Media Bias Against Arsenal

Ed note: This piece first appeared on – it has been published with kind permission of the team at You Are My Arsenal and KeenosAFC.

What a difference 24 hours makes? On Wednesday, the English press’s response to Arsenal being knocked out of the Champions League, and Mesut Ozil going off at half time with a hamstring injury was a negative one…

“Same old story as Arsenal crash out of Champions League”

“Lost and lazy Ozil…he’s nicking a living”

A day later, Manchester City got knocked out of the Champions League, Sergio Aguero went off at half time with a hamstring injury, and the press completely turned their negative Arsenal stories into positive Manchester City ones…

“Brave City Bow Out”

“Hamstring Dramas for Aguero”

The differing response to both games is an interesting one.

Arsenal drew away from home to the current European Champion’s, who currently sit 20 points clear of the Bundesliga. Manchester City lost 2-1 away from home to a side who themselves lost 7-0 on aggregate to last years European Champions, who currently sit 3rd in their domestic league.

Both sides are out, both had their red card controversies, and both sides were comprehensively passed off the pitch. So why the differing opinions by the British press?

The Guardian opens with “The Champions League is a tough, unforgiving competition” to make it clear that Man City going out was not a disaster, but “a reminder about the brutalities of football at the highest level.” Twice knocked out of the group stages, this year Manchester City did not make it past the first knock out stage. Why did the press decide to describe them as brave, whilst saying Arsenal’s was ‘Same old story’?

The Aguero/Ozil situation also highlights a clear bias in the presses thinking. Both got injured very early on in the 1st half and were taking off after half time. Aguero has been commended for battling through the 1st half and trying to do his best for the time. Whilst Ozil has been described as not only lost and lazy, but much worse. Ex Arsenal player turned pundit, John Hartson, even went as far as questioning the injury by saying Ozil needs to “re-asses whether he actually wants to play for Arsenal.”

A lot was made of Mesut Ozil’s first half contribution in the press. “21 touches of the ball” was the sole statistic used to highlight how poor he was. Meanwhile, Brave, strong Sergio Aguero had 6 touches of the ball, none of which were in the opponents box, attempted 3 passes, completing just 1, and that was at kick off. If any player should have been described as ‘Lost and Lazy’ it was Sergio Aguero.

So why the differing view?

For a long time, the press have been anti-Arsenal. Yes, every club will claim the press, or certain journalists, are anti-their club. But in Arsenal’s case, they have a point. From TalkSport’s ‘Daily Arsenal’, to Match of the Day’s continually mocking of Arsene Wenger, the written press are probably the worst for being biased against Arsenal.

In the late 90′s/early 00′s, Arsenal had a poor disciplinary record. Recently, Arsenal got their 100th red card. A lot was made of it. But little was made of Arsenal continually topping the fair play league over the last 10 years.

After the poor discipline, the next stick the press used to bash Arsenal as that of being ‘softies’. This highlights the rank hypocrisy of the British press. One moment they are having a go at Arsenal for being too rough, the next they are moaning about being too soft.

The foreign agenda that the press had also got up my noise. Whilst Arsenal were going unbeaten, with a perfect disciplinary record, the press continually highlighted our lack of English players. The agenda peaked during our Champions League run of 2006 when Alan Pardew proclaimed in his newspaper column that Arsenal were not an English side. No mention was made of other top clubs (Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester United, Tottenham) not producing an England regular since the 90s, nor is it ever mentioned that it was Liverpool who played once played an FA Cup Final without a single Englishman in the line up – 1985/86.

A final example is the Arsenal trophy drought. Is any other clubs ‘lack of trophies’ mentioned as much as Arsenal? I can be watching Blackpool v Blackburn, and they will mention it. In every written article about Arsenal, it is mentioned. Yet what of Everton’s trophy drought? What of Aston Villa’s? Why do they not talk about the last time Tottenham or Liverpool won the league? It is getting quiet clear that there is an anti-Arsenal agenda in the press. But Why?

The traditional English press was based in Fleet Street. Fans of West Ham and Tottenham made up their majority. The only thing they could agree on was bashing Arsenal. It is often why still, even now, West Ham and Spurs get an easy ride on the press. Moving on to the spoken press, there is a massive North-West bias. The majority of BBC, ITV, Sky and BT Sport pundits come have associations with either Manchester United or Liverpool. The 3rd most represented club is Tottenham. It creates a situation were negativity about other clubs is suppressed, whilst the likes of MOTD, with their ex-Liverpool and Tottenham line up bash Arsenal. Alan Hansen has never quite got over 1989. Why are there so many Scousers working as pundits these days?

And of course, the press also do not want to upset Liverpool or Manchester united, as both have previously restricted access or refused to buy publications of those who do.

Taking biased journalism aside, there is another reason so much is written about Arsenal.

Arsenal fans, over and above any other club, are media hungry. A phone-in about Arsenal on a radio station gets the most call ins. A back page about Arsenal gets the most readers. A headline on a website about Arsenal gets the most hits. we have more blogs then any other club. We have more podcasts then any other club. Chances are you were linked to this blog through a news aggregators – Arsenal has the most, or twitter – Arsenal have the most followers, or Facebook – Arsenal have the most likes. The fact is, you, we, are part of the problem. If we did not read, listen, watch as much, less would be written. Is it our higher level of education that causes this (Spurs fans can’t read so do not buy papers)? Or is it that due to the bashing, we fight back, through phone-ins, through blogs.

The media is biased against Arsenal. This bias reared its ugly head once more in the response to Arsenal and Manchester City going out of the Champions League. If you do not believe there is a bias, buy a paper, go online, read the articles, and judge for yourself.



15 thoughts on “Media Bias Against Arsenal

  1. Barry Carroll

    That is spot on… If Arsenal had gone out of the FA cup and Champions league in the space of a few days like city did then the press would have had a field day.. Yet they attack Arsenal for going out to the european champs… Its a disgrace they have even refused to attack Manchester United and spurs (£100mil waste of money) with the seasons they are having… Even if we win the FA cup they wont give us credit… We must stick together and forget about them.. The good days will return… #COYG


  2. will

    The gutter press and sky/m u hate arsenal the BBC and ITV are no friends makes you wonder why ? The most moved from m u now they are down drain to m c the billions of pounds team that played without a single British player 2 games ago arsenal fans should fight back


  3. mark

    its always the same, if you listen to the commontators from the arsenal match compared to the city game, city are hero’s while arsenal are slagged off most of the way through their match, its not just one match, it happens alot. we did ok compared to city, we did’nt have a full squad as they did,also we were playing last seasons champions. also if you watched the f.a cup last week city were simpathised with for losing to wigan. newspapers are the same, we lose, we are same old arsenal, cant win anything,while man u are still praised even though they wont win anything this season. COME ON ARSENAL, DO DOUBLE, SHUT THOSE CRITICS UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!


  4. Rob

    Top quality journalism based on fact as usual. Arsenal fans rejoice, you are in a different class! actually this is a broader issue about the state of British society where dignity and respect for values must be attacked by the chav brigade. Nothing upsets these people more than seeing the way our great club is run, we are a beacon of light in an otherwise dark, dingy and immoral football wasteland. COYG


  5. David

    Quite simply one of the best Arsenal-fan articles I have read all season long! But the media bias against us should be seen as a positive: it highlights what a huge club we are. If we do win the cup this year, the media reaction will be along the lines of ‘it’s ONLY a domestic cup’ and/or ‘who were you up against in the semis and final’.


  6. Ray

    Look back at the Old Trafford brawl and the Daily Mirror (Harry the yid Harris) and their witch hunt which resulted in Arsenal getting points docked. There has been many incidents since where other teams have done exactly the same thing and HEY PRESTO…..NOTHING!!….Eduaro dives against Celtic and it’s open season on Arsenal….Shrek and Ashley Young do it and noting happens


  7. Ejakait

    Its better to be underrated than to be praised,this will make u work hard.Its time to stick together as Arsenal followers and forget about the media,they do not play.My worry is,if that biased media do block any player signing for Arsenal,if they don’t have power over that,then to hell you BIASED MEDIA.


  8. omomoh blessing

    A very impresive write up. Arsenal is a team that other teams have great envy for. I am so happy that unlike spurs and the likes of man city who spent so much with little achievements so far attract much pity from the media. It simply shows a clear bias, but the plus and minus of it all is that our great team keeps pushing even in the midst of all the bias and public attacks. It goes a long way to show character in a coach and a team set to achieve greatness. Ride on Arsenal.


  9. Pingback: Spurs, Chelsea, Olivier Giroud, Liverpool & Matthias Ginter | She Wore A Yellow Ribbon

  10. couples counseling bay area

    With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into
    any issues of plagorism or copyright violation? My blog has a lot of completely unique content I’ve either written myself or outsourced
    but it seems a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my authorization.
    Do you know any methods to help reduce content from being stolen? I’d definitely
    appreciate it.


  11. john saunders

    I am a Fulham fan and heartily agree that Arsenal are disliked by the media as are Chelsea and Fulham. The London media are so up the behinds of Spurs and West Ham it is laughable! Both Man Utd and Liverpool are over praised too , but not to the extent of Spurs and West Ham. The media is a joke!


  12. Jayjay

    Spot on. Jealousy. A W has a heart. Other Managers just jumping on bandwagon of best team that year.
    Liver….never won prem. Totts not won prem f nearly 60yrs. They both commended.
    Every other team allowed to ENJOY their season (win, lose, or draw), but Arsenal HAVE win title .EVERY YEAR WITHOUT FAIL. AFTERALL IT’S 12YRS RITE and we can’t be having that.
    Man utd won FA last yr. Well done
    Arsenal win FA cup 3 times (yes 3 times ) in 4 yrs Still not good enuff.
    Totts haven’t won it at all. But that’s OK. It’s Totts rite.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.