Arsenal’s left wing has been a bit of a headache for a few years.

I think we can all agree that whilst Gabriel Martinelli and Leandro Trossard are top players, they neither have the quality or consistency to be considered a top, top player. When you compare Bukayo Saka on the right and these on the left, the difference is huge.

In Saka’s worst season (and last season he was poor), he still outperforms both Trossard and Martinelli. To put simply, Saka’s floor is Martinelli and Trossard’s ceiling.

For some years, “a new left winger” has been at the top, or near the top, of Arsenal’s wish list. But the issue has always arisen when the discussion turns to “who?”.

The likes of Rafael Leao, Nico Williams and Rodrygo were on many a fans lips for some time. But neither has really kicked on from being hyped up youngsters and fulfilled their potential. Likewise, I am glad that we did not get tempted to get involved in the Anthony Gordon transfer race. Barcelona can have him for £70million.

Khvicha Kvaratskhelia is the best left winger in world football right now. Some fans had it in their head that he was obtainable. Earning in excess of £300k a week, playing for the back-to-back European champions, there is simple no reason why he would leave PSG.

For me there are only two other truly world class left wingers alongside Kvaratskhelia. Vinicius Junior and Raphina. One starts for Real Madrid and the other Barcelona. So that sort of rules them out unless something drastic changes (Vini has a falling out or Barca’s financial crisis deepens).

You then have a big load of players in the grouping behind the “big 2”. Senior professionals like Jeremy Doku and Luis Diaz were never going to be targets, and in reality, alongside the likes of Rodrygo, Leao and Williams, they have shown time and again that they are not players who consistently perform at the highest level.

That leaves you with the “next generation” of left wingers. Yan Diomande, Kenan Yildiz, Bradley Barcola, Mika Godts, Said El Mala and Assane Diao.

Recently, I blogged that Arsenal solve their left wing problem by looking at signing someone who could become a future superstar, and not by trining to recruit someone who is currently a superstar. And it feels like we are going to do just that.

Speculation around Morgan Rogers continues to intensify, and it feels like the club has decided that he will be our solution on the left wing.

Firstly, I do have my reservations around Rogers – it all feels too similar to Eberechi Eze.

Yes, Rogers is Premier League proven. He is aggressive, attacking, happy to shoot from distance and take on his opponent. But, like Eze, his best games come more centrally and he has not yet shown consistency over the course of the season.

Rogers turns 24 in July, which would make him 3 years younger than Eze when we signed him. That would give me hope that he still has room to grow whereas Eze was very much the finished article. Rogers is also harder working than Eze and more tactically aware. I feel he might be able to transition better into an inside winger in comparison to Eze. That is a good sign.

So if Rogers comes in, who goes out?

For me, it has to be Leandro Trossard.

Martinelli and Trossard offer two very different styles of plays – Martinelli is super quick, direct and tends to look to beat his man on the outside and keep chalk on his boots. Trossard, meanwhile, prefers picking up pockets of space inside, joining in build up play and looking to get shots off from distance.

Rogers would be a Trossard replacement, not a Martinelli one. That would basically leave us replacing a 31-year-old with a 24-year-old. I am happy with that.

But what for Martinelli?

I have seen arguments made that we need to replace Trossard and Martinelli. But who do we replace Martinelli with?

The likes of Barcola, Gordon (who is Barca bound) and many others who have the same traits as Martinelli also have the same deficiencies – bundles of pace, struggle against low block, not brilliant output. So why sell Martinelli for someone who is about the same level? It is all emperors new clothes.

Others on my watch list, the likes of Kenan Yildiz and Mika Godts, are all more like Trossard or Rogers style wingers than Martinelli. I think we need to ensure we mimic the “one who has raw pace, one who can offer control” that we currently have. And I believe this is what Mikel Arteta wants as well when you look at how he has built the right hand side – Saka with his control, Noni Madueke with his raw pace and chaos.

If Rogers comes in, it rules out many of those who offer the control but not the pace.

I would be happy with Rogers coming in for Trossard to be our first choice winger, and Martinelli being 2nd choice. For a season at least.

Arsenal are also being heavily linked with 16-year-old Jeremy Monga.

Now I have not seen much of him, but despite being the same age as Max Dowman, he has already made 7 appearances in the Premier League and a further 27 in the Championship, 19 of which came off the bench.

I would be a liar if I pretended to have ever seen Monga play. And lets be honest most of the online scouts out there have not seen him live. I have seen a few clips that have circulated online and checked out scouting reports from bloggers that I respect. It all points to someone who is a very exciting 16-year-old and could become a breakout star. But there is a long way to go (as there is with Dowman).

Monga looks big and strong for his age, and combines explosive pace, exceptional dribbling, close control at high speed, and unpredictability. Two-footed, Monga could become that unicorn winger, who offers both the pace on the outside, and technical ability to come inside. But he is a long way from being close to Premier League ready. And this is where Martinelli comes in.

You go into next season with your upgrade on Trossard in Rogers, and Gabriel Martinelli as his compeition. A number of scenarios could happen:

1. Rogers becomes a superstar. One of the best left wingers in the world. You are then happy Martinelli as his back up and we do nothing, allowing Monga to continue his development and replace Martinelli in 2028.
2. Rogers struggles to take his game to the next level and Martinelli continues at the same level. You then look into signing a speedster such as Barcola to replace Martinelli, or go in for Kvaratskhelia, who may be wanting a new challenge after 2 and a half years of winning everything for PSG.
3. Martinelli kicks on again and takes his game to the next level. It then does not matter if Rogers has become a superstar or not. We either have two superstar wingers, or Rogers playing second fiddle to Martinelli.
4. Jeremy Monga has a sensational loan move (I am sure he will spend 2026/27 on loan to a Championship club or abroad), and he replaces Martinelli (if he has failed to up his game).

Either way, I think it is likely that the club will go into next season with one of Trossard or Martinelli. We will not replace both. That will give someone such as Rogers (or Barcola if he replaces Martinelli) a season to show that they are the man to be Arsenal’s left winger for the next 5-years. And in the meantime we will be quietly developing Monga into a player that could become a generational winger.

This summer is about evolution, not revolution.

Keenos

Arsenal should seriously consider signing Bruno Fernandes. I never thought I would write that.

The Manchester United captain’s contract is set to expire in 12 months, and there is plenty of talk that he could look to leave this summer. He is a man that Mikel Arteta and his team should be looking at.

At 31, Fernandes is in the form of his life. And as someone who has never relied on his physical attributes, you can not see any quick decline in his future.

When fans talk about replacing Martin Odegaard (who I do think is underrated), they often talk about the Mesut Ozil style number 10s. But Arsenal do not play a system with an out and out number 10. Odegaard contributes much more than trying the magic ball pass. He dictates play, drops deep, presses high. Any replacement would need to be able to replicate what Odegaard does, but with added creativity.

Fernandes boffers exactly the kind of elite creativity, leadership, and winning mentality that could transform Mikel Arteta’s champions to another level. He is a a game changer, which often Odegaard is not.

One of Arsenal’s biggest issues in recent seasons has been breaking down deep defensive blocks in crucial matches. Teams often sit back against Arsenal because they know Arteta’s side dominates possession. We can come predictable at times, and lack invention when opponents crowd central areas and force the ball wide. Bruno Fernandes would immediately solve part of that problem because he is one of the most inventive midfielders in world football.

Fernandes’s ability to play defence-splitting passes, create chances from nothing, and take risks in possession would add another layer to Arsenal’s attack. But at the same time he is also a consistent player who does not only look to play that magic ball every time. And he is more than happy dropping deep to help out.

The Portuguese midfield consistently ranks among Europe’s leaders for chances created, key passes, and assists. What separates him from many attacking midfielders is his willingness to attempt difficult passes repeatedly, even after losing possession. Arsenal sometimes suffer from overthinking in the final third, recycling the ball instead of making aggressive attacking decisions. Bruno’s mentality is the opposite. He constantly looks forward, searching for the killer pass first before reverting if it is not on.

Another reason Arsenal should pursue Fernandes is his leadership.

Arsenal have matured significantly under Arteta, but there are still occasions when they lack emotional control in difficult moments. Bruno Fernandes, despite criticism for his passionate behaviour, is undeniably a fighter. He demands intensity from teammates and refuses to accept poor standards.

Championship-winning teams need strong personalities who can drag the side through tense periods of a season. Fernandes has captained one of the biggest clubs in the world and handled enormous pressure every week. That experience would be invaluable in Arsenal’s dressing room, especially during title races and Champions League knockout ties.

His versatility would also make Arsenal tactically stronger. Fernandes can operate as a traditional number ten, an advanced number eight, or even drift wide to overload areas.

Arteta values flexible players who can rotate positions during matches, and Fernandes fits that philosophy perfectly. Imagine Arsenal lining up with Martin Zubimendi anchoring midfield, with Declan Rice and Bruno Fernandes play ahead of him. Opponents would struggle to track movement, passing combinations, and late runs into the box. Arsenal’s attack could become one of the most unpredictable in Europe.

Importantly, Fernandes also brings goals from midfield.

Arsenal have improved offensively, but much of our scoring burden still falls on Saka and the centre-forward options. Fernandes regularly contributes double figures in goals and assists across all competitions. He is excellent from penalties, dangerous from long range, and intelligent with late arrivals into scoring positions. Those extra goals could make the difference in tight title races where margins are incredibly small.

There is also a psychological dimension to such a signing. Arsenal competing for a player of Bruno Fernandes’ stature would send a powerful message to the rest of the Premier League.

For years, rivals questioned whether Arsenal could attract established world-class players in their prime. Signing Fernandes would demonstrate ambition and prove the club is fully focused on winning major trophies immediately rather than simply developing young talent.

Critics might argue that Fernandes occasionally gives the ball away too often or takes unnecessary risks. However, that risk-taking is precisely what elite attacking football requires. The best creative players in history lose possession because they attempt ambitious actions others would never even see.

Arsenal already have structure and discipline under Arteta; what they sometimes need is unpredictability. Fernandes offers controlled chaos — the type of player capable of producing one moment that changes an entire season.

Age should not be viewed as a major concern either. Fernandes remains physically outstanding, rarely misses matches, and maintains elite fitness levels. Modern footballers regularly perform at the highest level well into their thirties, especially intelligent midfielders who rely more on vision and technique than explosive pace. Arsenal’s young core could benefit enormously from learning alongside an experienced professional with Bruno’s standards and mentality.

Finally, Fernandes possesses the mentality Arsenal need to conquer Europe.

The Champions League demands players who embrace pressure rather than fear it. Fernandes has played countless high-stakes matches for club and country. He thrives in emotional environments and never hides when responsibility arrives. Those characteristics are essential for teams hoping to win major honours.

Bruno Fernandes would be a perfect signing for Arsenal because he combines creativity, leadership, experience, versatility, and elite production in one package. He would elevate Arsenal technically and mentally while adding the ruthless edge often required to win more titles. He would be the perfect addition to Arsenal’s midfield.

DK

In his own words, Kylian Mbappe is 4th choice striker at Real Madrid.

Having been left out of the starting line-up for their 2-0 win over Real Oviedo, the Frenchman was whistled by his own fans as he came off the bench and entered the Bernabeu pitch in the 69th minute yesterday. A petition calling for ‘Mbappe Out’ has attracted tens of millions of signatures.

In an interview following the match, Mbappe said “I haven’t played because for the coach I’ve been the fourth striker in the squad behind Mastantuono, Vini and Gonzalo.”

There is an outside chance that Mbappe may look to leave the Spanish capital this summer, and that has got some Arsenal fans dreaming. But should we be targeting a man that we nearly signed close to a decade ago?

Argument for

There is no doubt that Kylian Mbappe truly unstoppable world-class superstar.

Having made enormous progress under Mikel Arteta, Mbappe would instantly elevate our starting XI and take us from scrappy contenders to genuine favourites. He would take us to that next level.

Mbappe is a once-in-a-generation talent capable of deciding matches on his own through pace, finishing, movement, and creativity. He would provide the sort of individual excellence that our front line lacks. Simply put, Mbappe guarantees goals at the highest level.

Tactically, Mbappe would fit perfectly into Arteta’s attacking system. His versatility allows him to play on the left wing, through the middle, or alongside another striker. Imagine defenders trying to contain a front line featuring Saka on one side and Mbappe on the other, with Victor Gyokeres or Kai Havertz in the middle. Opponents would not know which way the attack is coming from.

Another key factor is commercial impact. Arsenal are already one of the biggest clubs in world football, but signing Mbappé would elevate their global profile even further. Shirt sales, sponsorship deals, and international attention would increase dramatically. Young fans across the world idolise Mbappé because of his exciting playing style and superstar image. Bringing him to North London would strengthen Arsenal’s brand and make the club even more attractive to future elite players.

Perhaps most importantly, signing Mbappé would send a statement to the football world.

For years, Arsenal were criticised for lacking ambition in the transfer market compared to Europe’s financial giants. Acquiring a player of Mbappé’s stature would prove that Arsenal are no longer outsiders hoping to compete — they are a destination for the very best.

Kylian Mbappé is not just a superstar player; he is the kind of footballer who changes the history of clubs. Arsenal should do everything possible to bring him to the Emirates Stadium.

Argument against

Although signing Kylian Mbappe may sound like a dream move for Arsenal supporters, the reality is that it could create more problems than solutions for the club.

Arsenal have spent years carefully rebuilding under Mikel Arteta, focusing on team chemistry, tactical discipline, and long-term development. Bringing in a global superstar like Mbappé could disrupt the balance that has made Arsenal successful in recent seasons.

Arsenal’s current success comes from unity rather than individual stardom, and changing that formula could be risky. Arteta has built a side based on pressing, teamwork, tactical intelligence, and collective responsibility. Every player contributes defensively and works hard off the ball. Mbappe, despite his incredible talent, has often been criticised for limited defensive effort and for wanting a system built around him, and that creates another problem.

Many fans will see Mbappe as the solution to the clubs left wing problems. But Mbappe wants to be front a centre.

Before joining Real Madrid, Mbappe reportedly sought confirmation that he would be played as the teams main striker. It is unlikely his view has changed in that matter, and that he will be happy moving down a level to Arsenal, and being pushed out to the wings.

Anotherbig concern is financial.

Mbappe is one of the highest-paid footballers in the world, demanding enormous wages, bonuses, and image-rights agreements. Arsenal have worked hard to build a sustainable squad structure, rewarding players based on collective growth rather than superstar status. If Mbappe arrived on significantly higher wages than players like Bukayo Saka, Martin Odegaard, or Declan Rice, it could create tension inside the dressing room. Football history shows that wage imbalance often damages squad harmony, even at elite clubs.

Considering these financial implications and that Mbappe would unlikely be happy on that left wing, istead of investing hundreds of millions into one superstar, Arsenal should strengthen multiple positions and improve overall squad depth. Spending massive resources on one player could weaken the club’s ability to strengthen elsewhere.

There is also immense pressure that comes with signing a player of Mbappe’s profile. Expectations would become unrealistic overnight. Fans and media would expect immediate Champions League trophies and Premier League titles. If results failed to match the hype, the atmosphere around the club could quickly become toxic. Arsenal’s current project has thrived partly because of patience and gradual improvement, not because of desperation for instant success.

Finally, Arsenal should remember that football is a team game. History proves that balanced squads often outperform teams built around one superstar. Clubs such as Manchester City and Liverpool F.C. achieved sustained success through structure, chemistry, and depth rather than relying on a single global icon.

Kylian Mbappe is undoubtedly one of the best players in the world, but not every great player is the right fit for every club. Arsenal’s future may be brighter if they continue trusting the collective vision that has already brought them back among Europe’s elite.

DK