“Superpower” Tottenham are the Newcastle of the South

We wake this morning to headlines revealing “the secrets behind Pochettino’s success” and how Spurs are a “Premier League Superpower”. I spat my coffee out.

What success is this exactly?

This is Mauricio Pochettino’s 5th season with Tottenham. He has yet to win a trophy.

In the 4 completed seasons, he has finished above The Arsenal twice, and only finished top 4 75% of the time.

Let’s roll our minds back to the Arsenal trophy drought 2006-2012. An 8 season period of failure when Arsene Wenger failed to lead the club to a single trophy.

During that 8 year period, Wenger led Arsenal into the Champions League 100% of the time. The side finished above Spurs 8 out of 8 times and he led the team to a Champions League final and 2 League Cup finals. He was labelled a failure for doing so.

What Wenger “achieved” during that 8 year period, when Arsenal were paying off heavy stadium debt, was superior to what Pochettino has achieved in his 4 completed seasons at Spurs.

This year will make it 5 seasons in a row without a trophy. It could also see Tottenham finish outside the top 4 for the 2nd time in his short reign (Wenger was at the helm for 22 years and finished outside the top 4 just twice).

Tottenham may well end up finishing behind Arsenal for the 3rd time in Pochettino’s 5 seasons.

Reading a book explaining Pochettino’s success would be akin to reading a self-help book from Theresa May on how to unite your colleagues behind you. It would not contain anything useful.

The reality is the media are writing about Pochettino’s success even though he is achieving less than Wenger’s failure.

I have said for a while, Arsenal at their worst this century achieved more than Tottenham at their best.

As for the “superclub” comment, well that is just laughable.

The new stadium in Tottenham is an architectural masterpiece. The most technological advanced stadium in Europe. But that should be a given.

It is the most expensive stadium ever built in England, and the newest stadium. You would be a bit disappointed if it was not the best, most advanced stadium in history. Especially for £1bn.

The media have tried to compare it to Arsenal’s Emirates stadium. Spurs fans have “boasted” about how the new Tottenham stadium is superior. Of course it is superior. It is new.

Arsenal’s stadium is 13 years old. The technology that is around now was not around in 2006.

In 2006 the iPhone did not exist. The best-selling phone was the Nokia 1660. It still had snake and cost £30.

“The Nokia 1600 mobile has a speaking clock, which was a novel feature when the phone was launched in 2005. A user could use the speaking clock by pressing the asterisk (“*”) button during the display of the home screen.

The phone also includes a ringtone composer which allows creating custom ringtones. Pre-composed ringtones can be transferred through a data cable.

The phone has a basic calculator which can perform only addition, subtraction, multiplication and division.

There are 14 pre-defined themes with 14 wallpapers and menu backgrounds.

The menu features animated icons.”

In 2018 the best selling phone is the Samsung Galaxy Note 9, at a cost of £799.

Look at your car.

In 2006, things like SatNav and air con did not come as standard. Bluetooth A CD player and FM/AM radio was your entertainment system. In 2019, every car comes with SatNav, climate control, digital radio, bluetooth enabled and more. Technology has moved on.

In summary, you would feel short-changed if you spent big on a new mobile phone or car and it was not vastly superior to a car or phone from 2006.

It is a fantastic stadium, but that counts for nothing if you fail to win trophies.

Tottenham are no more a superclub than Newcastle under Kevin Keegan.

Keegan led Newcastle to a 2nd place twice, and three top 4 finishes in four years. Compare that to 3 top 4 finishes for Pochettino, finishing 2nd just the once.

Newcastle also reached two FA Cup finals, losing both.

In the end Keegan left having failed to win Newcastle a trophy, despite playing in-front of over 50,000 every week.

Were Newcastle a “Superclub” in the 90s? Or did they just have a couple of years where they finished high up the league, won nothing, played in-front of huge crowds and failed to break their league title drought which was well over half-century.

Tottenham have finished high up the league, won nothing, played in-front of huge crowds and failed to break their league title drought which is well over half-century.

Leeds under David O’Leary were cut from the same cloth.

They finished top 4 three times in a row, made a Champions League semi-final. But like Newcastle, it was temporary and they soon found themselves relegated.

Tottenham can not be talked about in the same bracket as Manchester United, Liverpool, Arsenal or Chelsea. These clubs have all won trophies in the last 5 years. Tottenham have not.

They might have a shiny new stadium with all the mod-cons that the newest, most expensive stadium built in England should have, but that means nothing if they do not win trophies.

Tottenham are merely Newcastle of the South. They think they are a big club but do not have the recent silverware to back it up.

Keenos

Advertisements

5 thoughts on ““Superpower” Tottenham are the Newcastle of the South

      1. TheMadGooner

        This page used to be about Arsenal, now most of it’s articles are related to bashing other teams. Is this the level we have gotten to? How about getting better at ‘writing’ rather than getting views through stupid articles. This is a page for Arsenal fans and Arsenal, it posts literally everything but that.

      2. keenosafc Post author

        Every article is to do with Arsenal.

        1,500+ articles written, less than 10% contain the word “Tottenham”

        If you do not think articles about Crystal Palace and Arsenal walking for mental health, fans being ripped off by Napoli, Reiess Nelson, Arsenal transfer targets, discussion about the next Arsenal director, David Ospina or talk about fans being banned for pitch invading are not relevant, maybe you should read another blog

        Plenty out there which just “copy and paste” news and quotes

        1,500+ articles written. Less than 10% contain the word “Tottenham”

  1. paul35mm

    It is both accurate and a little unfair to compare Tottenham of today with Newcastle teams of the ’90s. The Premier League, and indeed global football, have changed since then in four important ways.

    1. The Age of the Oligarch and state ownership of clubs means that it is more difficult than ever to break into the top 4 and stay there, Manchester City are the marketing arm of a nation and an airline, which means unlimited funds for improvement, regardless of on-field success. Chelsea’s over football revenue investments are beyond the means of most clubs. Manchester United’s global brand means virtually unlimited money.

    That means that, for most years, there is one top 4 slot available to the rest of the league. Arsenal finally lost out after 21 straight years in the top four, with Arsene Wenger punished for not continuing to achieve the impossible. Tottenham have come close, to trophies but so have Liverpool and neither have won the league in the Premier League era. Only four teams, Arsenal Man U, Man City, and Chelsea have won the league more than once in the Premier League era. Tottenham won’t join them, probably ever. Leicester won the league on a fluke, but have struggled to make it into the top 10 and have flirted with relegation despite hundreds of millions in investment over football revenue. West Ham, Everton, and other have spent massively to claw their way into European competition, but none are able to get there and stay there. It just costs too much.

    2. The Champions League and the search for global revenue: THe advent of the Champions League has turned European competition from an extra-curricular activity into a must-have credential of excellence. The revenue that comes with participating is nice, but for the clubs with a real chance to win it, it’s not the money that matters, it’s their identity as a “top” club and the global sales of merchandise that go with it that really matters. Tottenham can get in but they can’t stay in. Even if they were to win the Champions League, as Liverpool did eons ago under Rafa Benitez, they won’t stay in long enough to develop their global bran and make the kind of money they need to compete for top players.

    3. The rise of Global Football – Until recently, the Premier League and a handful of the top European clubs were the only places a player could go and get really rich. That is no longer true. The massive infusion of cash into English football in particular means it costs more and more to bring first-team stars into clubs. Players like Jamie Vardy and Richarlison can make 100,000 or more a week at mid-table clubs. This does not hurt the financial giants like Man U, Man City, and Chelsea, who can spend whatever they need to spend. It does not hurt PSG, which is owned by a country, Real Madrid, or Barcelona who are protected by Spanish law, or Juventus; but it makes it harder for the Arsenals, Tottenhams, and Liverpools who are trying to run their clubs on the money they make in football.

    4. The decreased importance of attendance revenue – Playing in front of 50,000 people used to mean a club had the revenue from those fans to invest, while clubs without those attendance figures did not. That is no longer important. Tottenham’s new stadium will bring in new revenue, but that cash is peanuts compared to TV and global marketing money. Arsenal’s strategy to compete with United, City, and Chelsea was to build a new stadium; but the landscape changed before they could bring that revenue online to assist their cause. Tottenham’s new stadium will be a showpiece and it will add money to the coffers, but not enough to turn them into a ‘big club’.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to R Hursey Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.