Tag Archives: Transfers

Player sales to finance 65% of Arsenal’s £180m summer spending spree

In a recent blog, we touched on the subjects of amortisation and player book value.

If you do not have time to firstly read this blog, amortisation is the accounting tactic of spreading the cost of a player’s transfer fee over the length of his contract – with it being further amortised if a player extends.

Meanwhile, a player’s book value is the difference between what we bought a player for, minus what the value of the transfer fee already amortised for. Book value is a more important metric at assessing profit / loss of a player than the simplistic net profit.

To take this thinking a step further, and to try and look into the future, I thought it would be interesting to look at the players that could possibly leave us this summer and assess:

  • What their book value is
  • What profit (or loss) we are likely to see if they are sold
  • What saving they would make us in amortisation costs if they were sold

As discussed in the previous blog, book value is important as it is this difference that determines if you show a profit or loss in your accounts following a player sell.

Sell for less than their book value and you have to use additional funds to offset the difference, whilst it is the amount your sell for above the book value that becomes available to purchase replacements (and not the entire incoming transfer fee).

Assessing the amortisation saving is also important as that determines what can be spent on new incoming transfers without us needing to increase costs – IE if Player A was costing us £10m a year and we sold them, and signed Player B for £50m on a 5-year deal, our outgoings per year would be the same (without taking into account wage differences, agents fees and bonuses).

Together, book value profit determines your new cash flow when buying a player, whilst amortisation helps you understand how much space you have in your accounts to add additional costs (once the outgoing players costs have been taken off).

Note: Ramsdale’s book value has been incorrectly calculated. It should be £8m, with £16m amortised. That would increase his book profit to £17m and make the total book profit £126.12m.

Now a caveat before I start, as I know a few of you will be jumping to the comments straight away – the market value is taken from Transfermarkt. Whilst I understand that this is not accurate (as a player’s value is based on what a club will pay for them, not on an algorithm), it is a good place to start.

Every player that looks overvalued (Tavares, Nketiah) is offset by someone that is undervalued (Ramsdale, Lokonga). I think if we received north of £150m for the 8 players mentioned above, we will be doing well.

So this is where what we learned in the last blog can be put into practice.

£158m incoming transfer fees will equate to a book profit of £126.12m. That means that once the remaining unamortised transfer fees is accounted for, we will still be showing a nice profit.

When you consider I have a 5 man hitlist for the summer (yes, I know my list means nothing), which should come to around £180m in spending, we would only need to find an additional £70m in cash money to pay for these new signings.

When it comes to amortisation savings, things are maybe not quite as rosy.

The 5 players that did not come through our academy cost us in the region of £21.44m a year in amortisation costs. I am going to round this up to £21.5m. If you take me £180m and divide it by 5 (all likely to join on a 5 year contract), then the amortisation costs of those coming in will cost £36m. That is a difference of £14.5m

What is interesting is that the amortisation saving, over a 5 year period, comes to £107.5m. So not too far off the £126m we would make in book profit.

So I can comfortably say that if we sell the 8 players mentioned above, we can spend around £110m with it having zero impact on our finances – again, we are not taking into account wages yet. A blog for another day that.

So where does the additional £60m that we need in cash flow come from, and £14.5m in additional amortisation costs? Well that is not an easy answer.

The additional funds will come from one of two places – making savings and increasing further revenue.

Under making savings are things such as wages – if the 5 coming in cost less per annum than the 5 leaving, that saving can simply be transferred across to the amortisation line of the accounts (think when you adjust your budget on Football Manager).

You get Partey’s £200k salary off the wage bill and replace him with someone like Martin Zubimendi on £115k a week, that is a saving of £4.4m a year.

Likewise, I have not accounted for Mohamed Elneny and Cedric Soares. The pair will leave us for nothing at the end of the season (Elneny’s amortisation is so low after 8-years at the club it was not worth factoring in), but cost us around £6.5m a year in wages.

Considering they will not need to be replaced, that is a huge saving that can be put towards covering the increased outgoing.

The second one is further increasing revenue.

Champions League revenue for this year will make a huge difference. We can probably expect to earn around £80m more from this season’s European exploits in comparison to last year’s Europa League. That would more than pay the difference.

We can also look at selling some of the academy graduates that are not up to grade – I am thinking Arthur Okonkwo (who since writing is leaving us on a free) and Charlie Patino. you would expect those two to raise us around £10m combined. That £10m can go straight into purchasing new players.

So if we get things right in terms of outgoings this summer, we could comfortably finance a move for £180m worth of new signings without our costs increasing dramatically.

And whilst the net profit merchants will point to a £70-80m net spend, we will all know this does not really matter. What matters is what is in your accounts and that is amortisation and book value.

In the 3rd installment of this mini-series, I will explore the 5 players on my list, and the financial implications of signing them against what we could be selling. I will also further explore the salaries of those who might leave compared to those coming in and see if we can end up with a “net zero” summer.

Have a great day.

Keenos

The curious case of Tomiyasu’s 2-year deal

Yesterday it was announced that Takehiro Tomiyasu would be following Ben White in signing a new contract. But everything was not as clear cut as the White deal.

Tomiyasu had signed on until 2026, representing a 2 year deal, or a year extension on his current ones. This led to a lot of scratched heads.

My first thought was “has he actually signed a new deal, or is this Arsenal triggering a one-year extension clause”. As it turns out, this was a completely new deal which Tomiyasu was happy to agree.

As time went on, it transpired that the new 2-year deal included a further year option for Arsenal, so in essence it was a new 3-year contract. This is still extremely short for a 25-year-old to agree to.

After more reflection, I came up with two reasons why this deal happened.

The first is it shows where Arsenal are as a club right now. Players want to sign on that dotted line. They want to be involved in the Mikel Arteta journey. So even though the length of the contract was not favourable, Tomiyasu would rather give another 1-2 years to The Arsenal then turn down the deal, leave in the summer and join someone like Aston Villa or Newcastle.

The second is Tomiyasu himself.

On signing his contract, Tomi said: “I am so happy to extend my contract because Arsenal is the best club in the world. It’s a dream to play for this club, so I’m happy.

“When I’m on the pitch I feel the love and energy from the supporters. We are connected a lot so I want to give them something back. I am playing for Arsenal, and this means I’m playing for the Arsenal supporters. That’s why I dedicate my life to this club and the supporters.

“I want to give them something back. The connection between players and supporters is a different level and that makes it more special.”

The first part of his statement shows that he has bought into Arteta’s project and where Arsenal are right now. The second shows that he feels that he owes the club and fans something following his injury issues.

Since joining the club in 2021, he has suffered 4 major injuries that have led him to miss over 40 games for The Arsenal. He clearly feels some sort of guilt over that, and wants to repay the club and fans for sticking by him.

The new deal means that he probably gets another 2-years at the club to show that he can stay fit. And we know that if he keeps fit he can be a big part of our future. If he does not stay fit, Arsenal have not invested too much into him, will trigger the extension in 2026 and sell him.

At 25-years-old, Tomiyasu is also not in “last contract” terrority.

I imagine the money he will be in will be in and around £100k a week. Not many clubs in England or Europe would pay him (or others) that. And if he leaves at 27, he will still be young enough to get another 5-year deal elsewhere.

In the past, we have seen clubs – including Arsenal – offer 5-year deals to players with Tomiyasu’s injury record. And in that 5-years we rarely see them play and are stuck with them until their contract runs down. At least with this deal with can release for free after 2 more seasons, or extend that deal and try and get a fee for him.

It is not very often that you see a player agree to less favourable terms. The 2-year deal is completely in Arsenal’s favour. But this just shows that Tomi wants to be part of Arsenal’s future and repay the fans for their support.

Other news for yesterday is that the Munich away tickets have been announced.

We should get around 3,700, so I am not sure why the club are starting them at 50+ credits. What is odd is that they then advertise all the way down to 10+. They usually advertise down to where they think they will sell out so not sure why they start at 50+ if they predict it will go to 10+.

There can not be more than 3,000 with 30+, and this is further highlighted that once it goes down in 10s below 40+.

The last bit of news is that some places are linking us to a move for Juventus’s Adrien Rabiot. It is a deal I can not see happening.

Whilst his contract does run out at the end of the year, he will certainly not be “free” as his mum will demand inflated wages, a huge signing on fee and a big wad of cash for herself.

Rabiot turns 29 in April and I feel he is a wasted talent – he has never fulfilled his potential.

There has always been a feeling that one-day it might click for him. But at his old age now, those times are running out. He does have the physical and technical ability to play deep into his late 30s at a high level, but I think the time for us sniffing around someone like Rabiot it gone.

Better to buy someone younger, hungrier, who does not have a troublesome history.

Enjoy your Thursday.

Keenos

Tottenham “win” the transfer window as Premier League big boys spend nothing

Big day today! One that I dread every year. I am already nervous about what could happen, keeping my fingers crossed it will be good news. My car is going in for its MOT!

The transfer window slammed shut yesterday. Many of you would have forgotten it was open considering how little business was done.

Premier League clubs spent £715m less than January 2023, with the combined expenditure of the 20 clubs being just £100m. Just 17 permanent deals were made.

The impact of Premier League clubs not spending was seen lower down the leagues as EFL sides spent just £15m – they rely heavily on money coming in from selling players to enable them to buy.

A lot of fans have blamed PSR during the window for the lack of spending, but the truth is most Premier League clubs blew their budget in the summer.

Despite the slow January, the 2023-24 season has seen over £2.5bn spent by Premeir League clubs across both windows – the second-highest total annual transfer spend ever.

The record of nearly £2.8bn was set in 2022/23, driven by Chelsea’s big spending January. Whilst 3rd on the list (2017/18) is around £700m below this years total.

So for those moaning…your club is not spending because they were not allowed due to PSR, they were not spending because they have no money until the summer. And in the case of Everton, your club is not spending because you have lost nearlt half a billion pounds in the last 5-years. If it was not for PSR you would be in administration.

Winners of the transfer window is Tottenham.

I have lost count how many times in the last decades their fans have celebrated “winning” a transfer window. Have not won a trophy in 16-years though.

Spurs signed some unknown Romanian centreback, loaned in a Chelsea reject and reportedly got a £10m deal over the line for some 18-year-old Swedish midfielder that no-one had heard of 4 days ago.

I read an article yesterday that said “Daniel Levy is a genius” and that his “long term planning is coming to fruition”. enic bought Tottenham nearly 24 years ago. they currently sit 4th and have won 1 League Cup in that time. What brilliant long term planning.

Tottenham’s spending in January simply means they will spend less in the summer. Whilst they decided to draw forward some funds, other clubs kept their powder dry to ensure they had the finances to secure their premier targets in 5-months.

Some might say “waiting 5-months could cost the league”, but that makes the assumption that Arsenal or Liverpool’s top targets were available in January. And if they were not, those secondary targets were good enough.

Personally, I would rather wait until the summer to buy a Douglas Luiz or Ivan Toney then sign a Lucas Bergvall or Timo Werner.

Arsenal did see a couple of outgoings in January.

Alex Runar Runarssons time at the club came to an end as we cancelled his contract. He has joined FC Copenhagen for free. What a strange signing he was!

We also cashed in on contract rebel Lino Sousa. The talented teenager’s current deal was due to expire in the summer, sand he was refusing to sign a new one. He has decided to take the step down to Aston Villa, who immediately sent him out on loan to Plymouth. The path to first team football is much clearer at a mid-table than a title challenging side. Good luck to him.

Charles Sagoe Jr, who made an appearance this season in the EFL Cup, has gone to Swansea on loan, whilst Mika Biereth saw his loan deal with Mothwerwell cancelled and is now at Austrian side Sturm Graz.

Tyreece John-Jules has seen his loan deal with Derby County extended until the end of the season. The hope will be that he continues to impress as Derby chase promotion, and they look to recruit him permanently in the summer.

The final deal saw Marquinhos return to after Arsenal pulled the plug on his loan deal to Nantes.

There is talk that Brazilian side Fluminense are in negotiations with Arsenal over a loan deal for Marquinhos that could include a purchase option at the end of the season. The Brazilian window is still open until 11 January.

Marquinhos was always signed as one for the future, and we have seen over history how often these sort of signings do not work out.

For every Gabriel Martinelli poached from obscurity, you get a Marquinhos , Joel Campbell, Carlos Vela, Wellington Silva and others. And this is not just Arsenal, every top team buys a lot of teenage talent from abroad with 95% not making it. You just need to ensure you are not overspending on these “punts” (like Chelsea have done!).

Marquinhos is still only 20 and habours an ambition to play for Brazil at this years Olympics. A good loan deal in Brazil should secure his seat on the plane (if they make it), and a good tournament could see him return to us full of confidence, or add a bit extra onto his price for a sale.

Today the cricket restarts. It has not been a good morning for England.

UTA.

Keenos