Author Archives: keenosafc

Partey, Xhaka, Lokonga, Elneny and Azeez. Happy?

It has been a Boris Johnson sized u-turn as Granit Xhaka has gone from out the door to signing a new contract in a matter of weeks.

With the Swiss midfielder now staying, it is highly unlikely that Arsenal will invest further into central midfield having already purchased Albert Sambi Lokonga for £17.5million from Anderlecht.

Lokonga’s performances in training and pre-season is likely to be one of the reasons Arsenal have stuck with Xhaka – alongside no club in Europe having much money to pay Arsenal’s asking price.

The Belgium midfielder came with the backing of Anderlecht manager Vincent Kompany and Thierry Henry – who is part of Roberto Martinez’s nation team set up.

But his performances thus far have come as a surprise and he is closer to being a regular first team player than perhaps Edu and his team realised.

It is the performances of Lokonga that has perhaps led to Arsenal sticking with Xhaka rather than spending £30m+ on an Yves Bissouma.

Why make that investment if the club now think that in 12 months Lokonga could be the main man?

So if we are going into next season with Xhaka, Thomas Partey, Lokonga and Mo Elneny, are we happy?

I have always liked the balance in Xhaka and Partey in the middle of the park.

Partey is the power, the one that presses, whilst Xhaka is more static and disciplined.

Xhaka is the man to get the ball from front to back fairly quick whilst Partey is more likely to travel forward with the ball at his feet through the midfield. It is a midfield that can work.

Backing those two up is then Elneny and Lokonga.

I like Elneny.

He is a simple player who does not try too much. Just a solid individual. Will never win you a game but rarely make a mistake t lose you it. Solid 7 out of 10 player. Sort of many you need in the squad.

And Lokonga is the unknown.

He could make a similar impact as Patrick Vieira all them years ago, burst on the scene and be pushing for a starting place as the season goes on.

I would imagine that Elneny would replace Xhaka and Lokonga will be the Thomas Partey understudy.

4 in the middle might feel light, but it has to be remembered we do not have European football next season.

The 5th option could be Ainsley Maitland-Niles or Joe Willock; however I expect both to leave us before the transfer window shuts.

You then have 18-year-old Miguel Azeez.

Azeez has come back from his summer break looking stronger. The boy is becoming a man.

Whilst he missed out on the senior squads trip to Scotland due to injury, he impressed against Watford with a well taken goal.

At the weekend he was left out of the Mind Series squad, instead playing with the U23’s at Ebbsfleet, again scoring a goal.

Young players need to play to continue developing.

Whilst some might be calling for him to be a regular of Mikel Arteta’s first team squad, would sitting on the bench week in week out as 5th choice midfielder be detrimental for his future development?

He would be best off left with the U23s. He is just 18 remember.

Play regular football with his age group, but also train regularly with the senior team.

That way he gets the game time he needs to develop, but can step up to the senior team if there are injuries.

So Partey, Xhaka, Lokonga, Elneny and Azeez. Happy?

Keenos

Europe is broke

The reality is, teams across Europe have no money.

Premier League sides have spent a combined £511million so far this summer.

Next up is the Bundesliga and Serie A, who have both spent £81million.

Ligue 1 clubs have spent £213m and La Liga clubs just £111m combined.

Real Madrid and Barcelona currently have huge financial constraints after decades of spending beyond their budgets. And over in Italy Champions Inter Milan are in financial meltdown whilst Juventus are looking at loan deals.

PSG are the only team in France splashing money, whilst German sides are basically spending what they bring in.

This leaves the likes of Arsenal struggling to sell players.

Unless another English club comes in for someone like Granit Xhaka or Hector Bellerin, Arsenal will be forced to accept a small bid (or a loan deal) from a European side if they wish to sell.

Roma’s biggest signing of the season so far is Rui Patricio. The former Wolves keeper moving for £10.35m. They have spent £23million total.

It is not that they are being cheap when it comes to the Xhaka deal. They just do not have the money to sign him.

And the lack of money in Europe is causing headaches to not just Arsenal but also the likes of Chelsea.

When you look at yesterdays game between Arsenal and Chelsea, both teams were littered with players neither club wants but are unable to sell.

Bellerin, Willian, Runarsson, Kolasinac, Xhaka, Drinkwater, Barkley, Zappacosta and Batshuayi.

Every Premier League club is in a similar situation. Half a dozen players that they can not move in.

The problem is most Premier League sides have spent their initial funds. Further funds will only be spent once they move players on.

But Europe is causing a blockage n the system.

West Ham, for example, can not move on their unwanted players which would raise say £20-30m which in turn would allow to buy Ross Barkley. Those funds would then allow Chelsea to go and buy someone from Inter Milan.

Inter Milan would then have more cash which would allow them to come to Arsenal and sign Bellerin.

Football economy works no different than any other economy. You need money to keep things moving. If you have one break in system, the system can collapse.

And that is where we are at.

Clubs need to sell to buy. But no one has any money to buy.

The lack of funds across Europe means sides are struggling to sell players to free up funds and squad space for further investment.

Keenos

Xhaka staying at Arsenal “best of a bad deal”

In recent years we have moaned about under selling players.

Had we sold Granit Xhaka to Roma for just £10million this would have been an awful deal.

Whilst Xhaka’s time at Arsenal should be coming to an end; a sale should only be made if it benefits the club.

£10million for Xhaka would not benefit Arsenal.

The sale of Xhaka would have raised some funds towards replacing the Swiss midfielder. £10m would not find a replacement.

So play out the scenario.

We sell Xhaka on the cheap. As a result we have to look a few rings down the ladder for a replacement. We end up spending more money on someone not as good.

It just would not make sense.

People will be miffed at Xhaka getting a new deal; but once an agreement has been reached that he will stay a new deal is the sensible option.

Xhaka has 2 years left on his current deal.

Were we to keep him and not offer him a new deal his transfer value would plummet next year.

At least with a new deal it gives us a better chance of getting better money next summer.

Xhaka staying might not be what the majority want, but better that he stays than we sell him for £10million. It is the best outcome of a bad deal.

Keenos