Tag Archives: She Wore A Yellow Ribbon

Nothing has changed in 5 years, why the noise now?

So I was looking for an old blog on our old site for GC and was unable to find it (something he wrote way back in 2008 about Stan Kroenke being the wrong man for Arsenal).

Whilst I could not find that blog, I came across another, written in 2010 by him:

OK, its been a while since I have written anything other than my normal “10 reasons why..” this is due to the time I have had to do any decent writing and the fact personally I’d rather read quick bullet points and try and see the lighter more pisstaking side of The Arsenal than read paragraphs of rubbish like other blogs/websites. But this morning ! am just going to let my fingers do some damage to my already battered from last nights keyboard.

Those that have the misfortune to have read some of the articles/status/messages I have put up over the last few years know I am not a big fan of the direction the club has been going in. I don’t like the new ground, I don’t like anyone on the board of directors,Ivan in particular I find a complete waste of space, what does this fella do ??..and sadly now I feel its time Wenger has to sit in a dark room and have a good think.

The new ground – lifeless soulless and full of tourists, no wonder a lot of our traditional support now choose to stay away

The board of directors – Only interested in building flats, reducing what was called “an affordable debt” mainly I fear to increase there own share price

Ivan – Sorry mate, Arsenalisation to me reads Americanisation, you are no David Dein (he’s got a lot to answer for over the current mess as well, but at least he knew how to buy a player)

Wenger – Your experiment is over now, you are losing the backing of a hell of a lot of fans.

Now I am not moaning at Wenger because we have lost a few games,anyone with half a brain knew we would struggle after 5years of neglect in the transfer market. But its the manner of how we are losing that really bites, 2 nil up at home at half-time to the scum and the team come out in the 2nd half like someone had slipped them some kind if daterape drug in the half-time cuppa. Needing a draw last night and yeah we was having a bad night of it and couldn’t break down Braga, so why start bringing on attacking players and leave ourselves open to the counter attack, block the game up, come away with a point and the final game in the group stages wouldn’t be so edgy. Yes that tactic of all out attack would of worked when we had players like Henry,Freddie,Pires,Bergkamp,Kanu even to come on and do something special but NONE of the current squad would make it into anyone’s best 11 over the Wenger years.

SO this is a simple request to the board and to Mr Wenger, BUY BUY BUY this January, prove that when we was told moving grounds would enable us to compete with the biggest clubs in Europe in the transfer market that it wasn’t lies. Prove to us that you have the ambition more than just finishing in the top 4 each season. Prove to us that we are a football club first and a building company second.

This was written in November. Not November 2015, but November 2010. Ten years ago. And yet, over 5 years on, nothing has changed. It could have been written this morning and would be equally as relevant now.Bj6UNgFIQAA8vBh

Nothing has changed in 5 years, so why the noise now?

Keenos (with help from SheWore)

Arsenal to benefit from injury problems

A player getting injured is never a positive. No matter how much you might dislike said player, or he be out of form, losing a player for any length of time is bad news.

However, as the saying go’s, every cloud has a silver lining. And with Aaron Ramsey’s injury, there is a silver lining.

Since the turn of the year, Arsenal have struggled in the centre of midfield. Most evident was against Manchester United at Old Trafford, where there just seemed to be a huge hole between defence and attack.

The main cause of this issue is not having a player who operates between attack and defence who can transition the play.

Transition is one of those buzz words that has come into football recently. It basically means taken the ball through zones. From defence into midfield, from midfield into attack. It can happen in two man ways, passing and running.

Yaya Toure, for example, is brilliant at running the ball from midfield into attack. He picks up the ball in the middle of the park and drives forward with it, forcing players back.

Since Santi Cazorla picked up his injury, Arsenal have struggled with this transition. Cazorla in recent years a perfect example of a player who transitions the ball by passing it.

Francis Coquelin and Aaron Ramsey individually are excellent players. They have engines on them, and will be important players in any team. The issue is neither of them is great at either passing the ball, or running with it.

Coquelin is a player who breaks up the play, Ramsey a player who covers a lot of ground and gets in the opponents box. You can probably count on one hand how often either have picked up the ball from the defence, and ‘pinged’ it out to the wide men, or over the top for someone else to run on it. And I would be surprised if either have dribbled it past a man this season.

It is simply not their game.

Alexis Sanchez (running) and Mesut Ozil (passing) are excellent transitioners (at this point I am making up words). But there work is done in the opposition third. They rarely come deep to pick up the ball. And nor should they.

What this results in is Arsenal struggling to get the ball from defence to upfront.

How often have we seen the following scenario?

Cech rolls the ball out to Koscielny. He in turn plays it to Mertesacker. The ball go’s out wide to Bellerin, who plays it straight back to Mertesacker. It then go’s forward to Coquelin. Back to Koscielny. Across to Monreal. Back to Cech. How then hoofs it forward.

8 passes. 100% pass rate. But the ball has never left our half. And ends up on the head of the opposing centre back. And 8 passes is not even that many. Arsenal have previously gone side to side, left to right, numerous times, before pressure becomes too much, and the ball is lost.

It is great for pass completion statistics, but not great for scoring goals.

Cazorla was the player who would take the ball of the back 4, or Coquelin, and drive forward with it. Watch his highlights from Manchester City away last season. It was a perfect example of how to transition the ball from defence into attack. Both by running with it and passing it.

Back a few years ago, our man in the middle to transition the ball was Mikel Arteta. His range of passing was exceptional. And so many attacks by Arsenal were started by him. He then allowed Ramsey to push on higher and score the goals he did. Arteta was the key man in the middle of the park.

Since he lost his legs, Coquelin came in for him, and his passing range is just not the same. Ramsey needed to step up, but that is not his game either. Cazorla or Jack Wilshere next to Coquelin would be much more fruitful.

In the same way, Cazorla or Wilshere would struggle alongside an Arteta or Xabi Alonso. None of them have the stamina and physicality to get around the park. Ramsey is the ideal foil for the later type of players.

Coquelin and Ramsey work’s no better than Arteta and Cazorla would work.

Think of the great Spain side of recent years. They had Busquets who was the legs, Alonso who was the passer. Alonso was the key man who gets the play going.

So Arsenal have been in the position recently where they have got lot’s of legs in the middle of the park, but not much that can do anything with the ball. This results in us going wide very early, where there is less space, and we end up putting aimless balls into the box.Hull-City-v-Arsenal-FA-Cup-replay

With Ramsey now out injured, it should mean Mohamed Elneny comes into the middle of the park.

In his performances so far for Arsenal, Elneny has been busy. Always moving. Always available. There to pick up the ball of any of the back 4, no matter who has it. What he has then done is pick the right ball, and more importantly, ball forward.

When Elneny is on the pitch, Arsenal’s transition from defence through the midfield into the strikers is so much smoother. With Elneny often following the ball forward ensuring that he is either in a position for a pass in the opposition’s final 3rd, or able to restart the play if it breaks down, with having to go back to the defence.

When Coquelin and Ramsey plays, this simply does not happen. Ramsey’s starting position is often too high. And Coquelin does not have the ability to stay with the play when it moves into the final 3rd.

We will miss Ramsey in the next few games. Especially against the likes of Barcelona where you need some more legs. But in Elneny, we have a player who will act as a go between Coquelin in the defence and Ozil in the attacks, and it will make the middle of the park a lot more balanced.

Our play should now be a lot smoother, a lot more attacking.

Up The Arsenal

Keenos

Arsenal looking to sign England striker

So the Arsenal chatter last night during the Liverpool v Manchester United game was the future of England striker Daniel Sturridge.

The discussion around Liverpool’s Sturridge centred on a rumour that he was to be Arsenal’s number one target next summer.

It was met with mixed response.

Half of the tweets I read were positive. They remember Daniel Sturridge the world class finisher. The new Ian Wright. The man who scored 31 league goals in 43 games in his first 18 months for Liverpool as part of the Sturridge Suarez Sterling frontline that nearly took Liverpool to their first league title in 25 years.

The other half were negative. Another Diaby was often mentioned. Pointing to the horrendous injury record which has seen him play just 18 league games in the last 2 seasons, and not play for England since September 2014.

Now his injury record is diabolical. But he is a talented player. So should Arsenal go for him?

Source: BBC Sport

Source: BBC Sport

On the face of it, I would tend to lean to a no, due to his injury record. We have had too many players who have been injury prone over the years. The likes of Rosicky, Arteta, Wilshere. And these injury prone players being constantly missing leads to too much pressure being put on those who do not have major injury issues. The likes of Welbeck and Giroud. Ozil.

This then means that these players play when not 100% fit are forced to play, increasing their chances of getting an injury.  And in turn leads to even bigger injury problems within the squad.

One of the key reasons why Leicester are top, Spurs are second, is due to their lack of injuries. Neither has lost a key player (Vardy, Mahrez, Kane, Erickson) for an extended period. It was the same with Chelsea last season.

In an increasingly competitive Premier League, keeping players fir is uber important.

So if Arsenal were to sign Daniel Sturridge, they would be signing a player who’s next injury is just around the corner.

But Daniel Sturridge is a class act when fit. And part of me looks at it and thinks lets take the risk.

Upfront our current options are Olivier Giroud and Danny Welbeck. Sturridge is better than both, when fit. But both are still very good players. Giroud has hit the 20 goal mark this season. What this would mean is that you could take the risk on Daniel Sturridge, knowing that you have sufficient back up to him were he to break down.

Sturridge would be the centre of an attacking trio that would potentially see Danny Welbeck on the right, and Alexis Sanchez on the left.

It would not surprise me to see Theo Walcott leave Arsenal this summer, maybe going the other way to Liverpool.

Arsenal would line up very attacking with that front 3. It would almost mirror what Liverpool played with Sturridge Suarez Sterling. Or England when they played Welbeck Rooney Sturridge.

What it gives you is a lot of versatility upfront. All 3 can play in the 3 front positions. Plenty of movement. Very hard to mark. Goals from all angles.

Sturridge would drop wide, with either Alexis or Welbeck dropping in the middle. Welbedk would drop inside with Sturridge dropping wide. And behind the trio would be Mesut Ozil pulling the strings. Conducting.

It would be exciting. It would be direct.

And then if Sturridge does break down, you still have plenty of options.

Giroud could come in, forcing a slight change in direction. Or Welbeck could go into the middle with Joel Campbell playing on the right, keeping the shape of the side.

Of course, this is all ifs and buts, Sturridge might break down in the next few weeks and the deal could be off.

There is a lack of top class strikers in world football at the moment. And even less that would potentially look to leave their current club. Despite his injury record, Daniel Sturridge might be the best option.

It is a quandary. If he does get fit, which he seems to be slowing doing, he is a brilliant striker. But we used to say that about Abou Diaby. We currently say it about Jack Wilshere. If they get fit, they are brilliant midfielders.

I think it is a risk worth taking.

Keenos

123