Tag Archives: She Wore

Southgate exclusion of Arsenal youngster “utterly baffling”

The exclusion of Bukayo Saka from Gareth Southgate’s latest England squad has not garnered sufficient attention, owing to the fiasco surrounding Harry Maguire and his exploits in Mykonos.

Having been found guilty of repeated bodily harm, Maguire was subsequently withdrawn only four hours after the original squad announcement.

In an utterly baffling decision, one name is a glaring absence from the 23-man squad: that of Bukayo Saka.

Saka enjoyed a breakout season in 2019/20 for the Gunners in what proved a turbulent and tumultuous campaign for the club. Finishing with 12 assists across all competitions, the 

18-year-old firmly established himself as one of the Premier League’s future stars. 

His rise to prominence was deservedly rewarded with a new four-year contract in July, as well as change of shirt number from 77 to 7, one that Arsenal traditionally reserved for academy graduates who excelled in the first team. What made Saka’s performances all the more impressive were that they came from all over the pitch. Under Mikel Arteta, Saka has played at left-back, left and right winger and even appeared in central midfield. 

This brings us to Southgate’s squad selection and his curious decision to select no recognised left-back. If the Three Lions boss wanted someone who is familiar in that role, he would have called up Luke Shaw or Ben Chilwell. Their absences are a sign that Southgate is willing to experiment with his formation and personnel for the upcoming UEFA Nations League games against Iceland and Denmark. 

Why then, was a player as versatile as Saka, left out of the picture?

Arsenal’s Hale End graduate has played as a full-back in both three and four-man systems at club level, possessing the required footballing IQ to interchange positions with a knowledge that belies his youth. His understanding of how his role in the England side would alter depending on Southgate’s preferred formation makes Saka the ideal starter on the left-hand side of defence.

When asked about Saka’s absence, Southgate replied that he “was watching him very closely”. This is undoubtedly true but perhaps the best way to judge a young player’s suitability for international football is to throw him into the firing line and see if he is able to perform under pressure. 

Southgate, who is an exceptional judge of a player’s character, would have been able to gauge the Arsenal youngster’s readiness to make the step up far more accurately by spending time with the player in person than through the feedback of assistants and contacts elsewhere. Saka would have also benefitted individually from the opportunity to experience the senior setup. He is yet to be officially capped by England after featuring for their age-group teams from U16 up to U19 level. 

Southgate and his staff may not have wanted to rush Saka into the England team after such an eventful season for the Arsenal starlet. However, the inclusion of other players who excelled at club level last season such as Mason Greenwood, Kalvin Phillips and Phil Foden makes the exclusion of Saka a perplexing one.

Zac Campbell

Arsenal star should stay and fight for his place

The aftermath of the FA Cup was an emotional time for Emiliano Martinez. Having waited patiently for ten years to become Arsenal’s starting goalkeeper, Martinez was overcome with emotion as he sat on the Wembley sideline, FA Cup winners’ medal around his neck, video calling his family in Argentina.

Following six different loans over seven years, the Argentine excelled in goal towards the end of last season after being called up to replace the injured Bernd Leno. His assured performances have put him firmly in contention to be the Gunners’ number one for the 2020/21 campaign, even if Martinez has since revealed interest from “ten teams in Europe”.

Rewind to 20 June and that horrific loss away to Brighton. It was an ugly day that went badly wrong for Mikel Arteta and Arsenal. One that could be summed up by the ghastly injury suffered by Bernd Leno as he clashed awkwardly with Neal Maupay. The initial news did not look good, with Leno initially feared to be out for six months with a damaged ACL. The one player Arteta needed to back up a shaky defence was lost for the season.

Step forward, Emiliano Martinez. Many fans had forgotten his name, but he was determined to make sure they remembered it. Having outlasted Wojiech Szczesny, Petr Cech and David Ospina, to name a few, the 27-year-old was focused on making the number one spot his own.

What followed was completely unexpected. Martinez didn’t just do what was required of him as a stand-in replacement, he excelled to such a degree that he was arguably the best goalkeeper in the post-lockdown Premier League. Stunning saves against Southampton, Norwich City and his last-minute heroics to secure a win at home to Liverpool have underlined have cemented his status as Arsenal’s second quality keeping option.

After waiting a decade to prove himself in north London, Martinez has done just that in a matter of months. As a result, it is completely understandable that he may wish to capitalise on the best form of his career with a big-money move elsewhere.

However, if Arteta and his coaching staff are shrewd in their handling of Martinez’s demands for first-team football, there is no reason why he and Leno can’t both be at the club.

Leno should remain the clear starter because, despite his injury, he has been one of the most reliable goalkeepers in the league throughout his first two seasons in England. Having cemented the number one spot, it would be harsh on Leno to take it away from him due to an injury that was out of his control.

Even with Leno as number one, Martinez will get plenty of game time too. As deputy, the Argentine will feature in all of Arsenal’s cup matches over three competitions: the FA Cup, Carabao Cup and Europa League. If Martinez wants to play a higher percentage of games that include Premier League fixtures, Arteta could select him for matches of lesser importance against sides in the bottom half of the table. This approach would have the added benefit of protecting Leno from another injury amidst what is going to a packed schedule for 2020/21, whilst of course keeping Martinez satisfied.

Martinez may even be given the starting shirt for the new campaign, with the view of easing Bernd Leno back into action gradually. Although Leno trained at the end of last season, it is not yet clear as to whether he will immediately be match-fit and ready to go.

Any public offers for Martinez from those “ten teams” are yet to be received by Arsenal, so it is entirely feasible that he will stay at the club. If this is the case, then Arteta must approach a delicate situation with innovative methods to ensure that he can keep Leno and Martinez, both worthy of the number one spot, content over the forthcoming campaign.

Zac Campbell

£20million for Ainsley Maitland-Niles is a “good price”

https://twitter.com/KeenosAFC/status/1298211307590754305

It is 2020, not 2019

There is not a lot of money flying about football this summer.

Unlike 2019 when 6 clubs spent over £100million – including Aston Villa and Everton, and the likes of Leicester City spent over £90million and West Ham just shy of £80million, this summer will see spending dramatically reduced for all clubs bar Chelsea and Manchester City.

With COVID19 restrictions meaning crowds are unlikely, income at all clubs is going to be down. This means every side has less to spend.

So £20million in 2020 is more like £25-30million in 2019.

We are all going to have to get used to slightly lower transfer fees.

Of course, it also works for us. Getting Gabriel for £25million feels cheap.

No potential

Maitland-Niles is now 23-years-old. He is moving out of the “potential” bracket and into “established”.

This impacts Maitland-Niles fee as clubs will no longer spend money on what Maitland-Niles might become, but what he actually is.

So what is Maitland-Niles?

He is a 23-year-old versatile player with 100 games for Arsenal.

Over the last 3 years when he has been a regular in the Arsenal first team squad, he has not regularly started.

The majority of his games have been at right back, where he has been exposed a little bit defensively. Whilst at right wing back in a back 3 he has excelled.

He wants to play central midfield, but has very little top flight experience in that position.

So a club will be taking a risk with Maitland-Niles if they plan to put him central midfield. Likewise most clubs will not buy him to play right back.

It is interesting to see that it is Wolves he is seemingly heading for.

A team that often play 3 at the back and have just lost their Jonny for about 8 months.

Jonny covers both left wing back and right wing back for Wolves, so you can see why they are targeting Maitland-Niles.

£20million for a wing back is a decent chunk of cash.

Maitland-Niles is certainly no Declan Rice (midfielder) or Ben Chillwell (establish Premier League left back).

Arsenal do not need him

Often the price of a player is driven by how much a team still needs him.

Take Ben Chillwell. He is still very much in Leicester’s plans, so Chelsea have to pay a premium for him.

The reality is Maitland-Niles is 3rd choice right back, 2rd choice left back, and about 6th or 7th choice in midfield. He is very much surplus to requirements.

Getting the cash in is more important than holding out as long as possible for the highest fee.

Leicester would not be too upset if Chelsea failed to meet their valuation and Chillwell spent another 12 months in the Midlands.

Arsenal probably would be annoyed if they ended up keeping Maitland-Niles over £5million.

Sell to invest

As discussed, Maitland-Niles is surplus to requirements. Every Premier League club also needs to sell to buy.

These 2 factors drive down the price slightly.

It is like part-exchanging your car.

You might value your car at £5,000, but if £4,500 still allows you to buy your new car, you will take the lower price enabling yourself to drive away with your new motor the same day.

£20million for Arsenal might be just what is needed to sign Thomas Partey or Houssem Aouar.

A quick sale enables Arsenal to increase their offers for targets elsewhere. Targets that improve the first team.

Alex Iwobi

A few people have mentioned that Alex Iwobi went for £35million last summer.

The Iwobi deal sums everything up:

  • Iwobi was more established than Maitland-Niles
  • Iwobi signed for Everton in 2019 when players value was higher than now
  • Arsenal did not particularly need to sell Iwobi
  • The move happened on deadline day
  • Everton were desperate for a winger
  • Everton had a big chunk of cash to spend

Throw these factors in a pot and you end up with Iwobi costing Everton £35million.

They were desperate to buy, Arsenal not desperate to sell.

Fast forward 12 months, I do not see any side desperate to sign Maitland-Niles out there. Not many teams looking to add an inexperienced central midfielder who has mainly played at full back.

There are more establish options available if you are after a central midfielder (Lewis Cook), and better options available if you are after a left back or right back (Nicolás Tagliafico). Being a wing back, you become quite a niche signing.

 

£20million feels like a good deal for both clubs.

Arsenal sell a fringe player who would get very little game time next year, adding cash to the purchase pot for a first team player. Wolves get their wing back to cover their first choice who is out injured.

My gut feeling is that those who are saying it is too cheap are judging him by 2018/19 prices, not 2019/20.

£20million for Ainsley Maitland-Niles is a good price.

Keenos