Match Report: Arsenal 0 – 1 Everton

Arsenal (0) 0 Everton (0) 1

Premier League

Emirates Stadium, Drayton Park, London N5 1BU

Friday, 23rd April 2021. Kick-off time: 8.00pm

(4-2-3-1) Bernd Leno; Calum Chambers, Rob Holding, Pablo Marí, Granit Xhaka; Thomas Partey, Dani Ceballos; Nicolas Pépé, Emile Smith-Rowe, Bukayo Saka; Eddie Nketiah.

Substitutes: Hector Bellerin, Gabriel Magalhães, Martin Ødegaard, Willian Borges da Silva, Cédric Soares, Reiss Nelson, Mohamed Elneny, Mat Ryan, Gabriel Martinelli.

Yellow Cards: Thomas Partey

Arsenal Possession Percentage: 59%

Referee: Jonathan Moss

Assistant Referees: Marc Perry, Dan Robathan

Fourth Official: Graham Scott

VAR Team at Stockley Park: VAR David Coote; AVAR Stuart Burt

Attendance: A maximum of 300 attendees due to UK government coronavirus restrictions

For tonight’s St. George’s Day match here at the Emirates, we are without both of our first-choice forwards, Alexandre Lacazette and Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, due to injury and illness respectively; of course Kieran Tierney and David Luiz are also unavailable because of injury too, and Martin Ødegaard is in light training after an ankle problem and will be assessed by the coaching team just before kick-off. Let’s go!

We began the match quite energetically, applying pressure on the visitors’ goal, winning a corner within two minutes of the start, which although went nowhere, the intent was there. Everton’s best chance in the early part of the game came from a free-kick, which Gylfi Sigurdsson took, only for Rob Holding to easily neutralise the threat, by diverting the ball safely back to Bernd Leno. The two sides were looking fairly even, with their respective defenders skillfully cutting out any threat to score from either sets of strikers. Bukayo Saka was unlucky not to score when the ball flew into the Everton penalty area, but unfortunately Jordan Pickford made an easy save at close range from our young striker. At this moment in the game, the big players on both sides are lacklustre, it’s becoming fairly obvious that the match needs a goal to liven it up quickly, and Thomas Partey could just be the man to unlock the Toffees’ defence tonight. However, Bernd Leno made a fantatsic save from Richarlison at close range, and at the other end, a very quick smash’n’grab movement from us looked promising, but it petered out into nothing. Six minutes before the break, a twenty-yard Gylfi Sigurdsson free-kick bounced off the bar with Bernd Leno beaten, and just before half-time, Emile Smith-Rowe was unlucky not to gain control of the ball in the Everton penalty area; if the ball had not run away for him, we may well have gone into half-time in the lead, but it was honours even at the break.

No changes for the team line-up for the second half, and it started in the same manner as the first ended, with plenty of pressure on both goals but to no avail. Everton had the better chances of the two teams out there, with one or two shots going close by Bernd Leno’s goal. We were granted a penalty six minutes into the second half, but sadly it was cancelled out by VAR because Nicolas Pépé was deemed to be offside in the build-up, and a couple of minutes’ later, Everton’s penalty appeal was cancelled out by VAR also. And so it goes. Just before the hour mark, we nearly had a classic own-goal situation when Calum Chambers put in a low cross from the right flank, Mason Holgate took a massive swing at it, but it flew off the outside of his boot and into the side-netting. Nearly. After a free-kick on the left, when Nicolas Pépé was chopped to the ground by Mason Holgate (who was booked for his trouble), Rob Holding’s subsequent shot fired over the bar from close range; Dani Ceballos took a quick, strong shot from outside the box which was parried by Jordan Pickford for an Arsenal corner, which was cleared by the Everton defence. With about a quarter of an hour of the match remaining, in an effort to liven up proceedings, Nicolas Pépé and Eddie Nketiah were replaced by Martin Ødegaard and Gabriel Martinelli. A minute or so later, the visitors took the lead when Richarlison cut in from the right flank, crossed the ball, and somehow the ball bounced off the inside of Bernd Leno’s leg and into the net. Now we were chasing the game, and with decent chances very few and far between, it became a big problem for our chaps. Calum Chambers was replaced by Willian with eight minutes of the game remaining, and despite having fresh legs out there, it did not appear to make a whole lot of difference at all. With the game running down, we made a last gasp attack on the Everton goal, but we were unable to breeak down their defence adequately.enough to score the equalising goal. Twice in less than a minute, Jordan Pickford kept his side in the game, but the harder we tried, the more we got nowhere, and when referee Jonathan Moss blew the final whistle, it was a massive sense of disappointment on our behalf.

The most exciting thing about tonight was the thousand or so Arsenal supporters outside the ground protesting over the Super League debacle earlier in the week. This match was turgid, boring and pointless, and how can it be? With fifty-nine per cent posession, fourteen shots on goal (three on target), how did we end up with this result this evening? With Villareal on the horizon next Thursday, we had truly better pull our collective socks up. Or else.

Remember everyone, keep the faith, get behind the team and the manager, as this season is going to be crucial for our future success in all competitions. Stick with the winners. Our next match: Villareal at Estadio de la Cerámica on Thursday, 29th April at 8.00pm(Europa League). Victoria Concordia Crescit.

Steve

Too Dearly Loved To Be Forgotten: Arsenal v Racing Club de Paris 1930-1962 by Steve Ingless (Rangemore Publications, ISBN 978-1-5272-0135-4) is now available on Amazon.

How many Twitter followers does your club have?

8 years ago I decided to do a little analysis on how many Twitter followers every club has.

At the time, Arsenal led the way with 3,005,680.

Twitter was still something clubs were getting used too and not all clubs were taking it as seriously as others.

Manchester United for example had just 1,296,966 followers.

4 years on I revisited the analysis and the changes were interesting.

Manchester United were now the most followed club – with a 1264% increase. Arsenal were still the 2nd most followed.

With all the furore over the European Super League, a friend stuck the likes of the Greedy Six apology message into our WhatsApp Group with the tag line “they really are a small club”.

This was talking about Tottenham’s tweet getting just one third of the likes of Arsenal and Liverpool, less than half of Manchester City and ¼ of Manchester United.

It made me think about the analysis I did and luckily I was able to find the figures. They make interesting reading once more…

The first thing that jumps out is just how growth has stalled.

Manchester United’s growth from 2013 to 2017 was 1264%. Now it is just 53%.

This is due to two factors:

  • Twitter’s own growth over the last 4 years has been slow
  • Football’s global growth has stalled

The second thing that jumps out is how little Arsenal have grown in comparison to other “top 6” club – just 37% growth. This would be due to the way the club is so often portrayed negatively both on social media and in the press leading the club to gain less new followers in comparison.

Compare Arsenal to Tottenham in the last 7 years – Tottenham’s growth has been 125% (the most of the big 6). Arsenal have won trophies, Tottenham have not.

But if you look online you would think that Tottenham had been the successful team over the last 4 years. Perception is everything.

The third interesting point to note is the growth of Liverpool from 2017 to 2021.

At 83%, they have grown quicker than Manchester United, Chelsea, Arsenal and Manchester City. This shows how many people “jump on the bandwagon” when a team begins winning trophies.

Liverpool and Manchester City are the “newer” successful fans, so are gaining followers that they would not have gained during the 00s when both won very little.

In the 00s, these fans would have begun following Arsenal, Chelsea or Manchester United.

It really shows the importance of being a successful club, and winning the biggest trophies.

As for Tottenham, their growth has been huge but they were also coming from the lowest base point. Their percentage growth might the highest, but the volume of new followers is lowest; just 3.2million new followers in comparison to Arsenal who gained 4.7m.

The last point is how not being in the Premier League can impact your followers.

Leeds United returned to the Premier League for the first time in 16 years last summer.

When they were relegated back in 2004, you would have said they were in a group including Newcastle, Everton, Aston Villa and Tottenham. Sides who had a decent following but not much recent success.

They are now behind the likes of Crystal Palace and WBA. It is hard to grow a global fan base when you are not in the Premier League and not on the TV of people around the world every weekend.

Likewise you can see the benefit of Leicester City winning the league in 2016. They now have the 8th largest Twitter following and have continued to grow at quicker rates in comparison to the likes of West Ham and Wolves.

You can really see the impact on followings on the teams who have dropped out of the Premier League:

In 2017, the likes of Stoke City and Swansea were fairly stable Premier League clubs and had gained over 1million followers each.

Both were relegated in 2018 – a year after the previous study – and their growth since has been below 20%.

Likewise Cardiff City – who were in the Premier League in 2013 – have grown their following by just 5% since 2017. They have spent the majority of the time since 2013 in the Championship.

So in summary?

  • Growth is slowing
  • Being in the Premier League is important for all clubs to increase their following
  • Winning the Premier League / Champions League is the most important factor in growth
  • Negative perception sees to lower growth

Keenos

The ESL has collapsed but the CL still needs reform

One of the reasons why the European Super League reared its very ugly head once more was because the Champions League and Europa League are tournaments in decline.

Champions League viewing figures and crowds were dwindling before the Covid19 outbreak. The competition was in urgent need of reform.

It had become a predictable tournament. With the same group of teams constantly qualifying, the same making it through to the knock out stages and the same making the semi’s and finals.

Back in the 90s and 00s, European football was magic.

Part of that magic was that you would rarely play the same teams.

Arsenal’s first meeting with Bayern Munich in a competitive came was the 2000/01 Champions League. They would only be drawn together once more in the next 12 seasons – in 2005.

They would then be drawn against each other 4 times in the next 5 seasons from 2013 – 2017.

Before facing each other in the 2006 Champions League Final Arsenal and Barcelona had been drawn together once in Europe – 1999 when Arsenal played at Wembley.

From 2010 – 2016 Arsenal would be drawn together 3 times in 7 seasons.

And it is not just the big ties – Arsenal have been drawn against Olympiakos 6 times in 11 years.

The problem with European football is two fold.

Firstly over the last decade there has been less of a turnover of different teams making the tournament.

With England, Spain and Germany all getting 4 slots, Italy and France 3, we continually get the same teams qualifying.

Such is the weaknesses in depth in Spain, France, Italy and Germany; the likes of Real Madrid, Barcelona, Bayern Munich, PSG and Juventus will always be in the draw.

And then the draw itself is designed to keep teams apart, which as a result pushes other teams together.

UEFA created such a complex criteria that you will always end up with the same teams facing each other if the same teams continually qualify.

We have their coefficient seeding which is designed to keep the best teams apart to ensure their qualification. Then we can not have two teams from the same country in the same group.

On top of that you can not have more than two teams from the same country play on the same night (or two teams from the same country if only 2 qualify).

And the Last 16 knock out, similar rules apply.

Group winners are seeded against group runners up and teams from the same association can not face each other. It is only in the last 8 do we get a true random draw.

A European tie is no longer the magical experience it was.

The competition needs reform. UEFA knows it and the clubs know it. And that is what led to the split.

The clubs want a smaller competition, with guaranteed spots and more games against the “big clubs”. Whilst UEFA wanted to expand the competition. Make it bigger.

Both of their plans were awful, and this should not be forgotten about throughout all of this.

UEFA is not the “better of two evils”. They are equally as evil as the European Super League. And their plan is probably actually worse.

So how should UEFA reform European football? The most basic answer is probably the best:

Scrap the Europa League: Have one single tournament. The European Cup. All teams who meet the criteria of entry play in it.

Make it a knockout tournament: Make the competition a 128 team tournament. Have a pre-qualifying round or two if needed to get to that number like in the FA Cup. And then make it a two-legged knock out tournament all the way to the final. Teams would play 13 games to win the tournament. The same as the current format.

Make the draw random:  To increase unpredictability and to make the biggest games a rarer event, make the draw random. No seeding. So Manchester United face Barcelona in the 1st Round. One will be knocked out. So what? That means one was not good enough.

And allow same associations to face each other from Round One: Alongside the unseeded draw, allow clubs from the same association to face each other. None of this keeping them apart to maximise TV coverage.

If UEFA stripped back the tournament, simplified it and expanded it, it would resolve the problems.

As it stands UEFA’s aim is to ensure the “biggest” teams get the most games and progress. It is all about TV money. Not the excitement of the tournament.

Fans enjoyment has been secondary to them ensuring those big clubs get their pay out. And that is why their competitions are dying.

Keenos