Tag Archives: Jack Wilshere

“Well in Jack” or “Grow up Jack”?

So last night Jack Wilshere got sent off in an U23 game against Manchester City:

He was on the end of a bad, late tackle from some nobody trying to make a name for himself, and respond by pushing the nobody to the ground which led to a scuffle amongst the players.

Having been sent off alongside the nobody, he proceeded to push the Man City player when the two were in the tunnel. Proper Sunday League stuff. Two players sent off, have a scuffle in the changing rooms.

Now in response to this incident, there have been two clear schools of thought:

Well in Jack

Arsenal have lacked fight, lacked bottle, for years. The type of stuff Jack has in abundance. He does not let players bully him, he does not let them bully his team mates. He has a nasty streak, something which we often miss.

In the defeat to Stoke, we were timid, we let them dominate us physically. This is not the first time this has happened. Whilst Jack might not be the biggest, he will get stuck in, will get in your face.

The media have gone OTT with the story, reporting that Wilshere punched a kid in the face. Some even saying it is a new low for his career.

Well lets get something right straight away, a played who has suffered so many injuries, so many set backs, being sent off certainly is not a low point in his career.

And lets look at the facts:

The “brawl” was caused by a very late tackle, then the same playing going down holding his face as if punched. Wilshere 100% victim in that.

A player coming back from injury being unhappy that a nobody has tried to do him. Tried to put him out the game again. Wilshere responded in the right manner.

Maybe if more of our players had the mentality of Wilshere, we would not be putting the ball out of play everytime an opposing centre back gets caught up the field and go’s down feigning injury cause he is knackered?

Well in Jack.

Grow up Jack

This is the sort of incident that has blighted Jack Wilshere’s career. A petulant reaction which led him to be sent off.

He did not need to respond like that. The ref saw the incident, had blown the whistle. Let him do his job. By getting himself sent off, he lost the side the possible advantage of 11 v 10.

Wilshere needs to grow up. He is like Peter Pan. His best performance was when he was 18, and he acts like an 18 year old. His behavior would be more suited to a Magaluf lout than a professional footballer.

What, with the smoking, the brawling, the drinking, everything that follows him around, he really does need to take a long hard look at himself.

Here he is, 26 in January, trying to start a fight with 17 year old Tyreke Wilson. And the shove in the tunnel really sums him up. Why was he trying to bully, trying to attack, a kid.

Whilst the likes of Dele Alli is playing Champions League football and being courted by Real Madrid, Jack Wilshere is playing U23 football ,recently loaned out to Bournemouth, and only some side in Turkey that no one has heard of are interested in him.

Wilshere is a senior player. He is not a kid anymore. He should be concentrating on getting his fitness together, not starting fights with kids.

His career hangs by a thread. He needs to grow up.

Keenos

Arsenal’s transfer window has derailed

Well it has happened. The transfer window started off so well with the capture of Sead Kolašinac and Alexandre Lacazette but has now derailed like a South West Train in morning rush hour.

It is all so predictable. It has all been seen before. And it is all so frustrating. Just as you think things are going to be different, you were promised they were different, you fooled yourself into believing they were different, you are let down.

This transfer window is turning into the exact same as other transfer windows. And it keeps happening. And you can only blame the management, from Arsene Wenger upwards. If it was a one off, you would give them the benefit of the doubt. But it is not a one off. This sort of transfer window has happened for Arsenal for over a decade.

Firstly we have the public chase of Monaco’s Thomas Lemar.

Reports are Thomas Lemar was done. That he wanted, and had agreed, to join the club. All that was left was for Arsenal to agree a fee. And like so many transfers beforehand, that was the stumbling bloke.

Of course, no one knows exactly what is going on, but reports are that Arsenal did not meet Monaco’s early season valuation. The two clubs were not too far behind, but Arsenal were just not willing to stump up the cash.

By the time Arsenal finally decided to pay the asking price, Monaco had moved the goal posts. Having already sold Bernardo Silva, Tiémoué Bakayoko, Benjamin Mendy and a handful of squad players, the asking price of Thomas Lemar jumped up. Arsenal had dragged their heels and have ended up missing out.

Perhaps Arsenal should have given up on the chase a few weeks ago, when the Monaco management had made it clear that Lemar would not be sold. Arsenal should have either made Monaco an offer that they can not refuse, or just moved on. Instead it seems we have done neither.

We then come to player sales. How long have we moaned about too much dead wood at the club? Too long. Yet here we sit, in the middle of August, and the likes of Mathieu Debuchy, Carl Jenkinson, Francis Coquelin, Kieran Gibbs and Lucas Perez are still at the club.

Even the ‘semi dead wood’ of Jack Wilshere, Theo Walcott and Calum Chambers are here.

Clubs do not want to sign our players. Are we holding out for too much? Are they demanding too much money? Or are the players just crap? Probably a mixture of all 3. But it feels like a blocked drain at the moment. There is too much shit waiting to leave that we are unable to add anymore on top (I will work on this analogy).

With Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain looking to move, and no central midfield reinforcements on the horizon, we might end up in the situation where some players who really should not longer be at the club end up remaining as squad players.

Having got through a U23 game a few days ago, I can see Wenger looking at Jack wilshere and thinking might as well keep him. Rather than spend £20-£30m on someone like Jean-Michael Seri, he keeps Jack Wilshere.

Likewise, if Ox does go, Debuchy or Jenkinson will be thrown a lifeline.

Add in Coquelin likely to stay, Gibbs seemingly happy to see out his contract, Walcott not being replaced, and Arsenal pricing Chambers out of a move, it will be the same old stale squad filled with players who should have been shifted on years ago.

It is all a little depressing. All a little bit of same old, same old.

Keenos

Jack Wilshere: “Bad deal better than no deal”

Reports are circulating that Jack Wilshere could be set to leave Arsenal for as little as £9m, with Italian side Sampdoria the interested party.

In the current market place, when the likes of Kyle Walker is going for £50m and Arsenal look set to spend £45m on Lemar, £9m for Jack Wilshere seems a bad a deal.

With a year left on his contract, should Arsenal follow the Jeremy Corbyn mantra of a bad deal being better than no deal, or follow Theresa May who is happy to take no deal rather than a bad deal

Wilshere’s contract is set to expire in 12 months time. This leaves Arsenal with three obvious options:

1. Sell him this summer
2. Keep him and release on a free in 2018
3. Offer him a new contract to stay

Working backwards, we will start with point 3. Offering Jack Wilshere a new contract.

There has never been doubting Wilshere’s talent. England’s most naturally gifted midfielder since Gazza. But he is now 25 and has never fulfilled the potential he showed all them years ago as a teenager against Barcelona.

Wilshere has been hit by a horrendous run of injuries.

Since his breakthrough season in 2010/11, when he played 35 league games, his league appearances record reads:

2011/12: 0 league games
2012/13: 25
2013/14: 24
2014/15: 14
2015/16: 3
2016/17: 29

Last season he went on loan to Bournemouth in an attempt to prove that, in less intensive conditions, he could stay fit. He ended up breaking down mid-April.

There is no doubting Wilshere, when fit, is a wonderful player. But he is simply not a player Arsenal can rely on. With up to 60 games next year, Arsenal need players capable of playing in every single one of them.

When you look at the last 3 Premier League Champions, Chelsea, Leicester and Chelsea (again) they all had one thing in common – they played the same starting XI for most of the season.

Wilshere go’s in the same box as the likes of Jamie Redknapp and Darren Anderton. Talented midfielders who just could not stay fit.

Arsenal would be crazy to offer him a new contract.

I see some people saying “give him a one year deal, pay as he plays”. Get your heads in the real world lads. Why would he sign this is he has a 4 year deal on decent money being offered elsewhere?

Wilshere is currently coming to an end of a £90,000 a week contract. Even if we encourage him to take a 20% pay cut, that is still £72,000 a week. Over a new 4 year contract that is £15m.

I have always found it interesting that many of those who slated Arsene Wenger and the board for giving Abou Diaby his last contract at 25 are demanding Wilshere get one. Hypocrites.

To tie up £15m over 4 years in a player who has averaged 17 league games a season over the last 4 season is bad business.

Giving Jack a new deal is something that should simply not be considered.

We then come to the “no deal better than a bad deal”.

There is a school of though that maybe, like some argue with Alexis Sanchez and Mesut Ozil, Arsenal should roll the ride, take the risk, let his contract run down to have him one more season.

For starters he is no where near the ability as the aforementioned. He doesn’t even get into our strongest 11.

Secondly, letting Jack Wilshere’s contract run down would actually cost the club £14m as we would miss out on any potential transfer fee, and have to pay out £5m in wages to Wilshere.

Over the next 12 months, that money can be put to better use elsewhere. Like going into the pockets of Ozil and Sanchez, or offsetting the majority of the salary demands for Lemar – a player with a great injury record.

With Wilshere not fully fit, there is no guarantee how many games he would play next season.

Arsenal could end up giving him one more year and him not actually playing.

Letting Wilshere’s contract run down would be another case of us making a player very rich without him actually contributing much.

The final option is selling him – no matter if it is a bad deal for Arsenal.

The immediate impact of selling Wilshere is it frees up wages. Close to £5m. Add on any transfer fee we might get for him, Arsenal would be looking to make just shy of £15m by selling him. This is money that could be used elsewhere, as already explained.

Arsenal could try and protect themselves but adding a buyback clause to his contract, ensuring that if he has a good, fit 2 years, Arsenal could get him back in.

Wilshere is a player who now offers nothing to Arsenal. When fit, he does not start. When injured, he does not start. Arsenal would be best off shot of him, and use whatever comes in to invest in someone new.

Jack Wilshere might be one of our own, and often you hear fans talk using their heart rather than their head when it comes to him, but this summer he needs to be sold on. A

Even if it means Arsenal accepting a bad deal.

Keenos