Tag Archives: Brazil

The Influence of Computer Games on Football Opinions

Today, FIFA 14 is released to the masses. Adults and children throughout the world will be taking day’s off work to get their first taste of the new version – which is basically the same as previous versions with just a few tweaks. Most of them, having just completed GTAV would have just spent £50 on the game and it is this that they will play until Football Manager is out in October.

Over the years, football games have become more influential in the lives of football fans. No longer do they just watch a game on a Saturday, play themselves on a Sunday, and train mid-week, they now spend every woken day playing the simulators. Writing down squads whilst they are supposed to be listening to the teacher. Researching wonder kids during work hours. And spending hours day dreaming on what they are going to do when they get home.

Whilst games such as FIFA, Pro Evolution Soccer, Champions Manager and Football Manager are brilliant – I own a PS3 with just 1 game (or 2, now the new FIFA is out) they also cause my a lot of frustration. Often these games form the opinion of fans when talking about players.

Fans have begun to genuinely build an opinion on a player based on how they perform in a game. Take young players for example. Despite having never seen a young player perform, manager simulators such as Football Manager and Championship Manager will create an opinion for a fan.

Ganso, for example, was massively hyped up last summer. Barely anyone had seen him play. Not many people watch Brazilian football, and he only has 8 caps for Brazil. Very few could genuinely sit and say they thought he would be a good addition to the Arsenal side. Yet many did and many were getting excited over him. Odd.

But not odd when you then remember he has been a star on Football Manager for a few years. People built their opinion on him based on a computer game. They wanted us to spend £20 million+ on a player based on a computer game. It is ludicrous. And now? He is playing for Santos and a big money move to Europe looks unlikely. Football Manager certainly warps the opinion of players.

FIFA also does the same. Anyone who has played the game knows pace is king. If you do not have pace, you will struggle at the game. I believe this is one reason why Per Mertesacker is massively underrated. He is not a FIFA player due to his low pace rating. What FIFA has not got built in properly is how a player reads a game.

If you ever watch Per in real life, you will see he is one of the worlds best defenders. A brilliant reader of the game, he dominates forwards, no matter how quick they are. Pace means nothing if you can not dribble past a defender. And Mertesacker is extremely hard to get past. He will either intercept the pass, or stick out one of his big legs to win the ball. And he does it with ease.

Yes, if a player does get past him, he struggles, but every centre back in the world struggles when they are the wrong side of an attacker.

The problem here is people have built their opinion of Mertesacker based on his FIFA profile. They play with the likes of Kaboul or David Luiz, who are quicker and therefore more suited to the game. They then rate these two as better than Mertesacker, even though they are not.

They base this opinion on a game, not on what they see. Anyone who watch’s these 3 guys on a regular basis will recognise that Per Mertesacker is far superior to the other two.

People also rate Kyle Walker above Bacary Sagna. Again, because Walker is based on the game with brilliant pace. What the game does not show is his positioning is awful and he can not read the game.

The games also change how fan’s think a club is run. They make scouting seem easy. They make signing players seem easy. They make selling players seem easy. “Why can’t we just fax all clubs about Bendtner, offer them a free transfer with a 50% sell on clause” people ask. Well transfers are harder than that.

A game does not take into consideration personal relationships. Families. Wives. A game does not distinguish between playing in Spain, living on a hillside just outside Madrid, and living within the Arctic Circle in Russia. It makes the world of football seem easy. And it is not that easy.

When thinking about football. About players. About how the game works. People need to use their own eyes. Watch players play. Learn how football clubs and transfers work. Not base all their opinions on a game.

Judge players on what you see during games the highlights, or what you read about in reliable papers / magazines. Stop judging players on how good they are on computer games, or YouTube highlights (another frustration!)

Keenos
 

Arsenal – Like Watching Brazil?

It has been claimed many a time that a team is ‘just like watching Brazil.’ This is usually due to that side playing free flowing attacking football with plenty a tricks, flicks and style. Arsenal are currently playing like Brazil. However it is nothing to do with our attacking football. Our or flicks, tricks and step overs. It is in the way we line up. The way we play overall.

This year, Arsene Wenger has moved away from the tika-taka football which saw Arsenal become the second best passing side in Europe – albeit with no success – after Barcelona. With the new signing of Mesut Ozil to go alongside Santi Cazorla and Theo Walcott, Arsenal are now lining up 4-2-3-1. The traditional Brazilian formation. And we are playing like a Brazilian side, from front to back.

Starting at the top, the Brazilian 4-2-3-1 relies on a target man. A forward who does not wonder too much. A pivot for the 3 men around him to play around. Previously Brazil had Fabiano. Now they play with either Jo or Fred. Neither will frighten a defence. Both are assumed a ‘weak link.’ They lack flair, and are often not the main goal outlet. But, like Giroud, that is not their job. There job is to allow others to link up with them. To run across the defensive line. And to hold up play. To work hard for the team creating space for others to run into. There unselfishness allows others to play.

Aaron Ramsey’s second goal was a typical example of how important a role the striker plays in the 4-2-3-1 as a creator, rather than a goal scorer. Ramsey played the ball into Ozil, who then played it 1st time into Giroud. Giroud who had dropped deep played the ball into the space he’d left in behind, back to Ramsey who was now occupying said space as the defence moved out following Giroud, leaving the Welshman with a simple finish. It was a goal you see a lot in Brazil. The striker dropping deep assisting his midfield runner.

Oliver Giroud with his height, strength, touch and ability is an ideal man to play the pivot. Only Ibrahimovic springs to mind as a player in world football who can play up top in the 4-2-3-1 better then Giroud.

Moving backwards from the striker is the most important aspect of any Brazilian side. The line of 3.

Every Brazil side shares similar characteristics of players in the line of 3. Each having an important job. Each being important to the other. There is one which is. However most important. The trequartista.

The trequartista, or in boring British terminology, the Number 10, is the most important man in the Brazilian 4-2-3-1. He is the artist of the team. The man who makes it tick. He is the creator. The God. Everything go’s through him. He must be adept with the ball in tight situations. Be able to turn on a 6 pence and know what he is doing with the ball before it arrives. He must have impeccable feet, be two footed, and have vision second to none.

The best trequartista in world football is a chap called Mesut Ozil. He was born for 4-2-3-1 and has every attribute required for it.

Either side of the trequartista in the line of 3 you require two men with individually different talents.

Firstly, on one side you need a what I am going to call a wide trequartista. Essentially a trequartista with the ability to play on the wing, on his ‘wrong side.’ Robert Pires was a perfect example of a wide trequartista. Dropping inside to create and score, once again making use of the space that the trequartista creates with his own movement.

Last year we saw us slowly moving to the Brazilian inspired line of 3. When Rosicky was fit, he tended to play in the trequartista position, with Cazorla playing – and exceling – wide of him. It was a blue print of things to come, as Cazorla got more goals and assists per game playing out wide then he did inside.

In Santi Cazorla, we have a suitable candidate for the wide trequartista. Originally a winger, who started to play central midfield for Malaga, he will benefit this season from playing a bit wider. Whereas last season he sometimes got out muscled in the middle, starting wider gives him more space and time on the ball to work his magic. Able to drift inside into the space left by Ozil, these two will play together for fun. Creating space for each other.

And when they do, it will leave plenty of space on the other side for a speed merchant to wreck havoc.

In the line of 3, a speed merchant is of uber importance. If you played 3 technically gifted players, teams could then sit deep and crowd them out. Narrowing the pitch and making it impossible to play through. Sitting and letting them play infront of you. The speed merchant stops this. He is able to smash through the defensive line, diving into the space left by the other two. As defenders get drawn towards the men on the board, the speed merchant will always be open.

And ideal for this role is Theo Walcott. Twice against Sunderland we saw this work. Their defence drifted right towards Ozil, leaving Walcott in acres. Yes, his finishing was not top level, but things will come good. The speed merchant feeds off short passes from the trequartista, a flick round the corner from the pivot, and defence splitting early balls from the two midfielder’s protecting the back line.

In Theo Walcott, alongside Mesut Ozil and Santi Cazorla, we have a brilliantly balanced line of 3. Perhaps one of the best in the world?

Behind the line of 3, you need 2 central midfielders with very similar characteristics. They must be able to defend. They most be able to cover a lot of ground. They must be able to distribute quickly. They must be adept in both attack and defence. And finally they must be intelligent.

Going forward, this two man central midfield will be Aaron Ramsey and Jack Whilshere. With Arteta providing back up/cover/competition for the two. All 3 are proper central midfielder’s. They have the speed of thought to launch the attacks, as well as being decent enough in defence. Ramsey and Wilshere might be a little raw, especially when it comes to defence, but it is worth persevering.

Aaron Ramsey has already shown he is made for this position. He has made more interception’s and tackles then any player in the Premier League. He is also now scored 5 goals in 6 games. Showing he is able to be defensive and attacking at the same time. He makes full use of the space and gaps 4-2-3-1 gives you. Wilshere is suffering a bit. But remember he is coming back from 2 seasons of injuries. His time will come.

Behind them, you have the defence (obviously). The make up of the centre backs is pretty standard. An Alpha and a Beta. The Alpha is usually slower, stronger, bigger, more organised and the leader. The Alpha go’s up for the headers. Sets the line for others to follow. He is your Vidic or your Blanc. The Beta is the athlete. The cover. The one that sweeps round the back. The one who comes out with the ball. He is the submissive partner of the two. The one who often looks better on the eye, but is the lesser man when it comes to pure defending. His strength is in athleticism. In speed. In being able to play. He is your Ferdinand or your Desailly.

For a long time it has been recognised that you need an Alpha and a Beta as part of your defence. Very rarely do you get a Sol Campbell come along, who can be the alpha and beta both at once. The majority of top defenders are one of the other, so for balance it is good to have one each.

Remember playing with Gallas and Toure? Two Betas. Imagine how having Per Mertesacker and John Terry at the back. Two brilliant Alphas but would get exposed for pace and balls in behind.

As with all Brazilian sides, the full backs are important. On the side of the wide trequartista, you need an attacking wing back. The wide man will drop inside creating space, but also creates a lack of width. The full back – in Arsenal’s case Gibbs – needs to be able to get forward, providing that width.

On the other side, you need a defensive full back. He will be exposed more by the speed merchant ahead of him. And with his opposite fullback bombing forward, he will often have to play centre back as the team adopts a 3 man defence with the centre back shifting over to provide cover for his marauding full back, forcing the other centre back and full back to shift over a little.

Bacary Sagna is ideal for this. Never been great at going forward, but capable in defence and comfortable at centre back, he is ideal for this formation. Again, to think Brazil, they used to have Roberto Carlos bomb forward with Cafu sitting. Likewise now they have Dani Alves bombing forward, with their left full back often sitting and dropping into centre back.

With the current World Club Champions being Brazilian and the next World Cup being held there, adopting a Brazilian 4-2-3-1, rather than the current Spanish version, could be the future of football.

And we are nicely set up to lead the way.

Keenos