How many Twitter followers does your club have?

In November 2013, I did a little analysis to see who was the most followed football club on twitter. Arsenal came out on top, but what was surprising was that, at the time, Mesut Ozil had more followers than any Premier League football club.

As it is quite at work in my industry with the lead up to Christmas, I have decided to review the blog and update the figures.

To get a proper provisional analysis, the above is a list of teams who were in the Premier League in 2013, and are in it now.

The first interesting analysis is just how much Twitter has grown over the last 4 years. On average, Premier League sides have increased their following by 552%.

Secondly, Manchester United, who in 2013 were the 4th most followed side in the Premier League, are now topping the table.

In 2013, I noted that I was surprised to see Man U in 4th place as they are easily the most supported club in the UK, and one of the most supported in the world. It shows how poor their media team probably were back in 2013.

The growth of Manchester United aside, Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester City and Liverpool have shown a similar growth pattern.

With regards to Liverpool and Arsenal, it shows how strong and historic the clubs are, that they have been able to continue to grow their support without league titles at a quicker rate than the likes of Manchester City and Chelsea who have won league titles. It shows success is not everything.

Saying that, Spurs now languish a long way behind Manchester City. I wonder how many of those fans that follow City had heard of the club when Twitter was first launched back in 2006?

City’s growth over Spurs does highlight that success is very important, especially when it comes to gaining new fans, and foreign fans.

Spurs have not much bigger a following than Everton, an equally unsuccessful side over the last 20 years. It perhaps shows that Spurs fans claim that there has been a power shift, and that they are a massive club, are false.

In terms of Twitter following, Spurs are the 6th most followed in England. They are probably also the 6th biggest club in the country.

It probably also shows the brand of the Premier League that the biggest growers (bar Manchester United) were smaller clubs, lower down the table. I feel a lot of their followers are general fans of the Premier League, rather than fans of the clubs they follow.

The second table is the clubs who were not in the Premier League in 2013, so I have no original data on them. What is interesting is Leicester City.

At 1.1million followers, they would be placed just behind Newcastle. It would have been interesting to see their 2013 data in comparison. I imagine it would have been not too much higher than Southampton. Leicester’s does show just how much success can increase support.

Like success has boasted Leicester, relegation is also clearly damaging.

Those clubs who went down have still grown their twitter following, but at a slower rate than those who stayed in the Premier League.

The 6 teams who are no longer in the Premier League have increased their Twitter following by, on average, 398%. The bottom 6 teams in the Premier League by followers have increased by 557%.

And finally we come on to how the Premier League sides compare to the rest of the world

The first observation is that Real Madrid have overtaken Barcelona since 2013. Although by the time you include alternative languages for both, Barcelona are still ahead.

One interesting thing to note is the Spanish version of Real Madrid’s twitter is followed by more than the English version, but the English version of Barcelona is followed by more than the Spanish version.

Perhaps this indicates that Real Madrid are more popular in Spain, whilst Barcelona are followed more by foreign fans. I know what I would prefer.

Another interesting thing to note is once you remove the English sides, the rest of the world has only grown by 293%. That against the Premier League’s growth of 522%. It shows that in terms of leagues, the Premier League is still the most popular in the world, even if Barcelona and Real Madrid are streaks ahead in terms of individual club.

The last thing to note is how small Celtic are.

With just 551,000 followers, they are not much bigger than Norwich City, and are well behind the likes of Crystal Palace, WBA and Swansea. They might be a big side in Scotland, but it certainly shows they are a big fish in a small pond. And if they ever did join the Premier League, they would be a very small fish in a big pond.

Until next time


7 thoughts on “How many Twitter followers does your club have?

  1. Scott Jo

    What utter nonsense, especially with your last claim that Celtic would be a very small fish in a big pond if they joined the EPL…Celtic ,and Rangers for that matter are both seriously massive clubs that eclipse most in England, that’s the reality. There’s little media value by playing in Scotland which is why they have fewer twitter followers but it doesn’t really mean much other than lower league media values….Basing the size and prestige of a club based on Twitter followers is a false analysis. Ajax, they have just under a million Twitter followers and judging by that they’re smaller than Aston Villa, Leicester City, Southampton, Newcastle etc etc…..utter nonsense, Ajax are clearly a much bigger and more prestigious club that all of them put together who like Celtic if they were to join the EPL would suddenly find their media values skyrocketing and you’d see the true size of those clubs….clubs like Southampton etc are minnows in comparison to a prestigious and historically significant club like Celtic


      1. Scott Jo

        No, Celtic are the pioneers of British football, the first Northern European club to win the European Cup, the first UK club to reach two European Cup finals….a club of serious heritage that only fuckwits would call tinpot because their knowledge of football s sadly lacking

        You think a club is tinpot simply because they’re Scottish? You sadsack, you know nothing


  2. Scott Jo

    I’ll also add that Celtic were the template for Ajax to develop the total football system of free formation play…they were the club that demolished the Catenaccio stranglehold on European football and established the free-flowing attacking style back into the European game …..they were the UK’s top side for a decade until Liverpool then Manchester Utd ………Arsenal, they did nothing….Liverpool and Manchester Utd are the true prestigious clubs of England…..they have European heritage likewise Celtic…..Arsenal? They’re nothing in comparison….a plastic tourist club, soulless, they are truly tinpot

    Educate yourself son, football didn’t begin in the 90’s


  3. Scott Jo

    The Highbury Library…..says it all huh…..there’s more atmosphere in a library than at an Arsenal game….And you’re calling Celtic tinpot, that’s hilarious


  4. Iain Martin

    How small Celtic are because of the amount of twitter followers they have? You for real? Try counting the amount of supporters clubs they have around the world and then get back to me.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.