The Dark Worlds of Barcelona & Real Madrid

1000x410_b-rm_v1397557021

For a long time, Barcelona and Real Madrid have been the world’s premier clubs. At the top of the tree. Winning everything, with style. The clubs no one wanted to face, but everyone wanted to join.

But what is rarely mentioned is the dark side of both clubs, and how they have both stretched laws and regulations to get to where they are. Some will say cheated. Other’s will say loopholes. Some is proven, other just speculation.

So what is the dark side of Barcelona and Real Madrid’s success?

Accusations of state funding / assistance

For a long time, there has been accusations that Real Madrid and Barcelona have had questionable help from the state. Whether it is the national Spanish government, or their local City or Catalonian officials.

Accusations have been thrown at Real Madrid about outside intervention since the 1940s where it has been reported that opposing players and officials were often threatened and intimidated by police to ensure they did not beat Madrid. During the same period, it is not too hard to find information reporting links between Real Madrid and Spanish Dictator General Franco.

At the same time, there are also plenty of reports that Barcelona received a lot of support from the Catalonian Government, who often saw Barcelona as much more than a football club, but a tool to use against the national government. Success for Barcelona over Real Madrid was seen as success for Catalonia over Spain.

Records of much money and ‘assistance’ these two sides actually received from the Franco / Catalonian regimes has probably long since disappeared.

Fast forward 60-odd years and not much has changed.

In 2013 Barcelona and Real Madrid, as well as Athletic Bilbao and Osasuna were investigated by the European Commission due to public funding issues creating giving them an unfair competitive advantage.

“Since 1990: Possible privileges regarding corporate taxation of Real Madrid CF, Barcelona CF, Athletic Club Bilbao, and Club Atletico Osasuna – These four clubs are exempted from the general obligation for professional football clubs to convert into sport limited companies. The effect of this exemption is that these clubs enjoy a preferential corporate tax rate of 25 per cent instead of 30 per cent applicable to sport limited companies.”

They basically got tax relief by not becoming sport limited companies, even though they have an obligation to do so. Fair? I think not.

On top of this, Real Madrid and the City of Madrid have also been investigated for a “very advantageous real property swap.”

In 2003, Real Madrid sold their training ground to the City of Madrid for €22.7 million. Just 5 years earlier in 1998, the land had been valued at €595,000. Even London land price rises, this is unbelievable.

At the time, Real Madrid were in crippling debt. They were coming to the end of their Galactico project and were struggling to pay their bills. Did the City of Madrid use public funds to bail out their crown jewel of a football club?

Most recently, it has come out that a Spanish bank has underwritten the debt owed by Real Madrid to Tottenham in the Gareth Bale deal. The controversy here is that the bank was recently bailed out by the EU. Have the EU inadvertently assisted in the funding of a football club transfer? Who knows, but there are calls for it to be ivnestigated.

Whether the speculation is true or not, there is no smoke without fire.

Tax Evasion

‘Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me three times, shame on both of us.’

Lionel Messi, Javier Mascherano, Neymar.

All 3 recently have been investigated for tax evasion.

Mascherano has been sentenced to jail for 1 year after admitting two counts of fraud totaling just over €1.5million. He will likely to a deal to stay out of jail but pay a hefty fine.

A plane and a yacht are amongst £32.5m assets frozen by the Brazilian authorities as they investigate a £10.5m tax fraud by the Brazilian between 2011 and 2013, including funds paid to Neymar and his father by Barcelona as part of his transfer.

The judge in the case accused the 23-year-old of “omitting sources of income from abroad”. Barcelona Football Club was cited as the source of unreported money.

And then we come to Lionel Messi. In a case that has been rumbling on for a while, Messi seems to have done everything possible to avoid liability in a €4.1 million tax fraud case, including trying to pass blame on to his father.

Most recently, the Barcelona public prosecutors involved in the case requested that Messi be cleared of all charges, quell surprise.

They announced that they would however be seeking an 18-month prison sentence for his father for allegedly defrauding Spain’s tax office. The judge in charge of the case rejected this request, and the Spanish State Legal Service called for Messi to be tried alongside his father on tax fraud charges.

This is a clear example of the Barcelona courts attempting to help Messi get off with fraud.

As investigations rumble on, it will not be a surprise if more Barcelona are embroiled in tax evasion cases. And if they are doing it in Barcelona, they are probably also doing it in Madrid.

Drug Doping

One of the more controversial darks sides of Real Madrid & Barcelona.

Eufemiano Fuentes is a Spanish doctor heavily implicated in the Operación Puerto doping case. Whilst the case mainly focused on the world of cycling, other sports were also implicated.

As of February last year, a Barcelona laboratory still holds 211 bags of blood and plasma which they are refusing to release to authorities. Madrid’s Provincial Court are set to announce (or may have already announced) the destruction of these bags. A Barcelona lab and a Real Madrid court involved in the cover up of bags of blood belonging to unnamed athletes???

It has been accused by some who were involved that they saw “well-known footballers” from La Liga visit the offices of Dr Fuentes. Now this could just be a normal visit. Fuentes was a doctor as well as a doping doctor.

But the rumours will not go away. In December 2010, an inmate claimed Fuentes had told him, “If I would talk, the Spanish football team would be stripped of the 2010 World Cup.” Fuentes has denied speaking to said inmate.

Fuentes himself has offered to identify the 211 bags of unnamed blood, but was told (or encouraged) by Judge Julia Santamaria that he was under no obligations to name any other athletes others than the cyclists implicated.

The issue is Spain has amongst the weakest anti-doping laws in Europe. Pretty much non-existent. To such an extent that Fuentes had to be charged under public health laws.

Cyclists got away with it for a long time, then we had the US Postal / Armstrong case. How long until we have the equivalent in football and a big side is found of guilty of running ‘the most successful doping programme sport has seen’.

Child Trafficking

Barcelona were recently banned for it. Real Madrid (And Atletico) are facing bans for it. Signing players from outside the EU under the age of 18.

La Masia is often put up as an example of how a football academy should run. Barcelona claim (and it formed part of their defence) that La Masia “forms people before athletes.” But it is also a centre of illegal activity.

Over the years, countless under 18s have been signed from abroad and gone through the academy. One was Lionel Messi who joined from Argentina at the age of 14 on ‘medical grounds’.

On the face of it, Barcelona & Madrid are just using their network of scouts and globalisation of football to sign the world’s best young talents. But in reality, it is child trafficking.

The NSPCC defines child trafficking as:

“Children are recruited, moved or transported over international borders to be exploited, forced to work or sold.“


 

Real Madrid and Barcelona sign children from foreign lands, to play them in games (work), even if they do not want to. They exploit these young children to ensure that they have the best young talent. It is clearly illegal, immoral and stronger sanctions than just transfer bans should be implemented.

 

So often they are held up as great clubs. But clearly Barcelona and Real Madrid are experts in the dark arts. Using every thing they can to be a success, no matter if it break the law.

It is an utter disgrace. And we have not even looked at how Bayern Munich have risen to the top yet.

Keenos

123

Cufflinks made by http://www.ukbadgepinsandcufflinks.com/

Do not blame Arsenal for the FA Cup draw

If Arsenal get through against Hull in the fifth round of the FA Cup, a quarter final tie against Watford is what awaits. And to every non-Arsenal fan’s fury and frustration, Arsenal were once more drawn at home.Untitled

Since Arsene Wenger became Arsenal manager, we have been drawn at home in the FA Cup 39 times. And drawn away 27. In a 50/50 chance, Arsenal have been drawn at home 59% of the time.

“But that does not add up, it must be a fix” I hear the less well educated (Spurs fans, Northerners) cry.

Well it does not add up because you do not know statistics.

Yes, it is a 50/50 chance of being at home, but that does not mean that when the data is crunched, you should see an exact 50% split. Especially when the data pool is as small as 66.

Do not believe me? Flip a coin. 66 times. Write down how many heads, how many tails. I did it. Untitled37 heads, 29 tails. Or 56% heads. You see, what you must remember is that each time you flip the coin, or a ball is drawn, the previous times have no barring. Each individual event has a 50/50 chance of happening each time. In other words, just because you flipped heads last time, does not mean you will flip tails this time.

Now of course, the larger the data pool, the closer to 50% you will get with a 50/50 chance. So if I flipped my coin 1,000,000 times, it will be closer to 50% than when I flipped it just 66 times. Because what it does not account for his runs, streaks. For example, I got 9 heads in a row when doing this task.

At some point, the statistics say that I will probably get 9 tails in a row and it will even itself out. That is true. But over time it will even out, not over just 66.

I bet if we increased our data pool, and rather than looked at how often Arsenal have been drawn at home since Arsene Wenger took over, we went for the entire history of Arsenal, the statistics would be closer to 50%. Arsenal are just on a streak of home games, just like I had a streak of heads.

It is just the luck of the draw.

“Arsenal always get easy draws” I hear the bitters cry out as a secondary argument.

Well this once again is not Arsenal’s fault.

In 2013/14, is it Arsenal’s fault that Manchester United could not beat Swansea at home in the 3rd round? Or in the fifth round that Manchester City knocked out Chelsea, before getting knocked out by Wigan Athletic? And do we just forget that Arsenal knocked out Spurs, Liverpool and Everton that season?

Fast forward to 2014/15. Chelsea lost at home in the 4th round to Bradford. Is it Arsenal’s fault that they were unable to face Chelsea due to them being unable to win at home against a League 2 side? No.

Is it Arsenal’s fault that Spurs could not get past a then-bottom-of-the-table Leicester City at home? Or that Manchester City lost to Championship side Middlesbrough? Arsenal can not help it if our opponents keep losing before we play them. Coincidently, had Manchester City had won, we would have played them in the 5th round, where we instead knocked out Middlesbrough.

In the 6th round of the 2014/15 season, Arsenal played away to Manchester United, and won. So that is Manchester United, Liverpool, Everton & Spurs beaten in 2 seasons. Not our fault Chelsea and Man City lost before we could play them.

And then the semi-finals. Liverpool lost to Aston Villa at Wembley, before Aston Villa were thrashed by Arsenal in the final. I am sure it would have been great for Steven Gerrard’s last game in England to be in an FA Cup final, but it is not Arsenal’s fault Liverpool did not make it, but Gerrard and his team mates.

Even this season, Spurs lost at home to Crystal Palace – the 2nd time in two years that they have been knocked out at home,

So opposing fans, you can moan all you like, but it is not Arsenal’s fault you keep getting knocked out before you get to play the mighty Arsenal. Maybe if your sides were better, you might actually get the chance of playing us in a semi final or final?

And has anyone actually looked to see who other teams play on route to winning the FA Cup?

Well the last time Spurs won it in 1991, they obviously beat Arsenal. But their route to the semi final? A 4th tier side (Blackpool) and 2nd tier sides (Oxford United, Portsmouth & Notts County). Arsenal were the first top tier team they played that year.

How about Manchester United in 1998/99? Their treble year? It is never mentioned that they were drawn at home in every round of the FA Cup. All that is mentioned is that they won it.

And that is what is key. Who wins it. No one remembers who you played on the way. No one really cares.Portsmouth played one Premier League side when they won the FA Cup in 2008. Wigan Athletic just the 2. But who cares? No one.

It does just make me laugh when the draws happen. Because at the end of the day, it is a 50/50 chance of you being drawn home or away, and it does not matter who you play as long as you win. History will remember the winners. Not who they beat.

The only certainty that there is in the FA Cup is that over the last 25 years, Spurs have not won it. And it is for that reason that they are so bitter.

Bring on Hull, bring on Watford, and let’s go to Wembley again!

Keenos

123

Arsenal v Swansea set to be re-arranged for FA Cup replay

The weekends draw against Hull City is bad news for fans of Swansea City, as it is likely that their Premier League game against Arsenal will be re-arranged to allow the FA Cup replay to take place.

Looking at the fixtures list, and taking into account the implications of the Champions League, it is the only mid-week that is available between now the the FA Cup Quarter Final –Untitled

As you can see, there is not much time between now and the FA Cup Quarter Final.

Now some of you will be screaming “Arsenal do not play in the Champions League the weekend before the QF” Well you are right, but also wrong.

UEFA’s dictatorship dictates that national federations may not schedule top level games or cup matches that clash with Champions League or Europa League.

Basically, they do not want an FA Cup, La Liga or Serie A game to take away any of the viewers from their tournament. It is basically greed. They do not want their own TV viewing figures to drop, and therefore reducing the people that see their sponsors adverts. They basically bully national federations with “If you want to play in our competitions, you have to agree to our rules.”

They do the same with governments if they wish to host major tournaments – the IAAF also do it with the Olympics – ensuring little to no tax is paid by either the organisation or their sponsors.

What this leaves the FA, Arsenal & Hull with is three options:

  1. Re-arrange the Arsenal v Swansea and Birmingham v Hull City games, putting the FA Cup replay on either the 3rd or 4th of March. The re-arranged Swansea fixture will then be moved to the week commencing 18th March
  2. Play the FA Cup reply on the same weekend as the QF games. And then re-schedule the QF match for when the QF replays will be (and pray that the QF does not go to replay)
  3. Schedule the game for when the Champions League is, but have it finishing before 7.45pm so that is does not clash with Champions League games – Barcelona recently played a match against Sporting Gijon in La Liga kicking off late afternoon

The Swansea fixture is the most likely, and easiest for all involved, to move.

Looking forward into the future (if Arsenal get through), the Premier League and Arsenal could have some headaches coming up. If Arsenal make the QF of the FA Cup, and are taken once more to a replay, and get through to the semi final, we might see Arsenal having to play a fixture after the season has “ended.”

Untitled

If Arsenal make the Semi Final, requiring a replay in the QF, it leaves one free week to play 3 fixtures.

Even if we do not require a QF replay, it still leaves one game having no where to go, as the QF replay week will be used for Swansea, and it would still leave us to have to re-arrange the Swansea and Sunderland game into the same week to ensure all games are completed before the end of the season.

Of course, this is all just speculation at the moment, if Arsenal lose to Hull, the re-arranged Swansea game will take place where the FA Cup QF game is and there will be no need to reschedule any further games.

It could be even worse for Manchester City if today’s game against Chelsea go’s to replay. With next week being the League Cup Final, they already have one game to re-arrange. They could end up having 4 to find space for.

As a travelling fan, it is frustrating to not be able to take advantage of advanced rail tickets. I feel for Swansea fans who will be unable to get refunds. I feel for WBA fans who still await a date to play Arsenal. And I feel for ourselves, who are going to have to potentially wait until the last minute to purchase what will then be a £100 rail ticket to get to Sunderland (via Newcastle).

Sorry Swansea.

Keenos

123