Tag Archives: She Wore

One mans fight against THE Arsenal’s heritage being trampled over

It does not take much for me to get riled, but Arsenal’s heritage is currently being trampled over by the players and management of the football club.

I am talking about the move away from the tradition that the captain picks the shirt length, and every other player follows suit.

Over the last year or so, we have seen more and more players not follow the great condition and wear different length sleeves. Mathieu Flamini last season actually cut the length of his sleeves down using medical scissors.

If frustrated me to the point that I wanted to find out why the club had become so lax on the issue, and moved away from the tradition.

Having made numerous phone calls, and been passed around like a bad pass the parcel, I was finally contacted by Tom Bennett of the Arsenal press office. I have also been in touch with Hazel Wright. Both have been polite and courteous, but both continually told me that the decisions are not theirs, and they could not put me in touch with anyone who could make a decision on the matter.

Recently, Tom Bennett called and gave me the usual “Our traditions are important” guff. He the trotted out the absurd “Our players are respecting the tradition by wearing short-sleeved shirts when the Captain decides but the undershirt is long”. When for the thousandth time I said “Why not have short-sleeved undershirts available for those occasions? They must be available Giroud wore one in the Cup Final.” He offered no reply.

On the separate issue of Theo Walcott – He said “He rolls up his sleeves” (Does Mr. Bennett watch matches?).

Walcott USED to roll up his sleeves, both now I have been told by Hazel Wright that Vic Akers  pins up his sleeves for him (Poor Diddums) – only Mustafi rolls up his sleeves.

I then said “A referee would not allow any player on the field wearing pins or any sharp object”. Again no reply to that.

My opinion is that Walcott has skipped that process and simply wears a short-sleeved shirt all season. When I put this across to Tom Bennett, I once again got no reply to that.

I also pointed out that originally Alexis Sanchez, Mesut Ozil & Hector Bellerin wore the  long-sleeved performance enhancing garments (PEGs), but only Ozil continued to do so for most of the season, even in warmish weather. If the rest of the team could show respect then why not Mr. Ozil? Perhaps the Club have given him Carte Blanche in order to retain his services? No reply to that.

Mr Bennett said he would speak to the “right people” (what does that mean?). I requested he take this further, especially with Ken Friar. He then said he could not promise that they would reply to him or that he would get back to me.

I pointed out that I was speaking not just for myself but for many others who respect our traditions and to make that very clear to the “right people”. I also stated that maybe they should stop marketing the History-Class-Tradition stuff until this is resolved (which would be easy.) All  this has taken him aback, he thought his “They are wearing long-sleeved undershirts, thank you for your support.” first reply would be the end of the matter.

I think the Club have already capitulated and hoped no-one would notice, if that is the case may they all hang their heads in shame. I hear the sound of Chapman turning in his grave.

Some of you reading this will think stop moaning but if we do not stand up and protect the traditions of this club, no matter how small, where does that leave us? We are THE Arsenal. The grandest club in the game. Disregarding our traditions would make us no different to the likes of Chelsea and Manchester City.

I will continue the good fight. But I am just one man and can only do so much. If anyone else what’s to get involved in putting the pressure on the club to respect our traditions, please get in touch and I will pass on the relevant contact details that I have been using.

Mr. O’Connell

Thomas Lemar v Theo Walcott

So dropping into our email inbox this week were some infographics from our friends at KickOff which really were interesting (if you are into that sort of thing:

Whilst be no means are we trying to make the case that Theo Walcott is better than Thomas Lemar, it supports the view that Walcott is overly criticise for the way he plays, his style, his technique, yet his end product is actually very good.

The infographics kept coming, with how Monaco performed with and without Thomas Lemar:

I am always sceptical about with and without statistics, as often the without statistics do not contain enough data to make a true assessment.

Most interesting for me is the top line. Lemar only missed 4 games last season. If we do sign him, we are getting a fit, health player capable of playing 30+ league games.

One thing is for sure, every year Lemar has improved as a player. Whilst he might not yet be as good as Alexis Sanchez, the signs are good, and as long as he continues to improve every year, he will be a world class player within a couple of years.

Keenos

Jack Wilshere: “Bad deal better than no deal”

Reports are circulating that Jack Wilshere could be set to leave Arsenal for as little as £9m, with Italian side Sampdoria the interested party.

In the current market place, when the likes of Kyle Walker is going for £50m and Arsenal look set to spend £45m on Lemar, £9m for Jack Wilshere seems a bad a deal.

With a year left on his contract, should Arsenal follow the Jeremy Corbyn mantra of a bad deal being better than no deal, or follow Theresa May who is happy to take no deal rather than a bad deal

Wilshere’s contract is set to expire in 12 months time. This leaves Arsenal with three obvious options:

1. Sell him this summer
2. Keep him and release on a free in 2018
3. Offer him a new contract to stay

Working backwards, we will start with point 3. Offering Jack Wilshere a new contract.

There has never been doubting Wilshere’s talent. England’s most naturally gifted midfielder since Gazza. But he is now 25 and has never fulfilled the potential he showed all them years ago as a teenager against Barcelona.

Wilshere has been hit by a horrendous run of injuries.

Since his breakthrough season in 2010/11, when he played 35 league games, his league appearances record reads:

2011/12: 0 league games
2012/13: 25
2013/14: 24
2014/15: 14
2015/16: 3
2016/17: 29

Last season he went on loan to Bournemouth in an attempt to prove that, in less intensive conditions, he could stay fit. He ended up breaking down mid-April.

There is no doubting Wilshere, when fit, is a wonderful player. But he is simply not a player Arsenal can rely on. With up to 60 games next year, Arsenal need players capable of playing in every single one of them.

When you look at the last 3 Premier League Champions, Chelsea, Leicester and Chelsea (again) they all had one thing in common – they played the same starting XI for most of the season.

Wilshere go’s in the same box as the likes of Jamie Redknapp and Darren Anderton. Talented midfielders who just could not stay fit.

Arsenal would be crazy to offer him a new contract.

I see some people saying “give him a one year deal, pay as he plays”. Get your heads in the real world lads. Why would he sign this is he has a 4 year deal on decent money being offered elsewhere?

Wilshere is currently coming to an end of a £90,000 a week contract. Even if we encourage him to take a 20% pay cut, that is still £72,000 a week. Over a new 4 year contract that is £15m.

I have always found it interesting that many of those who slated Arsene Wenger and the board for giving Abou Diaby his last contract at 25 are demanding Wilshere get one. Hypocrites.

To tie up £15m over 4 years in a player who has averaged 17 league games a season over the last 4 season is bad business.

Giving Jack a new deal is something that should simply not be considered.

We then come to the “no deal better than a bad deal”.

There is a school of though that maybe, like some argue with Alexis Sanchez and Mesut Ozil, Arsenal should roll the ride, take the risk, let his contract run down to have him one more season.

For starters he is no where near the ability as the aforementioned. He doesn’t even get into our strongest 11.

Secondly, letting Jack Wilshere’s contract run down would actually cost the club £14m as we would miss out on any potential transfer fee, and have to pay out £5m in wages to Wilshere.

Over the next 12 months, that money can be put to better use elsewhere. Like going into the pockets of Ozil and Sanchez, or offsetting the majority of the salary demands for Lemar – a player with a great injury record.

With Wilshere not fully fit, there is no guarantee how many games he would play next season.

Arsenal could end up giving him one more year and him not actually playing.

Letting Wilshere’s contract run down would be another case of us making a player very rich without him actually contributing much.

The final option is selling him – no matter if it is a bad deal for Arsenal.

The immediate impact of selling Wilshere is it frees up wages. Close to £5m. Add on any transfer fee we might get for him, Arsenal would be looking to make just shy of £15m by selling him. This is money that could be used elsewhere, as already explained.

Arsenal could try and protect themselves but adding a buyback clause to his contract, ensuring that if he has a good, fit 2 years, Arsenal could get him back in.

Wilshere is a player who now offers nothing to Arsenal. When fit, he does not start. When injured, he does not start. Arsenal would be best off shot of him, and use whatever comes in to invest in someone new.

Jack Wilshere might be one of our own, and often you hear fans talk using their heart rather than their head when it comes to him, but this summer he needs to be sold on. A

Even if it means Arsenal accepting a bad deal.

Keenos