Tag Archives: She Wore

The Ludicrous Response to Arsene Wenger’s Push

promo309371172Arsene Wenger was a silly boy on Sunday. He made a mistake pushing referee Anthony Taylor in those tense closing minutes having been given his marching orders by Jon Moss. But the fall out in the media has been hilarious, with journalists far and wide calling for all sorts of punishments, from having to manage Sunday league football, through to a 10 game touchline ban.

Below are a collection of our favourites so far:

First up is Tony Evans in the Evening Standard. Now before I start, a little rant.

Why does the Evening Standard, a London based paper which reports on what is happening in London, employ a Scouser who supports Liverpool to give his view on the weekend’s game? The man is a scab who is still happy to get a pay day from News International when working on TalkSport.

nafyq5t

Evans calls for Wenger to be hit with a 10-game ban. Now back in 2012, Alan Pardew shoved an assistant referee. I have looked through the archives of all the papers Evans has worked (and subsequently been let go) for and at no point did he write anything on Alan Pardew. Let alone call for a 10-game ban.

Pardew got a 2-game ban and a £20,000 fine. Surely a precedent set by the FA that they will have to stick with – anymore and Arsenal will win any sort of appeal. But Evans, like every other journalist, seems to be ignoring the Pardew incident.

ddddd

Why is Evans so demanding, vocal, about Wenger, but was so silent about Pardew? Is it because he is still bitter about 1989 – like so many Liverpool journalists; or still upset Arsenal fans cheered when it was announced that trains back to Liverpool for Everton fans had been cancelled?

Most likely, he knows that a story about Pardew pushing a referee is not of public interest. A call for him to get a 10-game ban will not get the hits. Meanwhile he knows that by beating Wenger with the shitty-stick, the hits will role in.

https://twitter.com/DickinsonTimes/status/823587691606511616

The Times Chief Sports Writer, Matt Dickinson, suggests an alternative punishment. A community service order. He claims that Arsene Wenger should be forced to manage a Sunday League game for 10 games so that he can learn “a lesson in how hard it is”.

This is laughable.

Firstly Wenger knows how hard it is, he manages at the highest level of the game, where the stresses and strains are felt the most. If his side loses a game, he suffers abuse and questions about his future. He has to live football, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Of course, he is rewarded handsomely for it.

Without wishing to demean a Sunday League manager, if they lose, they do not dwell on it, they head straight down the boozer and have a beer with their players. On Monday they go to work at their office job, or on a building site, and forget about football.

Managing in the Sunday league would be a cake walk for Wenger.

As for the demand that it is community service, lightly pushing an assistant in a moment of madness is not exactly up there with Eric Cantona karate kicking a fan.

Clearly Matt Dickinson is after some attention, realising that an outlandish, random suggestion of a punishment will get him that attention and build is profile. Afterall, it is an online profile that all journalists need now to become successful, it is no longer about the quality of their writing.

Maybe the next time a journalist is found to have written a fake story, or exaggerated the facts, they should be forced to go and write for a local free paper for 10-weeks. That way they can learn a lesson of how hard real journalism is.

Following in the footsteps of Tony Evans, we have James Olley, The Evening Standard’s Chief Football Correspondent.

Now some of you might not know this, but James Olley is an Arsenal fan. In his article in last nights Evening Standard, he claims that he has been informed by a source that Arsene Wenger called Jon Moss a “cheat”. I have a feeling he has made this up.

And why would an Arsenal fan in the media make something up that harms the club and its management? For clicks! We have it again, another journalist with a sensationalist view point, making things up, for hits and attention. To repeat, in the current world of journalism, it is all about how far your articles reach and how many hits they garner, rather than the quality and truthfulness of your story.

It is why we are seeing the rise of fake news. It is all about the advertising revenue, driven by how many people click your links. Better to have a poor journalist who gets hundreds of thousands of hits due to 10s of thousands of followers on Twitter, than a good journalist who has little online presence, but is a bloody good writer.

At no point does Olley indicate who his source is. It could be just a bloke in the crowd. It could be the magical leprechaun that sits on his shoulder, or maybe he went on a bit of a session with Tony Evans after the game, and between them they concocted the stories that they both created to ensure a big pay day for the Evening Standard. Well that is what my source told me anyway. Can’t reveal them though.

c23ofmnw8aaltf9Penultimately we come onto Keith Hackett.

Former Premier League referee. Former referees’ assessor. General manager of the Professional Game Match Officials Board. A man who in 2009, had to apologise to Arsene Wenger when the Frenchman was sent off in a game against Manchester United by Mike Dean for that horrendous crime of kicking over a water bottle.

Hackett says that a 1 or 2 game ban for Wenger “will not cut it on this occasion”. Hackett is another one who said nothing about Alan Pardew’s incident in 2012. Why is it that he was silent then, but so noisy now?

He go’s on to say Wenger should receive a 6 game, full stadium ban, going against the precedent that the FA set with Alan Pardew.

In his article, it is interesting that Hackett writes a good few hundred words on Wenger’s behaviour and assault on Anthony Taylor, but does not at any point mention Sean Dyche’s 90 minute verbal assault on Taylor.

Whilst what Wenger did was wrong, and Hackett is right that it does send out the wrong message to the wider football world, what Dyche did was equally wrong. 90 minutes of shouting and screaming at the referee.

Why has Hackett decided to only put across what Wenger did, rather than do the fair thing and also mention that Dyche’s behaviour over 90 minutes was also despicable? Of course, its because Dyche is a nobody who manages a tiny club up North. An article calling for a ban for him due to verbally assaulting a referee for 90 minutes just won’t get the hits.

The less said about Deluded Duncan the better.

 

I imagine throughout today, other journalists will realise that a ludicrous article calling for all sorted of weird punishments for Arsene Wenger will get them hits. I imagine this is not the end of the matter.

Also if you want to read the response from some but hurt Burnley fans, have a look at our comments page from the morning blog.

And how they will all moan, write more articles, and complain, when the FA are forced to follow their own precedent and give Wenger just a 2 game ban.

Arsene Wenger should be given a  2-match ban, a fine, and a warning about his future behaviour. No more, no less. End of debate.

Keenos

Arsene Wenger sent off for standing up to thuggish Burnley

So Arsene Wenger got sent off at the weekend (or asked to leave the touchline, why do referee’s no longer show manager’s the red card?) and I for one was delighted. It showed there is still life in the old dog yet.

promo309371172

From the 1st minute, Sean Dyche and his assistant were harassing the 4th official Anthony Taylor. I do not think there was a moment in the match where one of them was in Taylor’s ear. Screaming at him, trying to influence him. A lot of the time the Burnley coaching staff were double teaming him.

Wenger, full of class, barely moved whilst this was going on. Some will say it showed a lack of passion, but it is more that Wenger has often been able to rise above this sort of behaviour. The behaviour Jose Mourinho has shown over the years, the behaviour Dyche showed at the weekend. You could easily argue that Wenger, at times, makes it easy for referees to side against Arsenal as he gives them such an easy time.

Everyone has their snapping point, however, and Wenger snapped in those closing minutes.

He had sat there watching Dyche and his assistant moaning at every single decision that went against Burnley. Meanwhile, referee Jon Moss was giving the Northerners everything, ignoring their thuggish behaviour whilst punishing Arsenal at every opportunity.

In the opening 2 minutes, Olivier Giroud had been thrown to the ground twice by Burnley defenders. It seems there is an unwritten rule in English football that defenders are allowed to pull and push Giroud around how they deem fit without punishment, but as soon as he lays a finger on them, it is a foul.

So Moss was ignoring the thuggish behaviour on Giroud, and then in the 2nd minute blew up for the 1st free kick. A challenge by Nacho Monreal which saw the Spaniard win the ball was incorrectly called as a foul.

As soon as the tackle went in, Dyche and his assistant were in Taylor’s ear, shouting, screaming, clearly demanding a booking. It was not even a foul, let alone a booking.

https://twitter.com/PR_WhoRu/status/823235999211917312

The press used to love saying Arsenal do not like it up them – labelling the side as soft. I believe this actually led referees incorrectly officiating games against Arsenal. It caused them to not give blatant fouls against Arsenal players because, in their mind, Arsenal were just being soft. This was highlighted most in a game I remember against Stoke City a good 7 or 8 years ago.

Arsenal lost 2-1 and the same rhetoric went up, Arsenal are easily bullied. But the press ignored the fact that Stoke went above a beyond simply playing hard.

Arsenal ended the game with 10 men as first Bacary Sagna and then Emmanuel Adebayor were taken out in crude fashion. The Adebayor one particularly sticks in the mind. The ball was out of play, Adebayor was off the pitch, and a Stoke thug came in taking him out. The ref did not reach for a card.

The game ended up with Theo Walcott being stretchered off the field with a shoulder injury. Like Adebayor, he was caught late and hard. It was a foul. Nothing given. But of course, it was not Stoke’s fouls that was highlighted, but Arsenal being weak. The referee should have stopped the behaviour in the first minute, but allowed it to continue. The ref was as much to blame for injuries as the Stoke players.

We had not seen this kind of behaviour against Arsenal for a while, but Burnley clearly went into Sunday’s game with the mantra that Arsenal are soft as they tried to kick us off the park. Luckily no Arsenal player was badly injured, despite a lack of protection and fairness from the referee.

Arsenal players were pushed and pulled, they were elbowed, they were stamped on, but Jon Moss turned a blind eye to it all. Stephen Defour stamped on Granit Xhaka twice. Alexis Sanchez pushed out of the way as he headed within the area. A blatant penalty . And still Dyche and his assistant were screaming at the Taylor. Trying to influence him and Moss. And it clearly worked.

c2yn9jpxuaiivwi

Why at no point did Taylor tell Dyche to sit down and shut up, or threaten to send him off, is beyond me. He was probably intimidated by a thuggish Northerner. Scared to tell him to be quiet for the fear of a verbal volley and getting covered in spit and bile.

Then we had the penalty incident. The fact that Jon Moss waved this away showed just how biased he was throughout the match. It was a blatant foul on Mustafi. Of course, Dyche was straight up, in Taylor’s ear, probably demanding that Mustafi be booked for diving.

We then had Granit Xhaka’s red card. Was it a foul? Yes. Was it a red card? borderline.

I have seen players get away with a lot worse this season, and am sure the reaction of the Burnley bench, lead by Dyche, and the Burnley players surrounding the referee, influenced the decision.

Not too long later, Mesut Ozil was bought down by a crude challenge.

Dean Marney went in on Ozil, from behind, studs up, thigh high, and ended up scissoring him. It was a disgusting challenge, much more dangerous and filled with intent than Xhaka’s. The ref reached to his pocket and pulled out a card. It was yellow rather than red.

Maybe had the Arsenal fans made it a hostile atmosphere for the ref, maybe had Wenger whinged, bitched a moaned to Anthony Taylor for the duration of the game, Marney would have got the marching orders he deserved, but Wenger has more class than that.

Marney actually injured himself in the challenge. Hopefully he will be out for a long time. The game does not need thugs like him in it.

Arsenal tried to take time out of the game, slowing it down at every opportunity. When sides come to Arsenal and do this, referees ignore it. They act like it is not happening. As soon as Arsenal started to do it, Jon Moss was on the players back. Telling them to hurry up. Pointing to his watch. Dyche still in Taylor’s ear, ensuring more and more time was to be added on. It eventually ended up as 7 minutes.

Wenger eventually blew his top in the 93rd minute when Francis Coquelin gave away the penalty which led to Andre Gray’s equaliser. Gray made a meal of it. It was less of a penalty than the challenge on Mustafi. After 93 minutes of being on the end of poor referee decisions, Wenger lost it.

He questioned Jon Moss for the 1st time in the game to Anthony Taylor and was promptly told to leave the dug out area. He went and stood in the tunnel area before being chased by Taylor like a school boy playing kiss chase. He then lashed out at Taylor, demanding to know why he was being asked to leave the stadium he built.

Whilst all this was going on, Sean Dyche was sitting there smugly, laughing to himself. He had got away with it all game. Abusing the officials, complaining at every decision, and here were Burnley, about to take a point away at the Emirates, it would be the greatest day in Burnley’s history. Dyche had got Wenger sent off, he had gotten Xhaka sent off. He was the master of Arsenal’s downfall.

c2yzdn1xgaeo6fs

Jon Moss still had one more error to make. In the closing minutes Laurent Koscielny was kicked in the head by another Burnley thug. Moss did not even think it was a foul, where as it should have been a red card. Studs up to the face? Not a foul in Moss’s eyes.

Luckily the linesman made the right call, Arsenal got the penalty, and Alexis Sanchez slotted it away cooly. 2-1 to The Arsenal. Cheaters never prosper.

At the final whistle, Burnley players surrounded the referee, clearly questioning why he had given the penalty. They were probably confused that after 97 minutes of favourable decisions, Moss had given one the other way. Probably asking why, after Burnley’s equaliser, Moss did not reduce the time added on from 7 minutes to 4. Moss looked distraught at Arsenal’s winner.

c2yh8mtwiaab-ib

Wenger kept his dignity throughout and paid the price. Maybe next time we play a side of Northern thugs, he should rant and rave on the sideline from the first minute. Then we might actually get a favourable decision.

Burnley, Dyche, Moss and Taylor, we overcame you all to get the deserved 3 points.

Keenos

Dimitri Payet and Arsenal

With Dimitri Payet on his way out of West Ham, a lot of Arsenal fans have been discussing throughout social media whether the club should target him. A lot are saying he is a no brainer, whilst many think we should stay well clear. Here are some thoughts…

A Short Term Option?

Dimitri Payet is 30 in March. Signing him would be a short term option. A lot of people will point to the fact that Santi Cazorla and Ian Wright came to Arsenal late, but Cazorla joined Arsenal just shy of his 28th birthday, he was more than 2 years younger than Payet.

Likewise Ian Wright – often held up as the proof that players can succeed having made a big move late in their career – was also just 27 when he joined Arsenal.

Getting in a 29 (nearly 30) year old Dimitri Payet would mean Arsenal writing off his transfer fee (as we would unlikely make anything selling him on) and also potentially tying up a lot of wages (4 years at £120,000 is £25,000,000) In a player who in 18 months time might not be the quality player he is now.

Would it be worthwhile tying up that money on a short term option?

Why Would Arsenal Sign Payet?

Payet is a brilliant (but inconsistent) player. There are a good few reasons why it would be worthwhile Arsenal signing him, even if it is just to have him at a high level of performances for the next 18 months:

  • Champions League – He is not Champions League tied. Probably the best player in world football that has not played Champions League football this season. Hence why he has been linked with the likes of Real Madrid and PSG
  • Premier League – Back in 2004, Arsenal signed Jose Antonio Reyes. He performed well for the club for 18 months before going a bit loopy. But in those 18 months, and especially in the first 6 of those, his freshness and ability pushed Arsenal to another level that saw the side go unbeaten. Payet in January could push Arsenal to the Premier League title (or Champions League!)
  • Alexis Sanchez & Mesut Ozil – As it stands, both are in contract dispute. By getting Payet it, Arsenal would then have already signed a short term replacement for one of them were either to leave. Signing Payet now would take the pressure off the summer transfer window. And if both sign? Payet simply makes us stronger
  • Solving the wide issues – With Sanchez playing up top and Walcott injured, Arsenal lack wingers. Hence Iwobi, Oxlade-Chamberlain & Ramsey playing wide in recent weeks. Payet is better than all 3 and even when Walcott returns, Payet would still start

Fitness & Attitude

The two biggest reasons not to sign Dimitri Payet are his fitness and his attitude.

If we are talking about Payet as a short term option, we would expect him to perform for the club immediately. But he looks a little over weight. A lot off the pace. It might take him a few months to get git. At which point 2016/17 is over.

Secondly his attitude with West Ham has been shocking. And this is not a new thing. One of the key reasons he has never made it at a big club previously was due to a poor attitude. It took his exceptional 2015/16 form for Didier Deschamps to over look the poor attitude and give him a regular chance for France.

Arsene Wenger has previously shown an intolerance to players with a poor attitude, Samir Nasri springs to mind. Is the divisions Payet could cause within the squad worth his talent?

Santi Cazorla Comparison

A lot have grouped Payet and Cazorla together. Mainly because they are both diminutive 2 footed playmakers who saw their best performances materialise at a later age. But it is wrong to compare them.

Cazorla saw his performances peak when he played deeper. When you play deeper, you need some sort of defensive awareness, and the willingness to put a foot in occasionally. Cazorla adapted his game and started to do some defensive work. The same can not be expected of Payet.

Payet is more similar to Ozil than Cazorla. Talented playmaker but lazy defensively. Any West Ham fan will tell you that for all his excellence going forward last season, he would not track his full back. Putting him deeper in the middle of the park would leave us exposed as he simple would not provide us with any sort of defensive cover.

Payet is not the same player as Santi Cazorla.

payet-635246

The New Andrei Arshavin?

If Payet is not a Cazorla clone, what player does he remind me of? The closest I can think of is Andrei Arshavin. In fact, there games are near identical.

At their peak, both are diminutive tricky players who can beat a man for fun, but are not blessed with heaps of pace. They can stick one in the top corner from anywhere on the pitch, but also have a tendency to go missing.

Before we signed Arshavin, I had followed him a bit in Russia. He performed once every 5 games. So it was not a surprise when he came to Arsenal and put in similar inconsistent performances. Arshavin’s career before, during and after Arsenal was inconsistent.

Payet is similar, and it is why, at 29, he has never played for a major club and, prior to joining West Ham, barely had any France caps. He is inconsistent.

For Marseille, he would be phenomenal one week, then go missing the next. West Ham was similar. Even in games, he would do nothing during a game, then curl in a free kick. He was brilliant last season for the Hammers, but he was also very poor in games.

At West Ham you can afford that sort of inconsistency. As a fan of a smaller club you can ignore the games he disappears for. Arsenal can not afford it.

Arshavin was a good signing for Arsenal at the time, he almost single handly got us into the Champions League in his 1st 5 months at the club. Payet could do similar.

 

When it comes to Dimitri Payet, I am firmly on the fence. I think his talent does justify his short term-ness, and Arsenal no longer need to think about sell on fees, but were we not to sign him, I would not exactly be upset as we are not desperately in need for him, and there are plenty of reasons to not recruit him.