Category Archives: Arsenal

A victory for squad depth

No Bukayo Saka
No Martin Odegaard
No William Saliba
No Kai Havertz
No Ben White

We went to Atletico Bilbao with half a starting XI out missing, including arguably our 3 best players, and won 2-nil. It was a victory for squad depth.

Mikel Arteta spoke in the summer about changing the make-up of Arsenal’s squad. He no longer wanted to rank players as A, B and C. Instead, he wanted a squad with a higher floor, where he could pick on 20 players without seeing a drop off in quality.

A year ago we would have been concerned about going to the 4th best team in Spain without so many top players. But this 2025 squad is made different.

The fact that even without the 5 missing superstars, we could win so comfortably really is a testament to Arteta and Andrea Berta building a fantastic squad.

Noni Madueke, Mikel Merino, Cristhian Mosquera, Viktor Gyokeres and Jurrien Timber were the 5 to start and there was zero drop off in quality.

And then add in Myles Lewis Skelly and Thomas Partey, both of whom would have started 6 months ago. And then you are perhaps beginning to see the step up in squad depth.

The cherry on the cake is that Arteta was able to bring on players of the calibre of Gabriel Martinelli and Leandro Trossard, despite missing 3 key attackers, and it was those subs that took us to victory.

Arteta’s place for this season was built on the semi-final defeat to PSG last year.

Losing 2-1 in the game and 3-1 on aggregate, Saka had thrown us a life line with 15 minutes to go. It would have been a huge task, but we were not out of the tie.

Arteta turned to his bench to see what attacking options he had. Players that could make an impact in the final 20-25 minutes. He saw Raheem Sterling, Ethan Nwaneri and Nathan Butler-Oyedeji. He opted for Ben White.

Now some will say that this was by his design. That he had not signed the attackers we needed over successive summers. And I get that. But he was also robbed of Kai Havertz and Gabriel Jesus. Two senior forwards who could have made an impact.

Role on to last night and Jesus and Havertz were still nowhere to be seen. But instead of Arteta looking at the attacking options on the bench and feeling his heart sink, he was able to bring on game changers.

Nearly two years ago I was blogging about Arteta taking inspiration from Eddie Jones and his finisher concept. It feels like the rest of the world has caught up following Trossard and Martinelli’s moments.

Too many fans were quick to write off the pair. Demand we cash in. But both have shown that they are able to change games.

Trossard, for me, has always been a supersub. His instinctive, off the cuff play benefits from the chaos of the closing stages of a game. And likewise Martinelli could become a suuperb option off the bench with his direct, tireless running at fullback who have already faced 70 minutes.

Neither is particularly suited to Arteta’s structured build up play (nor is Noni Madueke). But the pair, alongside Mdueke, will thrive in the chaos of the final 20 minutes when the play is less structured and they are facing tired defences. Their instructions will be simple: Go make something happen. And against Bilbao they did.

So we get 3 points from a tough away fixture. Based on last season, we need to win 4 from 8 to qualify for the play-offs and 5 wins and a draw to be top 8.

UTA.

Keenos

Tony Pullis peddles lies about history with Arsenal

The latest trend of ex-footballers is to go onto podcasts and peddle lies in an attempt to create a narrative that you were better then what you were.

What these players forget is they all played during the internet-era, when games were live on TV and incidents documented onlines. So why they think they can lie and get away with it is beyond me.

The likes of Troy Deeney and Jay Bothroyd have already done the podcast rounds. And both consistently use the name of Arsenal Football Club in an attempt to highlight how great they were. Both have shown themselves to be liars.

Now we have Tony Pullis doing the rounds. And like Deeney and Bothroyd, he loves telling stories about how he had one over Arsenal.

Now granted, Pullis had an unbelievable record against Arsenal, considering he was managing a small club like Stoke City. And that is why I do not understand why he feels the need to lie about his experiences in playing us.

He has countless examples of getting one over Arsene Wenger, so it is baffling that he decides to embellish the truth in an attempt to boost his own standing in the game.

In a recent podcast I watched, Pulis said:

And Patrick Vieira and Jens Lehmann were on a coaching course with me. They were waiting for me afterwards and I was thinking “what are they going to say to me, two Arsenal players, we absolutely mullered them most of the time at the Britannia”.

Whilst Pullis had that great record against us, “mullered” is a little bit of an over exageration. But one to expect when they are just looking for viral clips. It is what comes next though that Pullis should hang his head for:

So they wait for me and they tell me this story that the only time Arsene Wenger coached defensive work was in that cup game.

Arsenal played Stoke City twice in gthe FA Cup with Pullis and Wenger in charge of their relative clubs – 2005 and 2010. The 2005 game, Stoke were not a Premier League club and Wenger had only played once against them – back in a 1996 League Cup game. It is highly unlikely that Wenger would have specially prepared for Stoke in 2005, so we can assume he is talking about 2010.

They say they get there and Rory [Delap] is not playing. Not only does Rory not play, but you murder us 3-1.

The 2005 game, Arsenal won 2-1. And Rory Delap was a Southampton player. The 2010 game was a 3-1 victory to Stoke. So this is conclusive evidence that Pullis is talking about the 2010 game.

What Pullis is clearly trying to do is show that he masterminded a victory over Wenger. That by not playing Rory Delap, he got in Wenger’s head and they cruised to victory. But how true was this?

The 2nd paragraph of the BBC match report states Fuller headed home Rory Delap’s long throw inside two minutes. Delap started the game, and was taken off on 84 minutes. So why has Pullis tried to change history when it is very clear that Delap played, and was highly infleuntial in the game?

But it is not just the Delap playing or not playing that Pullis is embelishing as he continues:

They say Wenger comes in afterwards and he is lost for words.

But did they really say that? In 2010, neither of Patrick Vieira or Jens Lehmann played. But it gets deeper, they were not even at Arsenal football Club.

Patrick Vieira left us in 2005, and was playign for Inter Milan in 2010, whilst Jen Lehmann was playing VfB Stuttgart; he did not return to the club until 2011.

Now cast your mind back to 2005. Arsenal won 2-1. Which two Arsenal players played in that victory? Vieira and Lehmann.

Pullis has embellished a conversation he had with two Arsenal legends about a game neither played in, to promote himself as a great manager. And that is highlighted in his final words on the matter.

Usually he would blame [thrown ins] “We should ban throw ins and that and the other”. He had nowhere to go.

This shows that Pullis was just trying to show how he mastermidned a victory against Wenger, got in his head, and Wenger could not point to Delap’s long throws. Except it was all a lie.

Remember that 2nd paragraph of the BBC’s match report? Fuller headed home Rory Delap’s long throw inside two minutes.

Pullis has peddled this story mutiple times across many podcasts.

I am not sure why a podcast mic and a few cameras are leading managers and players to lie about what happened. Especially when they know everything is documented in this internet-era.

It would actually be quite fun for clubs, management or players to take these average players and management to court over what they say. It is an attempt to damage the reputation of those they are speaking about. Is is slander.

Of course, that will never happen and our legends will rise above it.

But we just all need to remember, when listening to podcasts are those speaking actually telling the truth? Or are they lying in an attempt to raise themselves up and bring us down.

Keenos

MATCH REPORT: Arsenal 3-0 Nottingham Forest

Arsenal underlined their title credentials with a convincing 3-0 victory over Nottingham Forest at the Emirates, combining authority in possession with clinical finishing. Despite losing captain Martin Ødegaard early to injury, the Gunners controlled the match throughout and were rewarded with a brace from Martín Zubimendi and a goal from Viktor Gyökeres.

First Half

Arsenal began with intensity, pinning Forest back and dictating the tempo. Their movement in wide areas caused problems, while Forest struggled to escape their own half. The breakthrough arrived in the 32nd minute when a corner from Noni Madueke was half-cleared to the edge of the box. Zubimendi, perfectly positioned, struck a crisp volley that deflected past Matz Sels into the net.

The opening goal capped Arsenal’s dominance, but the half was overshadowed by the early withdrawal of Ødegaard. The captain landed awkwardly after a challenge and, holding his shoulder, was unable to continue, with teenager Ethan Nwaneri coming on in his place. Forest, meanwhile, offered little in reply. Their best efforts came from set-pieces, though David Raya dealt comfortably with any danger.

Second Half

Arsenal struck almost instantly after the restart. Riccardo Calafiori launched a precise ball forward that Eberechi Eze latched onto. The midfielder surged down the flank before squaring low for Gyökeres, who applied a composed finish from close range to make it 2-0.

Forest tried to mount a response and nearly pulled one back when Chris Wood controlled a cross on his chest and fired toward goal, only for Raya to produce a sharp stop. That was as close as they came, with Arsenal quickly reasserting control. Madueke’s direct running, combined with Eze’s creativity, continually stretched Forest’s defensive shape.

As the visitors pushed forward in search of a lifeline, spaces opened up for Arsenal to exploit. The decisive third goal arrived in the 79th minute from another set-piece. Leandro Trossard delivered an inviting cross, and Zubimendi rose highest to power home a header, sealing both the match and his personal double.

Analysis

The victory lifts Arsenal to nine points from their first four Premier League games, leaving them firmly in the early title conversation. Manager Mikel Arteta will be pleased with the cohesion shown by his new signings. Eze looked at home in midfield, Madueke provided consistent menace on the wing, and Gyökeres opened his league account with a striker’s finish.

Zubimendi was the clear standout, scoring twice from midfield and controlling possession with authority. Defensively, Arsenal also impressed, with Cristhian Mosquera and Calafiori ensuring Forest rarely created chances in open play.

For Forest, this result highlighted the challenge facing Ange Postecoglou as he looks to instill his philosophy. His side lacked composure in possession and rarely tested Arsenal’s back line, save for Wood’s effort. They will need time to adapt and improve if they are to avoid slipping into early relegation trouble.

Conclusion

This was a polished and professional display from Arsenal. They overcame the setback of losing their captain, showcased squad depth, and delivered the kind of performance that fuels belief in a sustained challenge. For Forest, it was a reminder of the gulf they must bridge against the league’s elite.

DJ