Another Arsenal youngster leaves for foreign climate

So another talented youngster is set to leave Arsenal.

Stephy Mavididi joins Marcus McGuane (Barcelona), Chris Willock (Benfica), Donyell Malen (PSV), Kaylen Hinds (VfL Wolfsburg), Daniel Crowley (Willem II) and Vlad Dragomir (Perugia) to have left the club in the last 12 months for a new challenge abroad.

On the face of it, the mass exodus of Arsenal youngsters would be a concern, but when you dig deep, you realise things are not as bad as they seem.

Whilst some of the players might have gone to some of Europe’s stellar names – Barcelona and Juventus in the cases of McGuane and Mavididi – none of yet to really make any sort of break through to prove Arsenal were wrong in letting them leave.

In Marcus McGuane’s case, there was plenty of fake new surrounding a “first team debut” in a game that was not competitive.

Making the Arsenal first team squad is not an easy task, and nor should it be.

Some will say these players should have been “given their chance at Arsenal” but none of them have exactly yet been given a chance at their new club either.

In the case of Stephy Mavididi, should he have been “given a chance” at Arsenal? Should he have got game time ahead of Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang or Alexandre Lacazette? Clearly not.

Expecting him to get minutes ahead of these two is just silly.

“but he could have played in the League Cup” you cry. Yes, he could have, but it was Eddie Nketiah who got those minutes playing 10 games last season across the League Cup, Europa League and Premier League.

Meanwhile Mavididi spent the first half of the season on loan at Preston (11 games; 0 goals) and the second half of the season at Charlton (15 games; 2 goals). He got chances at these clubs and did not really take them.

So he is behind Eddie Nketiah in the pecking order at Arsenal. I think we can all agree with that.

Moving into this season, you can only really give one of them the minutes in the Europa League and League Cup – especially if you are trying to give game time to both Aubameyang and Lacazette.

Nketiah is a year younger than Mavididi and a better player.

That leaves Arsenal with 3 choices when it comes to Mavididi:

  1. Keep him at the club, playing youth team games – Although this would then reduce playing time for some of the talented 17 and 18 year olds, and Nketiah will still be stepping down to the U23s this season, starting ahead of Mavididi
  2. Loan him out – Do we really want to be like Chelsea, giving 18 year old lads 5 year deals and then loaning them across Europe for the duration of their contract. The average age of Chelsea’s 32 strong long contingent is 22. They have a 24 year old on loan who will never play for them
  3. Sell him – Give him the chance to make a permanent move somewhere, to start afresh, whether it be at home or abroad

I really do not agree with Chelsea’s policy of hoarding lots of talented young players and loaning them across Europe.

Lewis Baker is now 23-years old and onto his 5th loan deal. Kenneth Omeruo is 24 years-old and on his 6th loan deal. 22-year old Joao Rodríguez is in his 9th loan deal since Chelsea signed him 5 years ago.

The way Chelsea treat these players is unfair. If a player is not good enough, let him free, release him, sell him. that is what Arsenal have done.

Arsenal let Kaylen Hinds leave because they had Mavididi and Nketiah coming through. Chris Willock got overtaken by his younger brother Joe.

Marcus McGaune left after seeing his chances of breaking through reduce due to the development of a player 6 months older than him – last year Ainsley Maitland-Niles played 28 games.

You can not develop them all, give them all the game time that they demand. So what you need to do is focus on the better ones. Those that are ahead of the rest. Those most likely to make it.

Players like Maitland-Niles, Joe Willock and Reiss Nelson got some game time last season.

To get a chance at Arsenal, firstly you have to be better than those 3, or better than Kostadinos Mavropanos (still just 20) or better than Matteo Guendouzi (just 19). you actually need to be good enough to get your chance. We are no Make a Wish Foundation; giving players minutes just for the sake of it.

Emile Smith Rowe is just 18-years old. He massively impressed during pre-season and is clearly the top young talent at the club in terms of attacking midfielders. This season, if there is a chance to play a young number 10 in the League Cup, should we give that chance to Smith Rowe, or someone older than him who is not as good?

Focus the development on those players who are best, or show the most potential.

And if that means the likes of Mavididi or McGuane leave the club before “getting a chance” then so-be-it. If there are better players ahead of you, you have no right to “get a chance”.

I prefer quality over quantity. It would be better to concentrate on developing the best 2 or 3 youngsters at the club, than continuing to develop a dozen players who ultimately will not be good enough.

This season I want to see Maitland-Niles, Willock, Nelson, Mavropanos, Guendouzi, Nketiah and Smith Rowe get the game time.

This would be an exciting young XI to play in the League Cup, and if you are older than those below, and not ahead in terms of develop, it is probably time to move on.

OseiTutu Mavropanos Holding Bola
AMN Guendouzi
Nelson Willock SmithRowe

I wish every Arsenal player who has left the club a lot of luck, especially those who have made a decision to go abroad. It is a brave decision that more young English players should do.

More youngsters need to look at Willock, Hinds, McGuane and Jadon Sancho (ex-Manchester City) and shun the British academies at 18. Rather than sign a new deal with your English club, to spend 4 years being loaned around the hell holes of the country, pack your bags and go abroad.

It will make them better players in the long run and, worse case scenario, if it does not work out, they have a fantastic experience behind them.

And eventually, if enough do it, the English national team will improve.

England players lack culture. Lack different footballing skills learned having played in different countries.

Not just at youth level, but at senior level English players do not move abroad. They would rather play for Stoke earning £60,000 a week, then go and join Celta Vigo, Bordeaux or Genoa.

If more English players, especially youngster, move abroad, the English team will improve. They would have had a different education, learnt new skills, and be a more rounded footballer.

Whilst none of Willock, Hinds, McGuane or Sancho can yet be labelled as a roaring success, all 4 should be congratulated for being brave and making that move.

As for Mavididi, going to Juventus is a huge move for him. He is a long way from the Arsenal first team, so a move to Italy will be much better than staying at Arsenal, and spending another season on loan somewhere in the home-counties.

For youth players, it is so hard to go from prospect to first teamer. More fail than make it. Mavididi has found himself behind a younger talent in Nketiah and has decided to move on.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.