Giroud injury would mean a change of formation for Arsenal

A lot of talk over the last few weeks would be how would we line up if Olivier Giroud picked up an injury. Like many others, I held my breath as he limped off the pitch last weekend against Sunderland. Whilst Giroud is a brilliant physical specimen – his last 4 seasons he has played 42, 43, 52 & 57 games for club and country – it is inevitable that he will pick up an injury.

Were that to happen, it would potentially cause a catastrophe as we have no top class 2nd choice striker in the squad. An injury prone postman in Yaya Sanogo and Nicklas Bendtner (cnut) are our only two proper striking options in the squad. That is not good enough and it would cause a worry.

Writing a few things down on paper, messing about with players in positions and formations, I have come up with a good possible solution were Oliver Giroud to get an injury. It would see us move from our current 4-2-3-1 formation to a narrower 4-3-2-1 Christmas tree formation.

The defence does not need to be talked about for obvious reasons. As we move through the midfield, it would see us have 3 central players in front of the defence. This would make us a tad bit more defensive, but also allow us to sit deeper. Jack Wilshere & Aaron Ramsey on the left and right of the 3 would be a given. The central would be either Mathieu Flamini or Mikel Arteta, depending on injuries. This would allow Wilshere & Ramsey to cover the full backs when play is down that side, whilst still allow us to have 2 men on the inside.

Ahead of them, we then have a narrow two in behind the striker. No points for guessing who these would be. Mesut Ozil and Santi Cazorla. They would then sit behind Theo Walcott.

This would see us line up:

Sagna Mertesacker Koscielny Gibbs
Ramsey Arteta Wilshere
Cazorla Ozil

Whilst the formation is narrow, what it would do is get the best out of all the players on the pitch. There would be no point in playing a wider formation with Walcott upfront. He does not have the height or heading ability were we to whip crosses in. What he would require is through balls. Over the top, or quickly in behind. By playing both Ozil and Cazorla in behind him, he would have plenty of ammunition. Also, with Theo up top and Ozil and Cazorla behind, it would leave the opponents with a quandary with how to defend.

Defend deep, and it leaves Cazorla and Ozil on the edge of the box to fire in shots. Defend high, and it allows Walcott to run in behind.

The 3 man central midfield then allows the front 3 to neglect their defensive duties. We are essentially playing with 7 of the outfield 10 with a defensive mindset. This allows Cazorla, Ozil and Walcott to concentrate on attacks, and allows us to sit deeper. This in turn would mean that Cazorla, Ozil and Walcott would spend more time on the half way line, allowing us to launch quick counter attacks.

With a midfield 3 of Ramsey, Arteta & Wilshere, we can certainly play quick counter attacking football. All 3 are excellent passers. All able to either clip the ball over the top of the opponents defence from deep giving Walcott plenty of space to run into, or play the ball shorter into Ozil or Cazorla to build up an attack.

Yes, playing 4-3-2-1 does mean a narrower style of play, but it should still be a winning style. One that should see us put out a strong enough XI to win most games.

Now does anyone know Arsene Wenger’s email address so I can let him know the plan?



5 thoughts on “Giroud injury would mean a change of formation for Arsenal

  1. PaulB

    No matter how many chances Theo would get, he would still struggle to score, if fit Poldoski up front and Walcott on the bench

    1. CB

      Walcott, coming into his best years, 21 goals and 14 assists last season, fastest footballer in the PL, England international…

      Has a run of not scoring (despite the team winning) means he is useless, can’t control the ball, I’ve always said that…

      You choose.

  2. Bashiir

    Arsene Wenger stated in the pre-stoke match conference, “There are not any players that picked up injuries after the Marseille Match” So yeah 🙂

  3. Formation dancer

    A good article and a good option as a formation against teams that will attack us more.

    Currently I see us playing a 4-2-2-2 formation with the 2 forwards Giroud and Walcott skewed central and right and space being left on the left for Gibbs, Wilshere and Ozil to attack.

    If Giroud is out I would keep our current formation but switch it to leave the Right side open and use Podolski and Walcott to play Central and left with switching between them so Walcott can play as inverted left forward/winger or further forward and centrally with Podolski dropping back to link play at times.

    This formation is currently allowing Gibbs to flourish but I am sure Jenko or Sagna would enjoy the same space being open to them on the right.

    Our formation is currently very interesting and fluid and I can see players like Santi, Poldi, Chambo fitting in well to it. Without the outlet of Giroud I can see the formation providing the options needed and our talented midfield enjoying the options upfront and the spaces out wide.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.