Pundits change the narrative to push their anti-Arsenal agenda

We go to Liverpool, play defensively looking to hit our opponents on the counter, lose 1-nil to a freak free-kick and are heavily criticised for the way we approached the game.

Manchester City come to Arsenal, play defensively looking to hit us on the break, draw 1-1 and are praised for the way they approached the game.

Thousands are cancelling Sky Sports every week, and it is not just due to the cost. Their agenda driven pundits who change their viewpoint depending on who is playing has also created a fatigue in football analysis. At least from a mainstream stand point.

The likes of Gary Neville and Jamie Carragher flip flop on every issue depending on who they are talking about. And when it comes to The Arsenal they will always look to paint us in a negative light, and our opponents in a postive.

Last season they criticised Arsenal for drawing against Manchester City, having had less time to prepare for the game following a mid-week trip to Italy, and being down to 10-men for the entire half.

This season it is all praise for Manchester City for drawing away from home having had less rest, whilst having 11 men for the entire game and taking the lead so early on.

A Manchester City of 4 or 5 years ago would have built on their early goal. Instead, they sat back and looked to defend the lead. And they have been praised for doing so..

We all know negativity sells. And we all know that writing or talking about The Arsenal gets more hits (and therefore ad revenue) then any other club in the Premier League.

This morning, the Daily Mirror have led with the headline Ex-Arsenal striker in coma with brain injury after horrific head collision during match. It is a headline that will quickly rise to the top of NewsNow and get everyone clicking.

The player in question was former Arsenal youngster Billy Vigar, who left us last summer and joined Step 3 side Chichester City.

Yes, Vigar was in our youth set up, but for the Mirror to use this horrific incident and his connection with us to generate ad revenue is crass. They would not have written the story had he not been a former Arsenal academy lad. And this just highlights that it is all about associating Arsenal with any incident to generate those clicks.

Papers have a history of using “ex-Arsenal star” in their headlines to generate that review, just like they did when Jay Emmanuel Thomas was jailed over a £600,000 drug smuggling plot.

JET played 5 times for Arsenal in a career that saw him make 384 appearances, inlduing over 100 for Bristol City. “Ex-Bristol City star” just doesn’t generate that revenue though.

We also had the Ex-Arsenal striker jailed for ‘chilling’ behaviour towards scared ex-girlfriend. Once again our name being used to make money. This time it was Anthony Stokes who made one appearance for us. He played just the 191 times for Celtic. But playing for small clubs does not matter as it does not get the clicks.

This agenda really does turn you off. And it was why so many like myself no longer listen to TalkSport or read newspapers.

It is clear and obvious what these outlets are doing, but still some fans eat it up and use it to fuel their own hatred towards their club.

In the last 24-hours we have been criticised for daring to celebrate a 93rd minute equaliser, and not picking the ball up and running back to the half way line. For a start, this is untrue as Martin Zubimendi attempted to grab the ball, was wrestled to the floor by City before making his way back to the half way line.

“You would not get Man City to celebrate. Their players would have gone straight back to the halfway line” was the line being peddled by many. Yet we all remember the incident a year ago when John Stones scored. Erling Haaland had the ball in his hands and decided to throw it against Gabriel’s head rather than run it back. He was priased by many pundits for showing passion.

“Liverpool never celebrate draws, that is why they are winners.” Yet not so long ago Liverpool players, being encouraged by Jurgen Klopp, celebrated a 2-2 draw with West Brom like they had just won the league.

The celebration police have been around for a long time. I do not get the criticism of any team or their fans that decides to celebrate a goal. Especially one in the closing stages of a game where they have been dominating but could not get the breakthrough.

On Sunday, the entire stadium erupted when it went to 1-1. Every Arsenal fan in the ground celebrated. So it was disheartening to see, when scrolling through social media on my train journey home, some fans crtisicing us.

They are the fans that sit at home and watch on the tele, phone in hand ready to moan for e-likes (note: not every fan watching on TV is like this, it is a minority), they are the fan that at 80 minutes would have left the ground to return to the pub. Those sort of fans that do not support and back the team for the 90 minutes (plus whatever stoppage time there is).

When we equalised, you should have celebrated no matter where you were watching. If you instead decided to take to social media and moan that players and fans were celebrating, then you are the one with the problem. I do not think football is for you.

We had one clown on the Facebook page claim that the final whistle was met with boos from Arsenal fans. When it was pointed out that no one booed, his response was “well you must not have been at the game”. As the conversation continued, he claimed that “my mates in block 95 told me they booed”. Imagine lying on the internet to strangers.

And that is where we are now. So many people, fans and pundits, are driven by the endorphine hit of e-likes that they will peddle whatever crap they think of in an attempt to get that attention or that rise out of someone. We welcome all views on the Facebook page, but those that are clearly lying in an attempt to paint our club in a negative light are quickly dealt with and banned. I only wish Arsenal would do the same with certain journalists.

2nd in the league. Only Liverpool with their incredible 100% record ahead of us. 6 games played in all competitions, 4 wins, 12 goals and just 2 conceded. It baffles me how anyone can be sitting their moaning.

We go again tomorrow!

Keenos

MATCH REPORT: Arsenal 1 – 1 Manchester City

The Emirates witnessed a rollercoaster on Sunday as Arsenal snatched a late draw against Manchester City. It wasn’t always pretty, but it was dramatic, and Gabriel Martinelli’s stoppage-time lob meant Mikel Arteta’s side walked away with a point that felt both deserved and desperately needed.

City Strike Early

Arsenal actually started brightly, but it was City who landed the first blow. Just nine minutes in, Tijjani Reijnders drove straight through midfield and found Erling Haaland lurking in behind. One clean touch, one calm finish — and suddenly Arsenal were chasing the game.

What followed was a familiar story: Arsenal with the ball, City in their disciplined block, Pep Guardiola barking from the touchline as his side soaked up pressure. For the first 45 minutes, Arsenal huffed and puffed but couldn’t land a punch.

Arteta’s Changes Spark Life

At halftime, Arteta rolled the dice. Bukayo Saka and Eberechi Eze came on, and the difference was instant. Arsenal moved the ball quicker, stretched City wider, and forced Gianluigi Donnarumma into action more than once.

Still, time was slipping away. City were defending deeper and deeper, and for all of Arsenal’s possession, the equaliser felt like it might never come.

Martinelli’s Moment

Then came the 93rd minute. Eze picked his head up and clipped a gorgeous ball over the top. Martinelli, full of fresh energy after coming off the bench, was onto it in a flash. One touch, a delicate lob over Donnarumma – and the Emirates exploded.

It was the kind of goal that makes you forget the frustration of the previous 90 minutes. A moment of pure quality, right when Arsenal needed it most.

What We Learned

  • Arsenal: The mentality is there. Falling behind early against City can crush a team, but Arteta’s subs changed the dynamic. Martinelli and Eze showed exactly why squad depth matters. Still, Arsenal will be frustrated at their lack of cutting edge until stoppage time.
  • Manchester City: Rarely do we see a Pep team with just 33% possession, but City were set up to grind this out. For 92 minutes, it worked. Then one lapse undid all the hard work. Guardiola will take positives from the defensive performance, but Haaland’s goal aside, City offered little.

Final Thoughts

This wasn’t the free-flowing spectacle many expected, but it was a reminder that the tiniest moments decide these heavyweight clashes. Arsenal’s equaliser keeps the momentum alive in their title push; City, meanwhile, leave North London with the sense of a win that slipped through their fingers.

DJ

Greedy, greedy Fulham

Anyone that has ever been Fulham away will know it is always a good day out.

Not only is it an easy stadium to get to, surrounded by many decent pubs that are not “home fans only”, we have also got a huge away allocation (around 6,000 seats).

Fulham’s away end is split into two sections – the normal away end and a “neutral” end. The original plastic club, under Mohamed Al-Fayed they attempted to become a “day out” for those visiting London and wanted to catch a game.

When Arsenal visited, however, the neutral end was combined with the away end, and the entire stand was for sale through Arsenal’s website to away fans only. This took the allocation from around 3,000 to just shy of 6,000 in the Putney End. It was never an issue for fans to get credits.

However, with the £30 cap on away tickets, Fulham have rescinded this agreement.

The £30 price cap for Premier League away tickets was introduced at the start of the 2016-17 season following sustained campaigning by supporters. It meant that loyal away fans would no longer be affected by Category A price rises – it would cost Arsenal fans £4-500 more a season in tickets to go to every away game in comparison to smaller clubs like Burnley.

For visiting London clubs, the Putney End would be given over to the away team to sell tickets. This meant that every ticket in that end would be capped at £30.

Last season, I noticed a lot more Fulham fans under the stands, mixing with Arsenal fans. It was something I had not seen before as previously the Putney End was exclusive to Arsenal fans. This exposed that Fulham had reigned on their agreement and decided to keep the end split – 3,000 away Arsenal fans paying £30 a ticket and 2,000 “neutral” fans paying £79 (2025/26 prices).

I would say 90% of those fans in the neutral end were Arsenal. That means that they have paid £49 more for a ticket in the same end, just because Fulham have decided to re-categorise it neutral fans.

An additional £49 over 2,000 tickets is £98,000. If we assume the previous agreement was for all London clubs and Manchester United and Liverpool, this decision generates Fulham an additional £784,000 a season. And it is probably less than that if games against the smaller London clubs such as Crystal Palace and West Ham are not priced at the highest category.

So a decision by Fulham generated them an additional quarter of a million pounds. Really not much in modern football finance terms. But it then more than doubles the price of tickets.

Yesterday morning, I struggled with my 37 credits to get a ticket. Only limited tickets went on sale to 35+. I ended up with two tickets, not sat next to each other, with a restricted view. I won’t complain, I am going to the game and we will all find a place to stand together.

But Fulham’s decision is denying fans tickets to a brilliant away day. It is meaning that only 3,000 tickets were available (and many of them disappear into the hands of players, coaches, sponsors, box holders, et al), rather than 5,000.

A game that was never an issue to get tickets for has now become an issue. And if you miss out on the away end, you will have to pay an additional £49 to sit in the neutral end. Which is the same end as the away end, drinking in the same bars, surrounded by away supporters.

I have never really warmed to Fulham as a club beyond it being a decent away day. They have always come across as very plastic, with a fanbase of people who just want a day out at the football regardless of who it is. They are the epitome of Against Modern Football.

Their decision to no longer combine the neutral end with the away end for Arsenal fans is a decision driven by greed. They should hold their hands in shame.

Keenos