else to tell what you can or cant do and when you can do it.

It costs very little to print or write on an A4 sheet of paper with the words WENGER OUT on it (for example), it costs very little if half a dozen of you get a small banner made up between you and I’m very sure by the messages we have received the other more imaginative of you can think of other things to do, just remember please don’t do anything that could lead to an arrest.  I’m very sure if you did this before/during/after the next few games you will soon find people on the streets and in the ground who will join you. Pass out the A4 sheets to people on the trains and buses, in the streets, in the pubs (or latte bar) and to people who sit around you, empower yourselves and the people around you.

Please don’t think that by joining a group on Facebook or moaning on twitter or even doing some direct action that you will get change, in fairness nothing we as fans do can persuade a lame duck CEO (who can’t sack his own employee) and a majority shareholder (who can vote to pay himself £3mill) apart from not going to games, but as we know by now the club will be more than happy to have 60,000 tourists at every game who will spend big in the club shop than people whose families have been going for generations and have a deep emotional involvement, so not going is a lose lose.

As some of the good lads and ladies who I stood alongside and spoken to who did try some direct action over last years 3% increase say, at least we did something, we didn’t just moan and do nothing, we tried. The club need a change at all levels, if we do not tell them, if we don’t get the message thro they will think we agree with the direction they are heading. I’m a firm believer that we are the club, not the owner, not a manager, not the players THE FANS. We will still be there after Wenger, Stan and there apologists have long gone.
Up The Arsenal….

wenger out

 

Swansea,Merson Knows+Wengers fault for not spending ?

Personnel Problems

Two games played in the last week and two games that exposed the already obvious personnel shortcomings in our squad. In the Anderlecht game, it was a combination of having no proper holding midfielder and playing a backup left back at centre half. Sound like a broken record much? The fact that not many Arsenal fans, or anyone else for that matter, was terribly surprised that we blew a three nil lead says it all really.

We are supposedly the fifth richest club in the world and yet started the season with only two established centre halves, a right sided midfielder converted to a holding role – whose legs have gone – and a headless chicken that we picked up on a free transfer. At 3-0 Anderlecht, didn’t have to do anything complicated, it was direct and it was effective. Granted the first goal was offside but the momentum of the game had already shifted at that stage and you would have fancied that the Belgians would have got the breakthrough anyway.

The penalty and equaliser came about because of route one balls targeting Monreal. Perhaps if we had a more effective holding midfielder or our advanced players weren’t still charging forward looking for another goal, Anderlecht wouldn’t have been able to play the balls in that exposed Monreal. The fact is though that we seemed incapable of stopping them.

Against Swansea, the warning signs had been there in the first half. Calum Chambers struggled badly to cope with the pace of Swansea winger, Jefferson Montero. It was obvious that the Ecuadorian had the beating of Chambers, and beat him he did, time and again until Swansea were eventually rewarded with the winner. Our goal was a classic example of how we should be playing away from home, with the pace and talent we have in attack.

It was a great counter attack which is what makes the proceeding capitulation all the more galling. How at 1-0, did we find ourselves in a situation where our left back was pursuing a Swansea midfielder through the centre of the park? Why was Gibbs in such an advanced position? Gibbs did the only thing he could in the situation, which was to give the free kick away. The result being Sigurdsson levelling the scores.

Credit where it’s due to, Garry Monk, because unlike Wenger he recognised that Chambers was struggling with Montero’s pace and substituted the tiring Bony with the six foot plus, Gomis, to target Monreal. Low and behold, Montero burnt Chambers one last time and Gomis’s first touch was header into the back of the net having “outjumped” Monreal. Chambers was roasted numerous times in the first half and inevitably picked up a yellow card in the second.

The obvious solution, would have been to bring on Bellerín as he has more pace and can’t have struggled any more than Chambers did against Montero. We could’ve then sent Chambers to centre half, as it’s unlikely that he would have struggled as badly in the air as Monreal did. Bellerín should have been on at halftime but Wenger doesn’t make substitutes before the sixty minute mark. Chambers was booked after 61 minutes and we scored after 62. Why wasn’t Bellerín brought on when we took the lead?

With the issue Chambers was having and given the fact that he had already been booked, one of two things was bound to happen. Either he would get a second yellow or Swansea would eventually be rewarded for Montero’s endeavours. In the end, it was the latter. Wenger probably thought that by leaving Chambers at full back he was showing faith in him but all that happened was, Chambers was left on to suffer which can’t have helped his confidence. In the end he was substituted for Yaya Sanogo, a player who has never scored in the Premier League, at a time when we were to chasing the game instead of closing it out.

I really like Calum Chambers and think he’s going to make a very good ball-playing centre back for club and country. However for a team that plays as high a line as us and with a midfield that offers the defence very limited protection, full-backs with pace are not optional, they’re a necessity.

Mutual Cluelessness

Paul Merson’s comment post Anderlecht, that Arsenal were clueless was blunt and general, but ultimately deserved. His assessment incurred a pretty barbed response from, Arsene Wenger, to the effect that, Merson, as a man who had never managed wasn’t qualified to make these comments.

Firstly, Merson, has managed albeit unsuccessfully and further down the leagues with Walsall. Secondly, Wenger’s fatuous pivot shows either a man backed into a corner or a man who feels he is above criticism from 99.9% of the people. Merson, may not always hit the nail on the head but he cares about the club and is only saying what is (A) blatantly obvious and (B) being said by a lot more people than just, Merson.

The Muddy Waters of Transfer Funds

At the AGM, Ivan Gazidis, attempted to dispel the idea that we have a considerable transfer fund sitting untouched. It’s possible that he’s downplaying the fund so that we’re not held over a barrel when it comes time to negotiate with other clubs. This is a very logical and reasonable approach.

It’s also possible that he’s protecting Wenger from criticism for not utilising the fund. Or it may well be true that there’s not as much money in the fund as has been calculated by others. Personally I think it’s the first one but let’s say for argument’s sake that the last is true. Why did we spend so much money on a luxury player when our squad had such rudimentary weaknesses?

I’m delighted that we have Sanchez. In my opinion he’s our best signing since Bergkamp, but at the beginning of the season every man and his dog could see where our squad was thin. Ultimately Wenger is responsible for signing players, and there are glaring issues with squad balance, so he has to wear any criticism for transfer failings

If the first scenario is the actual situation, then there’s no excuse for the state of our squad. We simply should have spent the required money to recruit another centre half and a defensive midfielder. We have missed an opportunity to really push on this season. Chelsea are starting to look uncatchable, but it didn’t need to be like that.

It’s unlikely that we would’ve had enough to finish above them even if we had signed the two players needed but we would have put up more of a challenge. It’s also less likely that we would currently be sat behind Southampton, Man City, West Ham and Swansea in the league and staring at another second place finish in our Champions League group.

A second or third place finish, in the league this season, would have represented progress for us but we look destined for our usual fourth place at best and as such it’s hard to argue that we’ve progressed. If scenario two is true and Gazidis is in fact trying to protect Wenger, then surely the time has come to hold him to account for the embarrassing situation that’s been allowed to develop with our squad’s imbalance.

Rory

flash drive

8GB Flashdrive on a keyring only £9.50 inc UK Delivery