Tag Archives: Mesut Özil

10 Reasons why we will beat Hull + My starting 11

1)  Hull played a 3-5-2 in their last game, they do this at our place they will get battered.

2)  Our Captain Arteta is back, he can play CB right ?

3)  We have beaten Hull the last 7 times we have played them.

4) Hull have won once in London in their last 12 away games in de big smoke.

5) The highly versatile defending genius Monreal will play CB, due to Koscielny having a sore leg. young Hayden is also likely to be in the squad.

6) Diaby played 67 mins for the under 21’s last night, counting him out of playing again for atleast a month.

7) Jack had a great international break, showing some great form and spraying long and short balls all over the pitch.

8) All the English lads had a good break, all come back fit, the only problem is Chambers is suspended after picking up 5 bookings.

9) Even with the players we have missing (Hull have a few out too) we have miles too much for them.

10)  Wenger Knows, the pressure is on, all the money in the bank and our back 4 look stretched after only 7 league games, without Ozil and Ramsey today he needs to pick an attacking lineup to unlock what could be 9  men behind the ball tic tacs by Bruce.

My Starting 11 – Chesney, Bellerin, BFG, Monreal, Gibbs, Flamini, Jack, Santi, Podolski, Ox, Welbeck

COME ON THE ARSENAL !!!

card holders

Arsenal’s Injury Crisis – A Simple Solution

Some players are just more injury prone than others. That’s a fact. No matter how much you think there injury record will improve, it never will. From Darren Anderton and Jamie Redknapp in the 90s to Michael Owen in the 00s, some players always struggle to stay fit.

The key is to not have too many of these said players in your squad.

One of the major contributors to Arsenal endless injury crisis is we carry too many players with poor injury records;

Abou Diaby
Tomas Rosicky
Yaya Sanogo
Kieran Gibbs
Jack Wilshere
Theo Walcott
Mikel Arteta
Aaron Ramsey

8 players in our current squad who, over the last 5 seasons, have missed a lot of games, and will continue to do so. I would bet that over the last 18 months, at least half of that list has been injured continually throughout.

Every side suffers injuries. According to the physio room, each Premier League side currently has out, on average, 5 players. Manchester United have the most, at 9, Tottenham the least, at 2. Injuries are an unavoidable part of football.

Arsenal’s problem is that as we carry so many injury prone players, whenever a ‘normal’ player picks up an injury, his loss is exaggerated.

Look at the players involved in out current injury crisis;

Abou Diaby
Yaya Sanogo
Mesut Ozil
Theo Walcott
Serge Gnabry
Mikel Arteta
Mattheiu Debuchy
Olivier Giroud

The list can easily be split into two. Mesut Ozil, Mattheiu Debuchy and Olivieir Giroud have very good injury records. The rest have extremely poor records.

You can not legislate for Giroud injury his ankle blocking a clearance, or Debuchy being crocked in a horrendous challenge, or even the odd knee or hamstring here and there.

But what you can do is ensure that you limit the effect by having a very fit squad. Unfortunately Arsenal do not have that.

By the time we pick up our 2/3 ‘normal’ injuries that every club suffers, we already have 4/5 long term injuries to our injury prone players. This then puts us in an injury crisis.

At Arsenal, over the last 4/5 years, we have always had 4/5 long term injuries, the same handful of players going in and out the treatment room. This then makes it seem like our injury crisis is never ending, as a combination of the above players will always be out.

So how do we solve our current ongoing injury crisis? It is not by changing the training ground, or the medical staff, its by changing the playing staff.

First out of the door should be Tomas Rosicky, Abou Diaby and Yaya Sanogo. These three have been forever injured. They have missed more games than they have played. The ironic thing is that by selling them, it will actually make no difference on the 1st team squad, as neither will be missed. But what it will do is create a bit of a mental change. It would immediately reduce our ‘injury list’ by 3.

The others create a controversial debate:

Jack Wilshere or Aaron Ramsey

It seems one of either Jack Wilshere or Aaron Ramsey is always injured. In the 90s, we mocked Spurs & Liverpool fans for putting Redknapp and Anderton on such a pedastool, yet both were always injured. No point being a brilliant player if you are injured. Wilshere & Ramsey for Arsenal are quickly falling down a similar slide.

Both are talented, but both miss a lot of games. The harsh side of me says ‘get rid of both, we have the money to buy equally as talented, but less injury prone players’. The more moderate side of me thinks we should dump one of them.

As previously said, you can afford to carry one or two injury prone players. At the moment, Arsenal are trying to carry 2 in the same position. Jack Wilshere’s injury record concerns me more than Aaron Ramsey’s. He has not played over 30 league games since his break through season – 2010/11. Is it time we were ruthless and cut our losses with him? Buy someone better and less injury prone? Think with your head, not your heart

Kieran Gibbs

Kieran Gibbs is now 25. When he is on the pitch, he is a great full back. In my opinion, he is England’s best. His record is worse than Wilshere’s, in the fact he has never played more than 30 league games. He really is made of glass.

He is another one who I always think should we cash in on. He can not even be trusted to remain as second choice left back, as chances are high that if the 1st choice left back was injured, he would be too.

It is another head over heart decision. If Kieran Gibbs can not play over 30 league games, should he be at Arsenal?

Theo Walcott

In his younger days, Theo Walcott had a lot of injuries. Many of these were associated with weak shoulders, which he has since had pinned in. His latest injury is a tad abnormal. I put it down to one of the ‘normal injuries’ that every side suffers during the course of a season.

The question over Walcott is how does he return from his injury. He has already had a few set backs, and a player who relied so much on pace, would he have lost a yard having been out for nearly a year?

If it is clear he has lost something, or he does continue to break down, we should flog him quickly. Cash in whilst his stock is high, and move on. Let’s not carry him. Let’s not hope that one day it will improve. It rarely does.

So who would I ship out:

Definitely out

Abou Diaby
Yaya Sanogo
Tomas Rosicky

On a last chance

Kieran Gibbs
Jack Wilshere or Aaron Ramsey

Give him time

Theo Walcott

Arsenal carrying injury prone players is not a new things. Samir Nasri, Robin van Persie and Thomas Vermalaen all had poor records before we signed them, yet we still signed them. Decisions like this just opens us up to entering an injury crisis.

To solve our injury woe’s, we do not need to reinvent the wheel, we just need to ensure that we have a squad full of players with good injury records. Stop buying players with poor records. Ship out the players with poor records.

It really is that simple.

Keenos

 

FFP, Away day woes and Martinez for Ozil ?

Juking the Stats

There was a lot of entertainment this week at the sight of FFP having knock on effects for Manchester City’s attendances at Champions League games. However fans of all clubs would be wise not to mock as this represents a wider issue.

As the club widely reported to have the most expensive tickets it has been obvious for a while that largely speaking our attendances have been down since the early days of the new stadium. The club has come in for much derision at quoting attendances as being near capacity when anyone could see swathes of empty seats.

Whilst administrators at the club may point to those seats having been sold, the fact remains that the demand for those seats has not actually been there. The club can quote whatever figure they like but as the release recently of police reports on actual numbers through the gates has shown, the truth will out. Premier League clubs have just reaped the rewards from their bumper television deal, it’s the most watched league in the world and the Premier League feels like it has the sporting world by the cojones. And here is why I urge caution: In the early 90s the Serie A was in the same situation, their clubs had mega rich subsidisers like the Agnelli family – owners of Fiat – at Juve and of course one Silvio Burlusconi at Milan.

I saw a quote a couple of years ago attributed to Burlusconi circa the early 90s – I unfortunately couldn’t find it for this – when he recognised that it was essential that for television purposes Italian football kept its stadia full to create a sense of atmosphere and tension. Through a combination of hooliganism, corruption, catenaccio, decrepit stadia with chasmic distances to the playing surface – which only diluted the atmosphere further – Italian attendances dwindled as did their global share of the television market. Whilst international audiences looked to the swashbuckling Premier ?League with its newer looking stadia and fans on top of the action creating a greater sense of atmosphere.

The Bundesliga has received a lot of praise in the last five years or so for the standard of the football, 50 + 1 ownership rule which prevents any one person or company owning more than a 49% share in the club and the fact that it produces so many German talents. One of the things English fans seem to admire most aside from 50 + 1 is the effort to make match day tickets affordable, something that has seen attendances grow to the point where a ticket in Dortmund’s south stand is one of the most desirable in world football.

The Bundesliga is currently desperately chasing down the Premier League in terms of global viewing figures, yes at the moment they’re a fair way behind and yes at the moment English attendances are as high as they’ve been since the sixties but as the malaise of Serie A has shown things can change quicker than you realise.

I hope senior people at Premier League clubs – and here’s something I never thought I’d say – are of the same mind as Silvio Burlusconi and recognise how important it really is that they keep stadiums full if they want to continue cashing in on the television market.

Away Woes

I’m sure a lot of people noticed this statistic in a BBC article quoting Joey Barton as saying we lacked a spine:

“Arsenal have won just once – and lost 16 times – in their 20 away matches against sides who have finished in the top five in the past five campaigns”.

I was flabbergasted as I knew our away record to big sides was bad but I hadn’t realised quite how moribund it was. Really something has to change, there are no excuses for a record like that.

Round Pegs, Round Holes

On Sunday we started the Chelsea game in a 4-3-3 formation with Flamini in the holding role, Wilshere and Cazorla just in front, Özil and Alexis left and right advanced positions and Welbeck up front. It has been noted ad nauseam that when Özil plays anywhere except the number 10 position he looks either “uninterested” or “misused”, sometimes both.

When Özil plays at number 10 and has movement around him he looks devastating. To that end, of the formations we play, 4-2-3-1 is the one which suits him best. I can understand Wenger starting with 4-3-3 against Chelsea given our away record at the top sides last year. The aim was not to get swamped in the centre of the park and get a foothold in the game, hoping that we could then nick a goal. But it does present an issue which is what’s the plan with Özil.

We spent £40 million on him and so far opportunities in his preferred role have been intermittent. We started well against Chelsea on Sunday, we competed and we moved the ball from midfield to the final third very fluently. However when we got to the final third we hardly created any clear cut chances and didn’t manage a single shot on target. We have players at the club better suited to playing in wide positions than Özil, Oxlade-Chamberlain for one.

When you make a player your most expensive player of all time, it’s not unreasonable to expect that player will be a fulcrum for your side. It has been reported in the football gossip columns that we’re preparing to return with a January bid for Özil’s friend and compatriot, Sami Khedira, and if true – who knows? – he would be a perfect fit for our midfield given the obvious lack of presence.

There has however been another rumour that Bayern are sniffing around to try and sign Özil. If this is true and if we aren’t going to play him as a number 10 then we have a decision to make because there were whispers from Bayern at the beginning of the season that Javi Martinez – a truly world class holding mid – wasn’t happy that Philip Lahm was being preferred for big games in the holding role.

It’s not inconceivable that we could lose Özil, gain Martinez (and some cash) and come out of it as a stronger team. Personally, I hope we bite the bullet by signing Khedira and giving Özil an extended run as a number 10 to do what he does best which is create unencumbered by defensive duties.

Rory