Tag Archives: Raul Sanllehi

Full extent of Sanllehi’s “tough job” exposed

When Arsene Wenger left 12 months ago, we all knew the club was in a bit of a mess. The feeling was at the time that it would take Ivan Gazidis, Raul Sanllehi and Sven Milsintat 3 summer transfer windows to get the club on the right track.

Gazidis then upped and left. I would say it was a captain leaving a sinking ship, but he was more of a rate scurrying away.

12 months after Wenger’s departure and the picture of how badly the club was being run towards the end of the Gazidis / Wenger  era is now clear to all.

As always, Swiss Ramble puts the clubs financials in simple, easy to understand language, with some pretty graphs alongside it. Before reading the rest of this blog, take your time to read every single Tweet in the below thread. It will give you a greater insight into the financial situation of Arsenal. Knowledge is power.

The success of Liverpool this season highlighted just how poorly Arsenal have been run in recent years.

Arsenal and Liverpool have near identical income excluding player sales, yet Liverpool have managed to build a team that has won the Champions League and ran Man city close, whilst Arsenal built a squad capable of just 5th.

The difference between the two has nothing to do with money put in by owners. What Liverpool FSG put into the club 9 years ago was to write off the debt that the previous owners left behind.

When you look at net spend over the last 5 years, Arsenal have spent £50million more. Yet gross spend Liverpool have spent £200million more.

Liverpool have built a superior squad through:

  • Working the transfer market – buying players with sell on value, and selling high
  • Sensible salary spending

By focusing their transfer on younger players, Liverpool were able to make a profit on almost every player they sold. Over the last 5 years, they have generated £250million more in player sales than Arsenal. This enabled them to then go big on the likes of Alisson and Virgil van Dijk.

Arsenal meanwhile have spent nearly £150million on Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, Alexandre Lacazette and Mesut Ozil. We are basically writing that money off.

Look at what Arsenal have spent on Lucas Perez, Shokdran Mustafi & Granit Xhaka in recent years. Nearly £100million spent, are they really good enough? The truth is in the last 5 years Arsenal have made some very expensive acquisitions that have not worked out.

And it is not just what you buy players for, but what you sell them for.

Arsenal received just £10million for the sale of Alexis Sanchez, Aaron Ramsey, Jack Wilshere, Danny Welbeck and Wojech Szczesny. In January Liverpool sold Dominic Solanke to Bournemouth for £19million.

I estimate that had they been sold a year earlier, the 5 Arsenal players mentioned above would have generated nearly £200million in player sales.

Arsenal have performed poorly in the transfer market over the last 5 years.

The wage bill is also a problem. Perhaps Arsenal’s biggest problem.

We have a lot of money tied up in Ozil, Aubameyang and Henrikh Mkhitaryan. Nearly £750,000 a week. The 3 players take up 18% of Arsenal’s total wage bill.

Whilst Wenger’s socialist wage bill – where the highest earner would only be a certain amount more than the lowest earner – caused us problems, offering big wages to ageing players is also an issue. Especially if we are looking to sell them on.

We are unable to sell Ozil and Mkhitaryan due to their wages.

The pair earn nearly £30million a year between them. It causes us huge problems, especially as neither are exactly performing to the high levels of Mo Salah or Sadio Mane.

So where are Arsenal now?

  • We have too many ageing players on high wages who would not generate much income if sold
  • The overall quality of the squad is not good enough

And this is where it becomes very clear just how tough Sanllehi’s job is.

Sanllehi needs to:

  • Improve the quality of the squad
  • Lower the age of the squad
  • Get more out of Arsenal’s high wage bill

In simple terms, Arsenal need to buy better than what they have, whilst paying the incoming players less than those they are replacing. And we are hamstrung by not getting much money from those leaving.

Kieran Tierney coming in is an example of Sanllehi’s objective in action.

At 22-years-old, Tierney is the sort of young talent Arsenal should be targeting, and at a reported £20million + £5million in add ons, highlights that you do not need to spend £50million to sign a top young, British full back.

Tiernay is also set to agree a contract worth around £75,000 a week. Bosnian Kolasinac is currently on £115,000 a week. £40,000 more than Tierney.

In Tiernay, Arsenal are buying someone younger, cheaper and better than what they currently have. It is the type of deal Sanllehi will have to do more of this summer.

The problem that Sanllehi faces is there a lot of highly paid players that will need to be replaced by younger, cheaper options over the next 2 summers:

Arsenal players over 30

Laurent Koscielny (33)
Nacho Monreal (33)
Sokratis Papastathopoulos (31)
Henrikh Mkhitaryan (30)
Mesut Özil (30)
David Ospina (30)
Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang (30)

The above 7 players (bar perhaps Sokratis & Aubameyang) will need to be replaced over the next 12 months. That is at least 5 senior professionals out the door.

We then have the younger players, on big money, who are not really good enough.

Arsenal players who should not be at the club after 2020

Shkodran Mustafi
Carl Jenkinson
Mohamed Elneny
Emiliano Martínez
Sead Kolašinac
Calum Chambers

So Sanllehi needs to oversee the sale of 11 members over the 25-man senior squad over the next two summers. Each replaced with someone younger, cheaper and better.

Add these 11 players to Welbeck, Cech, Lichsteiner and Ramsey and you are looking at 15 players of the 2018/19 squad likely to leave the club in the 2 summers following. It is a huge turnover of playing staff.

In the summer of 2018 we also released Santi Cazorla, Per Mertersacker and Jack Wilshere.

Sanllehi recently spoke about ensuring that Arsenal do not get into another Ramsey / Sanchez / Ozil situation where you are letting players run down their contract. His opinion is that 12 months prior to their contract expiring, they either sign the deal on the table or are sold. This will generate much needed funds for Arsenal.

For the 2020/21 season, Arsenal may well only have 12 players in the first team squad who were in the 1st team squad in 2018/19

Sokratis Papastathopoulos (32)
Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang (31)
Alexandre Lacazette (29)
Bernd Leno (28)
Granit Xhaka (27)
Héctor Bellerín (25)
Rob Holding (24)
Lucas Torreira (24)
Alex Iwobi (24)
Konstantinos Mavropanos (22)
Ainsley Maitland-Niles (22)
Matteo Guendouzi (21)

To this 12 players you can add the likes of Reiss Nelson, Emile Smith Rowe, Bukayo Saka or Xavier Amaechi, Dan Ballard or Zach Medley and either Eddie Nketiah or Folarin Balogun. That would leave a 1st team squad with 17 players. Over the next 2 summers Arsenal need to buy 8 senior players.

Tiernay will be the first of these. And if Arsenal can get deals over the line for Wilfried Zaha (who I am not a fan of), William Saliba and Gabriel Martinelli this summer it will be a huge step towards addressing the quality and age of the squad.

Those 4 would take the squad for 2020/21 up to 21. Then depending on who is sold this summer (ie If Mustafi leaves, he will be replaced) we will have a further 6  big signings (or promotions from youth) to make in 2020: Ozil replacement, Mustafi replacement, back up left back, back up right back, 2x back up keepers). This would take us to a 27 man senior squad – although some will be under 21 so excluded from the 25 man register Premier League squad.

I would leave us with a squad where the majority of players are under 25, a hungrier, cheaper, more talented squad then we currently have,

Sanllehi has 2 big summers ahead of him. He needs to get it right. But it is not easy.

Keenos

Advertisements

The non-stories surround Arsenal’s search for a technical director

It is well documented that Arsenal are after a technical director.

Since Raul Sanllehi took over from Ivan Gazidis, the Spainard has believed that adding a technical director to off field management team is important.

In recent the last 2 weeks two high profile reported Arsenal targets have decided their future lies elsewhere.

Firstly we have Marc Overmars, who currently holds a similar position at Ajax.

The ex-Arsenal winger Marc Overmars has signed a new contract that keeps him as Ajax’s director of football until 2024.

Some outlets have written the fabricated story that by deciding to remain at Ajax, he has “rejected Arsenal”.

This is simply an unfounded claim.

It was the media who linked Overmars to Arsenal; with the tenuous link that Overmars used to play for Arsenal and is currently a technical director. It was a care of putting 2 and 2 together and getting 5 for the sake of a story.

Arsenal might have spoken to Overmars about the position, just like in my job I speak to competitors employees to discuss if they would be interested in a move. But this discussion would have been done quietly, and certainly not something that would have been leaked to the media.

So the media fabricated a story that Overmars was one of Arsenal’s primary targets; and then the media fabricated a second story that he had rejected us.

The Monchi links were certainly stronger than the Overmars one, and it is interesting to see that he is set to retain to Sevilla 2 years after leaving the Spanish club for Roma.

“I thank Arsenal for their interest,” said Monchi, who worked with Arsenal boss Unai Emery during their time together at Sevilla.

“It has been the club that has shown the most interest in me but, in the end, I evaluated all of the offers I had on the table and I chose the one that convinced me most.

“I had other options, and very important ones that were flashier, but I’ve chosen Sevilla because its sporting project convinced me.”

My feeling over Monchi rejecting us is the role of technical director at Arsenal is not as senior as what he would have wanted.

Whoever comes in will report into Raul Sanllehi, who is Director of Football.

The technical director will not be fully in charge of running the entire playing side of the club, unlike Sanllehi when he joined whilst Ivan Gazidis was CEO.

He will work underneath Sanllehi. The Spaniard will remain ultimately responsible for running the football side of the club and implementing the vision.

The issue is someone like Monchi ,with his experience and track record, would have wanted the ultimately responsibility of running the football side of the club.

Monchi would have worked well under Gazidis, in a similar role that Sanllehi was originally employed to do. However now that we have Sanllehi, we do not need someone as senior.

The technical director at Arsenal will undertake delegated tasks that Sanllehi does not have time to do himself. He will be responsible for implementing Sanllehi’s vision, rather than implementing his own.

The technical director will not be part of Arsenal’s senior management team – Sanhllehi, Vinai Venkatesham and Unai Emery. It will be a position below them. The position will not even require board sign off. Sanllehi can appoint whoever he wants.

It is perhaps a role that Monchi saw as being beneath him. To junior a role.

Yes, Monchi was on the short list, but it is the equivalent of trying to recruit an operations manager for a branch managers role.

The headlines that Arsenal have been “snubbed twice” in their search for a new technical director are simply created for hits.

They show a lack of knowledge and lack of understanding on the role. What or who Arsenal want.

The fact that the role of technical director at Arsenal makes headline news simply highlights how newsworthy we are, and how media outlets rely on using our name for advertising revenue.

Keenos

Sven Mislintat – Truth or Lies?

So “interesting” Le Grove broke some news about Sven Mislintat.

Now I do not know whether this news is true or not. No one really does. The “news” was passed around many bloggers, who were unable to independently verify it. So is there truth in the news, or is it a case of Le Grove decided being first is more important than being accurate?

Without having my own source to verify if it is true or not, here is my take on a few things:

Everyone knew but no one said

When Le Grove “broke” the news, other bloggers came out and said that they had “heard the same at the weekend”. If so many were told the news, why did no one say? Did they not trust the source?

The 3 sources

Le Grove also says that he has 3 different sources who told him over the weekend of the news. If there were this many sources, it is clearly a leaky story. Why was the story not picked up by anyone?

Lack of real media

So every blogger seemed to know, despite not breaking the news themselves. There were 3 sources. Yet not one single proper media outlet had reported the story?

Surely with such a leaky story, the likes of John Cross or Matt Law would have written a story? They have reputations of writing stories without concrete evidence. The story is perfect for click bait journalists.

The only media outlets who have picked up the story at the time of writing were 101 goals (not a real news site), The Independent (not a real newspaper) and the Metro (click bait kings).

The Independent article is filled with speculation and rumours. If Miguel Delaney (who wrote the article) knew all of that information, why did he not write about it sooner?

No noise from Germany

There has also been little noise from Germany. If Bayern Munich were discussing a move with him, would it not also have broken in Germany?

New job jitters

As a recruiter, I know how often people get the new job jitters. Many people join a company, are sold that company, only to find after 6 months or so that it is not the company for them.

It might be the culture of the company, they might have been miss-sold the job, or they might have realised the grass is not greener.

The new regime

Sven Mislintat was recruited whilst Arsene Wenger was manager and Ivan Gazidis was CEO. Raul Sanllehi and Unai Emery now hold these positions.

It is very plausible that Mislintat does not get on with his new bosses.

A different direction

Likewise, Sanllehi might not get on with Mislintat. He might have pushed the German to one side to enforce his own views on the recruitment, perhaps siding with his compatriot Emery when it came to the crunch.

Homesick?

Working in a new country can be daunting. Not everyone settles down.

Mislintat is from Kamen, a town on the outskirts of Germany. It is not unreasonable that after a year living in London, he is pining for a return to Germany.

Arteta and Allegri

Many of the people saying that they were told over the weekend of this news also hugely went for either Arteta or Allegri to replace Wenger. There sources were wrong on that occasion. Was it the same source?

 

Ultimately, we will not know the truth until it comes out. Until then it is just speculation….

Keenos