Is Arsenal striker measly goal output a concern?

Before we signed him, there were plenty of question marks around Viktor Gyokeres, with the biggest red flag being that at 27, he had only really had a decent 2-years in the Championship followed by a fruitful 2-years in Portugal.

The step up from the Portuguese league to the Premier League is huge, just ask Darwin Nunez. So no-one should really be too surprised of Gyorekes’ gol scoring struggles.

But where I am hopeful is that Gyorekes’ atttude is spot on. He is clearly working hard in training to adapt his game to Arsenal, to improve. And his attitude on the pitch is if someone who recognises that he can not just be a goal scorer.

The way he presses and run the channels both pushes defences backwards and creates space for others. It is no surprise that when he goes off, opponents defenders seem to have more time on the ball, can push up 10 yards which means the entire team has more attacking threat.

When you look around the Premier League, the lack of top strikers is frightening, Erling Haaand apart.

Igor Thiago is second on the scoring charts with 11, but if you watch Brentford you will see the Brazilian contributes nothing if he is not scoring goals.

Hugo Etikite (8 PL goals) is clearly a raw talent and is developing well, but he would have been huge risk in the summer of been signed as our first choice striker. Especially at his fee for his previous output.

Nick Woltermade has started wel at Newcastle with 7 PL goals. But he is very one dimensional. He reminds me of Peter Crouch that he will score 10-15 PL goals a season regardless of who he plays for.

Tha you come onto Joao Pedro with 6 Premier League goals. That is just one more tha Gyokeres. This is the Brazilian’s 4th year is a Premier League striker.

Meanwhile, Alexander Isak’s injury issues have continued. I can not tell you how pleased I was that we missed out on this one.

So we went for Gyokeres, and of the PL new boys he looks no worse than them. No better either. And he was the cheapest.

Calvert-Lewin, Mateta and Welbeck have all had spells of goal scoring form, but thESR are not the sort of profile we should have rem looking at.

The only other name is Ollie Watkins. But before his double against Chelsea he had just 3 PL goals. Now he has 5. The same as Gyokeres.

I am confident that the goals will come for Viktor. We just need to ensure us, the fans, stay positive so that he keeps his head up.

And with Gabriel Jesus back and Kai Havertz imminent return, we now have different options to ace different defences.

Keenos

Mikel Arteta the reincarnation of George Graham

Whilst Mikel Arteta is a “son of Arsene Wenger”, making waves in the managerial game alongside the likes of Cesc Fabregas, Robin van Persie, Patrick Vieira and the recently appointed Jack Wilshere, he is more comparable to another iconic Arsenal manager – George Graham.

Graham came into an Arsenal Football Club in the doldrums.

When appointed in 1986, we were 15 years without a title, 7 years without a trophy, and loitering in and around mid-table.

A squad filled with players reaching the end of their career who were not performing as expected, one of Graham’s first tasks was to remove them from the club and replace them with younger, hungrier players. New players were signed and youngsters promoted from the academy.

This is comparable to the situation that Arteta came in, where his first task (or Phase as some like to call it) was pushing out those overpaid, underperforming, egotistical former superstars (Ozil, Aubameyang, etc), and replacing them with younger, hungrier talents.

Graham built a team based on being defensively solid and discipline first. This did not mean he built a defensive team, but one that understood if you did not concede, you did not lose. Likewise, Arteta’s team are disciplined and defensively solid. We do not concede shots on target, let alone goals.

Both Graham and Arteta respected the importance of set pieces – Tony Adams scored 22 goals in the 5 seasons from 1986/87 to 1990/91, whilst Gabriel has 19 and counting in the last 4 and a half years.

This season (and we are in the early stages) is reminding me a lot of 1990/91. The almost invincibles.

That year, Graham’s Arsenal won the league, conceding just 18 goals. And whilst the “Boring, Boring” tag was beginning to materialise, we finished 2nd top scorers with 74 goals. Meanwhile, that lot up the road were beginning to play “thrilling attacking football”, which they were heavily praised for.

In reality, Tottenham’s play was not thrilling, attacking football. It was an ill-disciplined approach that led to chaos, high-scoring games, and not particularly great results. They failed to score more than the 74 league goals Graham’s Arsenal scored in 1990/91 between 1985 and 2017. And have only achieved north of that figure twice in 60-years.

And it was a bit like that last season. Whilst Arteta was being criticised for his disciplined approach, Tottenham had “Ange-ball” and the Australian’s supposed fre-flowing attacking football. We outscored Spurs last season just as Graham continually did as manager.

The key is discipline and defensive solidity. You can do both without being a defensive team.

Graham’s 91 side conceded just 18 goals and won the league as second top scorers.
Under Jose Mourinho, Chelsea conceded just 15 goals in 2005/05 as they won the league. They finished 2nd top scorers.
Right now we have conceded just 3 league goals in 8 games. We are second top scorers.

I am sometimes baffled by the way some of our fans who rightly glorify George Graham and his achievements are then critical of the way Mikel Arteta sets up. The parallels between the two are so obvious.

From inheriting transitional squads, integrating young players, and prioritising a strong defensive structure. Respecting set-pieces and being a disciplinarian. Promoting a pragmatic, defensively solid approach to the game.

The only thing missing for Arteta is the honours (although many seem to forget he has an FA Cup and 2 Community Shields to his name). These will come.

When Wenger left, the question was “who can replace him?”. The correct answer seems to be the reincarnation of George Graham.

PS: Yes, I know GG is still with us!

Keenos

Are you not entertained?

4-nil
2 goals for Viktor Gyokeres
8 goals in 3 Champions League games
ZERO goals conceded
Top of the Premier League
25 goals in 12 this season
Just 3 goals conceded

Are you not entertained?

The banter boys were out in force yesterday afternoon, predicting that Arsenal v Atletico Madrid game would be the “most boring in Champions League history”, with both Mikel Arteta and Diego Simeone parking the bus and neither intent on playing attacking football.

I really do not understand the concept of Arteta’s Arsenal being this boring, defensive team that parks the bus in every game. The facts are there for all to see.

We play with the highest defensive line in the league, whilst we face, on average, the deepest defensive lines in the league.
At 58.6%, we rank 4th for average possession, and whilst also being the league leaders in touches in the opponents’ box.

Being the best side defensively in the league does not mean that you play defensive football. It just means you are well organised without the ball and have players who are disciplined and obsessed by keeping a clean sheet.

Arsenal are the only team in world football who could be criticised for limiting their opponents to one shot on target in 3 games whilst scoring 7 goals.

Many of those who criticise Mikel Arteta for playing boring, boring football are the same who, when the debate is had, put George Graham ahead of Arsene Wenger.

It was George Graham’s team that led us to sing “1-nil to The Arsenal” proudly, whilst under Wenger, we sarcastically chanted “Boring, Boring Arsenal” after the Frenchman bought a new more attacking style of football to Highbury.

So why do the same people idolise Graham for his style of play, but criticise Arteta? It is almost like they have an agenda to push.

It is also easy to forget that we have won just two games 1-nil this season. Man U and Fulham away. And they were both games we drew last season. So lets get rid of this myth that all we do is win games 1-nil.

And is there even a problem with winning a game 1-nil? No.

Last season, we were let down by too many draws – 14. Meanwhile, Liverpool had 9. That 10-point difference is what separated the teams at the end of the season.

In 2024/25, 9 of the games we drew, we led in. We also lost from a losing position once. That is 21 points lost from winning positions. Meanwhile, of Liverpool’s 9 draws, they conceded first on 7 occasions. So whilst we were drawing games from winning positions, Liverpool were drawing (and often winning) games from losing positions. That was the key story of last season.

So why are we now complaining that we are no longer drawing from winning positions? I would take 1-nil to The Arsenal all day long over going 1-nil up and drawing 1-1. And we win the league this year by turning those draws from winning positions last season into wins. Even if it is by a single goal.

Am I entertained? Yes. And if you are not loving us being top of the league, and with a 100% record for wins and clean sheets in the Champions League, then maybe football is not for you.

As I have said elsewhere, those who “demand” more exciting football would also moan had we scored 3-4 more goals this season, conceded 7-8 more, and were currently sitting 4th or 5th. They have their more exciting football, but at what cost?

I was delighted to see Viktor Gyokeres on the score sheet again last night. We said the goals would come in yesterday’s blog, and like London buses, two came in quick succession. The brace takes him to 5 for the season.

It was also a superb finish for Gabriel Martinelli.

Many, including myself, would not have been upset if the Brazilian left us in the summer. Although I always stated the bid would have to be huge and the replacement would have to be World Class.

As it transpired, no huge bid came in, and no World Class left winger came onto the market. I still maintain that replacing Martinelli is a bit of a headache, and there are only a handful of left wingers who would be an upgrade – many of whom are unobtainable.

I think Eberechi Eze offers us something different on the left wing and could well make that position his own. We would then have the raw speed, energy and directness of Martinelli and the more cute, dropping inside to tight spaces of Eze.

With 4 goals this season, he is well on the way to reaching double figures across all competitions, which needs to be his minimum standard.

Enjoy Wednesday.

Keenos