Category Archives: Arsenal

Juventus crisis opens door for Arsenal to return for two former targets

Morning all.

The big football news concerns what happened in Italy last night.

The entire Juventus board resigned last night following a charge of false accounting. Last season saw a year of record-breaking losses published by the Turin club – £220million.

Reports in Italy are that the accounting scandal could be as big as the 2006 match fixing scandal, which saw Juventus relegated.

A Turin prosecutor had alleged that the club misrepresented financial losses in the period 2018-20, with prosecutors investigating the amount ascribed to player sales.

Up to 15 individuals, including club president Andrea Agnelli, are reported listed as suspects following an investigation and could face a legal trial.

Football is a vulture sport. Clubs are quick to take advantage of another’s demise and lick the bones clean.

In 2006, a lot of Juve players stayed despite their relegation – Gianluigi Buffon, Alessandro Del Perio, David Trezeguet, Pavel Nedved and more. But these were club legends who clearly get they owed the side something. I do not think that can be said about many of the current squad.

Two names stand out as potential Arsenal targets – former targets Manuel Locatelli and Dusan Vlahovic.

Could Arsenal return for the pair? Or having been turned down by them, should we move on to other targets?

Manuel Locatelli

I have been a huge fan of Locatelli for years.

A couple of years ago I did a bit of scouting work to try and establish a Granit Xhaka replacement (this was for myself, not paid work for Arsenal!). Locatelli came out as the number one target.

He had the passing, defensive work rate and youth to be a long term Xhaka replacement. He ended up joining Juventus on a 2-year loan deal, with the Italian side obliged to pay €25million at the end of this season.

With what is going on, they may not have the funds to make the deal permanent. That would put him back into the open market.

Two years ago, when I was doing my research, it was Xhaka I was looking to replace. A lot has changed since then.

Xhaka has been pushed further forward, and Thomas Partey plays as the single pivot defensive midfielder. I am not sure Locatelli is suited to either of these position.

For Juventus, he tends to play as part of a solid midfield 3 alongside Adrien Rabiot and Weston McKennie.

It is a solid, hard working midfield 3 reminiscent of Fabinho, Jordan Henderson and Gini Winjaldum. Juventus also play with a back 3.

A question needs to be asked whether Locatelli can transition from being part of a 3 man defensive wall in front of the defence, to a one person army.

He is more of a Xabi Alonso, an Andrea Pirlo, than a Sergio Busquets or Gennaro Gattuso. I am not sure he is the man to compete with Partey.

And if we are considering playing him further forward, I think there are more suitable options.

Locatelli does not really get involved in the final 3rd for Juventus, although this could be by design and through instruction at Juventus. He was more creative for Sassuolo.

I just think if we are looking for a Xhaka back-up/replacement, there are more natural 8s coming on the market – I’m thinking of Youri Tielemans.

If we need a new 8, the case for Tielemans is stronger than Locatelli.

The Belgium is around the same age, but is Premier League proven in that position.

My bet is Locatelli will end up at either Manchester United or Liverpool.

I can see him doing a job in a midfield two alongside Casemiro. Likewise Jurgen Klopp loves a midfield 3 like Juventus.

We will probably miss out on Locatelli again, but this time it will be our choice.

Dusan Vlahovic

We were in for Vlahovic last January, and he ended up joining Juventus.

Reports came out of Turin early on that he was unhappy, that Juve’s style of play did not suit him.

Plenty has been written about his “struggles” and Aleksandar Mitrović has been selected ahead of him in both of Serbia’s games so far at the World Cup

The selection is not a huge surprise – Mitrovic has been first choice for 9 years and their top goal scorer with 51 in 78 games. Vlahovic only made his debut in 2020.

To Serbia, Mitrovic is their Harry Kane. A consistent performer for country even when not so consistent for club. He is undroppable for them.

But Vlahovic he still has 16 goals in 36 games for Juventus and 9 in 18 for Serbia.

After the Vlahovic deal fell through last winter, Arsenal kept the powder dry and recruited Gabriel Jesus in the summer. Despite his goal drought, he has been a huge success.

Anyone that watches Jesus regularly will know he is much more than just a goal scorer.

His movement, creativity, pressing and defending from the front has created as many as he has scored. Only Manchester City have scored more goals than us this season, and the way our front 3 are spreading the load gives us a triple threat up top.

Vlahovic is more of a central striker. What we would lose in the combination play between Gabriel Martinelli, Bukayo Saka and Jesus we would gain in Vlahovic’s clinical finishing.

I also have a theory that Jesus would still have been a target even if signed Vlahovic last winter.

Over the summer, after the Brazilians recruitment, we continued to chase Raphinha. This showed that Mikel Arteta wanted a trio of wide forwards.

Had Vlahovic have joined, would Jesus have been this wide forward option? He would have competed alongside Martinelli and Saka to play either side of the big man, whilst also been the first choice to come in for Vlahovic to rest and rotate.

Arsenal are heavily linked with Mykhailo Mudryk, showing Arteta still wants a wideman.

Could a solution be buying Vlahovic, and then utilising Jesus outwide?

This would solve 2 issues at the club – no top class back up for Jesus, no top class back up for Martinelli / Saka. Jesus would become that.

But that is the role that made Jesus so unhappy at Manchester City.

He was fed up of playing 2nd fiddle to Sergio Aguero, Raheem Sterling and Riyad Mahrez. And in his final season – with no Aguero – he still played more outwide than up top.

Whilst he has flourished up front, Jesus has previosuly spoken about playingoutwide:

Speaking to City magazine, Jesus said: “I feel comfortable out wide and can help my teammates and my team. I can make runs in behind, control the ball, make passes, make crosses, help in defending. As I say, I feel comfortable there.

“I didn’t start to play as a winger just this season. I have played with the national team there for two years. I started to play in the first team of Palmeiras as a winger as well and I played sometimes when I arrived here as a winger as well. So I think I’m okay there.

“I can make runs in behind, control the ball, make passes, make crosses, help defend so it’s all good and suits my game.”

So maybe, even though we want Jesus to play upfront, he feels more comfortable outwide.

There is still the “job sharing” aspect we need to consider. But it is a bit different at Arsenal.

For City, he was rotated with Sterling, Mahrez, Phil Foden, Jack Grealish and Bernardo Silva on the wingers. 6 players for two positions.

At Arsenal it would be himself, Saka, Martinelli and Emile Smith Rowe. And Smith Rowe is a long way behind the others. He would basically only be competing with Saka and Martinelli. 3 into 2 at Arsenal against 6 into 2 at City. And he would still be that 2nd choice option up top.

Whereas I do not think Locatelli is required right now, a move for Vlahovic could be on the table.

Signing Vlahovic, and utilising Jesus outwide, would put an end to our pursuit of Mykhailo Mudryk.

Keenos

Jose Antonio Reyes-esque signing would “jump start Arsenal’s title challenge”

January 2004.

Arsenal were unbeaten in the league after 22 games played.

Despite the 23 game unbeaten run (including the final 2 games of the 2002/03 season), Arsenal were not running away with the league.

We were just 2 points ahead of Manchester United, having only regained top position the week before.

It would have been very easy for the club to “stick” with the current squad rather than “twist” and bring someone in.

The club decided to spend £10.5million (rising to £17m) on 20-year-old Spanish starlet Jose Antonio Reyes.

As we all know, Arsenal would go on to famously win the Premier League unbeaten, and finished 15 points ahead of Manchester United.

Whilst Reyes scored just 2 Premier League goals (and an own goal!) in the second half of the season, he had a huge influence on the title charge.

He was an exciting, fresh, young talent. In a time before social media scouts, YouTube compliations and ITK’s.

In just has 5th game, he scored twice as Arsenal came from behind to beat Chelsea 2-1 in the FA Cup.

Everytime he began warming up, a buzz would go around the Highbury faithful.

Full of pace, direct running, energy and with a huge smile, it was not hard to fall in love with him.

He provided a freshness to the team, he re-energised the crowd. And we carried that through to the end of the season.

And Arsenal need to make a similar signing this January.

We are top of the league. 5 points clear after 14 games. But we are not favourites.

Post World Cup, we will need something, need someone, to get the crowd bouncing. A jolt to the system, a jump start Arsenal’s title challenge.

And there is no better way of doing that then signing a Reyes-esque player.

We need to be looking to sign someone who is young, exciting, fresh and plays with a smile on their face.

Someone who will put pressure on those players currently in the 1st team. Someone who will re-energise the crowd. Get us on our feet as he warms up in-front of the West stand. Comes on to big cheers in anticipation of what he might do.

This sort of player will quickly stop us becoming stale as we roll in through 2023. Will keep the boo boys away that will jump on us not signing someone (or signing someone withe xperience), and spreading their negativty into our title chase.

We have all seen the links with a certain Ukrainian winger in recent weeks. The hype is real.

Whilst Mykhailo Mudryk, Rafael Leão, Cody Gakpo, or whoever we might sign will mainly be bought in for the next 4 or 5 years, their immediate impact on the terraces and training ground can not be underestimated.

Reyes really did not do much in those 13 league games (6 from the bench). But he gave the team an extra energy when we needed it.

Edu needs to get his man in early, prior to the Spurs game. And the new face, the extra energy, could be the marginal gain we need to beat Tottenham and Manchester United in January.

Keenos

Gabriel Jesus goal drought should not worry Arsenal fans

In recent weeks, Gabriel Jesus has been labelled a “flop summer signing” and come in for criticism for his “lack of goals”.

Now admittedly, the loudest of this criticism has from Liverpool fans, who have taken to criticising Jesus in an attempt to defend Darwin Nunez.

But anyone thinking Jesus has been a flop clearly has little football knowledge.

Football is becoming more and more about systems rather than individuals, and you fit players to your system.

A world class player will struggle if the system they are being asked to play in does not play to their strengths. Likewise an average player can look fantastic in a system that suits him.

And Gabriel Jesus suits Arsenal’s system.

A mate of mine recently said “we should replace Aaron Ramsdale with Jan Oblak”, a perfect example of someone not understanding how important systems are.

Oblak is what we would call a “goal line keeper” – he likes to stay close to his line, and very rarely ventures towards the edge of his box, let alone outside. Petr Cech is another example.

Now Arsenal play with a very high line – Gabriel (the centre back one) and William Saliba defend the half way line.

To hold that highline, you need a keeper whose naturaly starting position is on the edge of his box, rather than his goal line. The sweeper keeper.

Oblak in the Arsenal line up would be horrificially exposed. Just like Cech was when we played for us with our higher line. And Leno.

These sort of keepers would flourish at someone like Spurs – or any Jose Mourinho team – where sides play defensively and with a “low block”.

Likewise Oblak is poor with the ball at his feet.

Whilst he might be the “better goalkeeper” in comparison to Ramsdale, he would not be the goal keeper we need.

Likewise Coady Gakpo.

Gakpo reminds me a lot of Nicolas Pepe – he needs space to run into and flourishes in a counter attacking side.

Arsenal do not play counter attacking football, Gakpo would struggle in our system in the same way Pepe did; Gakpo’s team mate Xavi Simons is a more suitable target.

So back to Arsenal and Jesus.

Arsenal are not set up to feed the ball to a single striker. We have a front 3 and look for them to press and rotate to score a goal.

Compare us to Manchester City.

Alfe Inge Haaland’s son is your old school centre forward. He has no interest in dropping deep, running the channels or assisting others. He just wants to get in the box and score goals.

So City are now set up to engineer the ball into positions for Haaland to score.

Jesus, meanwhile, is a much more mobile forward. He looks to drop deep, run the channels, and go wide.

This season, Arsenal are sharing the goals out amongst the front 3, rather than having a big, single goal scorers.

At the time of writing, Haaland had scored 46% of of Manchester City’s 37 league goals. Phil Foden has scored 16%.

Meanwhile, Gabriel Jesus had scored 16.6% of Arsenal’s 30 league goals. Gabriel Martinelli the same.

Bukayo Saka and Martin Odegaard have both scored 13.3% of Arsenal league goals.

Haaland and Foden account for 62% of Manchester City’s goals; Arsenal’s front 4 account for 60%.

Manchester City’s 3rd top scorer is Kevin de Bruyne with 3 league goals. That is the same as Arsenal’s 5th top scorer – Granit Xhaka.

There is more than one way to skin a cat.

Manchester City have a single focal pointt, Arsenal are spreading the goals throughout the forward line.

What sums it up is we have 4 players in the Premier League top 15 goal scorers this season. Over 25% of the Premier League top scorers play for The Arsenal!

And assists show a similar trend.

Whilst Kevin de Bruyne is the Premier League top creator, Gabriel Jesus and Bukayo Saka are in joint second.

de Bruyne has assisted 25% of all of Manchester City’s goals, whilst Jesus and Saka are both at 16.6% – once again we share the load.

That means Arsenal have more of a goal scoring threat across the pitch – and are more creative.

Now it is all well and good your striker “contributing elsewhere” as long as others are scoring.

One problem we had previously was that Alexandre Lacazette would “put in a shift”, not score and we would draw a blank.

At the moment, whilst Jesus is not scoring, others are.

But likewise, the lone focal point is not perfect.

If Haaland is not scoring, he is doing very little else. City are basically playing with 9 outfield players until he comes alive in and around the box.

Haaland suits City, Jesus suits us.

Only worry about Jesus when Arsenal stop scoring.

Keenos