Category Archives: Arsenal

Feed the Scousers – Terrace Banter or Obscenely Offensive

With today being the last game at Anfield before Christmas Day, it is the last chance for the football community to come together for the annual Feed the Scousers campaign.

If you are heading up to Liverpool today, ensure to take a can of tuna or baked beans to lob into the away end. As always, the Liverpool fans will be grateful for anything that is free.

Jokes aside, when did it become a thing to be offended about the Feed the Scousers song?

Feed the Scousers, let them know it’s Christmas time.
Feed the Scousers, let them know it’s Christmas time.

It has been sung decades, for as long as I have been going football. My first memory of it was as a 14 or 15 at Highbury, and I do not even think we were playing one of the Liverpool clubs at the time.

Now I get that there are many songs that were sung in the 90s that are no longer appropriate by 2023 moral standards, and many more than were sung back then that were not appropriate by any standards.

For years, we have banned the use of the Y word on our Facebook page. We listened to Jewish fans of both Arsenal and Tottenham and agreed that the word should no longer be part of a football fans vocabulary in the 21st Century.

We are now just waiting for Tottenham fans to catch up and stop chanting the pejorative term, and it is crazy that all Sky do is “turn the mics down” everytime the Spurs fans sing their songs…

You also have songs that were never appropriate to sing, including some sang by our own fans over the decades about Spurs fans. On the whole, thesehave been consigned to history, especially since the arrival of camera phones. But other clubs still sing many songs that are vile.

You get Manchester United fans singing grotesque songs about Hillsborough, and in response, Liverpool fans (as well as Leeds fans), singing about the Munich air disaster. No fan or player should go to a game and not come home. And songs about disasters should not go down on banter.

Liverpool and Manchester United really do need to do more about the victim chanting their fans aim against each other.

Maybe instead of finger pointing at eachother, they should work harder to remove those fans that sing about Hillsborough in the Stretford End, or do airplane motions in the Kop End. Visiting fans from either club will try and deny these happen, and this is part of the problem.

You then also get Liverpool fans always singing what is now considered a homophobic chant towards Chelsea fans everytime they go to Stamford Bridge.

Personally, I have no issue with the rent boy song, and feel this goes down as a bit of banter. It is not homphobic and reportedly goes back to 1980s after a tabloid newspaper reports alleged a member of the Chelsea Headhunters,had been found in bed with a male sex worker during a police raid.

My view is that it was sung because Chelsea was known to be the area where a lot of MP’s rented, and visiting dignitaries stayed when in London during the 80s and 90s, and whilst alone, would hire in local teenage male sex workers, piling them with drugs before having their wicked way with them.

And let’s not start about the vile songs that Celtic (and to a lesser extent Liverpool) fans sing…they will celebrate any death just because of their political party. Real odd behaviour.

Singing about feeding Scousers and Chelsea rent-boys do, for me, just go into the “terrace banter” bucket. Just like when fans single out a fat lad “who is the fatty in the pink” or see someone wearing an orange Stone Island and then spend the next hour hour singing satsuuuuuuuma at them. The snowflake generation will say this is bullying. But it is terrace life and tame.

The Scousers are on the end of many specific chants aimed at them, but they give as good as they get and their behaviour leaves them open to being mocked. Feed the Scousers, Sign On, and my personal favourite, In your Liverpool slums.

In your Liverpool slums,
You look in the dustbin for something to eat,
You find a dead rat and you think it’s a treat,
In your Liverpool slums.

We now live in a world where people go out of their way to be offended. Fans who 10-years ago who never had an issue with a song, and sung worse themself, now faking outrage. Liverpool fans certainly fall into this category these days (again, they are happy to give it out). Jamie Carragher the perfect example.

Carragher has jumped on the bandwagon, bashing fans for singing Feed the Scousers.

This is the same Carragher that was once sent off for throwing a coin into the Highbury crowd. The same Carragher that spat on a 14-year-old girl.

I bet if I spat on Carragher on the way home from work, he would be demanding the Scousers find me, my place of work, etc and demand I be fired. Named and shamed. Yet Carra still has a job despite his vile actions.

Not once during the 90s, 00s or 10s did Carragher ever speak about Feed the Scousers. It was a non-issue for 30+ years. It is only now that it has become an issue. It is being offended for offended sake.

Now I get that povery and child hunger is a real thing. Although I do think it is overblown in this country (go travel to Cambodia, Brazil or India to see true child poverty). And whilst I get that some people do rely on food banks, my personal belief is that many of those who use them do so only because they exist, and not because they actually need to.

Students using food banks whilst going out in London twice a week. Those who use food banks as some sort of political statement so that they can say “I am a nurse on £28,407 per year but need to use a food bank”, just so that they can go on BBC and make a political statement.

I honestly think that if they closed 90% of the food banks in this country, child hunger would not increase. The majority of families would just re-prioritise their financials.

Those people that get their Frosties from a food bank to leave their money to buy fags or booze, Sky TV or all-inclusive holidays take advantage of the system.

For clarity, I grow up in poverty. I never went abroad until I was 11, and that was to a campsite in northern France. My family never had more than 4 (and later 5) channels on the TV. Never had a new car. All my clothes were my brothers. But we always had fresh food on the table cooked by my mum (parents learning to cook would have a huge impact on reducing food poverty, but thats a blog for another day!)

I digress and this is a football blog, not a blog that holds up a mirror to society.

Feed the Scousers. Nothing wrong with it. Stop being offended by everything. Stop trying to turn the terrace’s into the Albert Hall.

UTA.

Keenos

Revealed: The 64 teams that will participate in the inaugural European Super League

With Arsenal joining countless other teams across Europe in distancing themselves from the European Super League, we are now able to reveal the 64 teams that participate in the inaugural European Super League:

Richard Head, spokesman for A22 Sports Management commented: “We are delighted to announce such a stellar line-up for the inaugural European Super League.

“The 64 teams involved will forever be able to say that they were founding members of the greatest soccer tournament on earth. We can also announce that the final of the Star League will take place in the Cayman Islands, where the winners will be paid $200m“.

A22 have also announced the appointment of Joseph Barton as Head of Equality, Diversity & Inclusion.

In a brief statement, Joseph said: “This is going to be a proper tournament with men commentating on men, and women serving the teas.” The expectation is Barton will install himself as the tournaments chief pundit.

The first European Super League will commence in the 2024/25 season.

SheWore
Note: If you have not worked it out, this a satirical piece. Have a great Christmas.

8pm Saturday kick offs show Premier League are no better than European Super League proposers

Morning!

Nearly time for Christmas! Last day at work for most of us. Hats off to all those who will be working over the next 7-days – your retail and hospitality workers, delivery drivers, etc. These unsung heroes do not get the credit they deserve whilst we are all sitting enjoying a few days or weeks off.

Yesterday there were two bits of news that sort of connect – February TV games announced and the new European Super League proposal.

Three of our February Premier League fixtures have been moved:

  • Liverpool at home will now Sunday, 4 February , 4.30pm kick-off.
  • West Ham United away has been moved to a Sunday, 11 February, kicking off at 2pm.
  • Lastly, Newcastle United at the Emirates will be at 8pm on Saturday, 24 February 24.

Now from an Arsenal fans point of view, I am relieved ,sort of.

The long away trip to Burnley remains at 3pm and West Ham at 2pm on a Sunday is decent. The Newcastle game is the only one at an awkward kick off time – but it is a lot worse for Newcastle fans.

And that is my main issue. Kick off times affect all traveling fans – both those traveling from Newcastle and those Arsenal fans that commute in. 8pm on a Saturday is just designed for greed to maximise overseas TV revenue. The 8pm kick off is basically to satisfy our little cousins across the pond.

The last train back for Newcastle fans from London is at 21:00 – just as the second half is kicking off. There is a slightly later (and much longer) train that leaves London at 22:05 and involves a change. This will get them back to Newcastle at 3:20; and they would need to leave at half time to get to Kings Cross in time.

All the bluster from Sky Sports, BT (now TNT) and the Premier League about how they were “standing up for match going fans” back in 2021 when the European Super League last reared its ugly head was just posturing. Neville, Carragher, et al have always turned a blind eye to how match going fans are treated by the company they work for (and yes, I know this game is on TNT. Sky would have a 10pm kick off if they were allowed).

The TV companies do not care about match going fans. They only care about profits.

It will be interesting to see their response to the latest European Super League proposals – also announced yesterday.

My bet is they come out and say “fans have already made it clear that they do not want the European Super League”, ignoring the fact that we have also all made it clear previously that we do not want games with no trains home.

The revamped Super League is as posterous as the one proposed back in 2021.

The investment group behind it have this time attempted to make it seem “more inclusive” by having “promotion and relegation” and including a women’s competition.

The promotion and relegation aspect makes it appear that it will create a “fair opportunity” for teams to qualify, with 20 teams in the “Blue League” (the bottom of pyramid) getting relegated. But this is not the case.

Just 2 out of 16 teams in the “Star League” get relegated to the “Gold League”, and only 2 teams from that leafgue drop down into the bottom Blue League.

So whilst with the Champions League, you could, in theory, have 32 different teams in it each year, you can only have 2 different teams in the Star League from the previous year. It is clearly a ploy to protect the interests of those in the Star League by protecting them with a very low chance of relegation. The turnover of teams will be at the bottom end.

You will also only be promoted into the Blue League if a team from your domestic league gets relegated.

So Aston Villa this season could finish top 4. That will see them qualify for the Champions League. But finishing top 4 would not see them qualify for the European Super League unless an English team finishes in the bottom reaches of the Blue League, which will be highly unlikely.

The criticism of the previous European Super League was it was a closed shop. This incarnation allows others into the basement of the shop, but the big boys are still playing with each other upstairs.

A22 (the investment group behind the European Super League) have also tried to bribe fans by saying “fans would also be able to watch live matches for free on a new digital streaming platform.”

Most fans will see through this and know it will be temporary until they have “bought the market”. It is basically like the “one-year free trail” The Athletic gave out (and many other companies), and then once they decide the free period is over the prices are hiked up.

And even if it was free for life, I would not want it. And it just highlights again that the European Super League is for the TV fans, not the match going fans.

A simply solution for the Premier League, FA, UEFA and FIFA is to make it very clear:

  1. Clubs – If you enter the European Super League, you are excluded from all domestic, UEFA and FIFA competitions.
  2. Players – If you play for a team in the European Super League, you are banned from representing your country.

This will throw the European Super League into chaos as they are trying to “work with domestic leagues” by having promotion and relegation from domestic leagues. If those teams involved no longer play in domestic competition, it will get stale quickly.

At the time of writing, teams are already distancing themselves from the European Super League – Manchester United and Atletico Madrid the two biggest, as well as the Bundesliga as a collective.

Considering PSG refused to get involved in the last version, and English teams would likely be unable to participate under if new legislation is passed in 2024, the potential available particpating teams is quickly shrinking.

Real Madrid and Barcelona will allows push for it. The pair have overspent their way to glory in the last 30 years and are now paying for it. They are both poorly run clubs who in the past have relied on “state aid” to balance their books.

Juventus are another team who are pushing for the European Super League. Juventus were considered to be the leading club in the 2006 Serie A match fixing scandal, alongside AC Milan (another Italian club pushing for the formation of the Super League).

Real Madrid, Barcelona, Juventus and AC Milan all blame the Premier League for their huge debt. The reality is they all owe so much because their spending went unregulated and they backed that their countries will bail them out

(note: most of the Premier League sides debt in the table above is associated with stadium and training ground redevelopments, whilst the European sides is mainly money owed in transfers and due to overpaying wages for decades. Debt not secured against an asset.)

Decades of mismanagement and corruption is now catching up with a lot of teams on the continent. It is their fault they are all in such a bad financial situation, not the fault of the Premier League.

If Madrid, Juventus and Barcelona continue to push for the Super League, they will probably find themselves joined by Russian and Turkish teams, maybe Portuguese, as well as others from Eastern Europe. Will there really be any interest in 16 teams playing each other if it excludes English, French and German (I imagine the Dutch will also side with their fellow Central Europeans)? No.

Yes, the Champions League would suffer, but the domestic leagues would thrive in the absence of a top teams in Serie A and La Liga no longer playing each other. These leagues would very quickly die off.

The European Super League is clearly a bad idea. The only silver lining is it sounds like UEFA are scrapping their plans for a revamped Champions League.

My final thought is back in England, and a comment I made earlier.

Sky, TNT Sports, the Premier League do not stick up for match going fans. They only care for their own interests. And having Newcastle fans travel to London for an 8pm Saturday kick off highlights this!

Liverpool tomorrow….

Keenos